TSTP Solution File: SEU123+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SEU123+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:24:48 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 22 ( 9 ~; 6 |; 4 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 1 sgn; 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t3_xboole_1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( subset(X1,empty_set)
=> X1 = empty_set ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aKHLXNEvxG/E---3.1_25313.p',t3_xboole_1) ).
fof(d10_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( X1 = X2
<=> ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X2,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aKHLXNEvxG/E---3.1_25313.p',d10_xboole_0) ).
fof(t2_xboole_1,axiom,
! [X1] : subset(empty_set,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aKHLXNEvxG/E---3.1_25313.p',t2_xboole_1) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( subset(X1,empty_set)
=> X1 = empty_set ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t3_xboole_1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X6,X7] :
( ( subset(X6,X7)
| X6 != X7 )
& ( subset(X7,X6)
| X6 != X7 )
& ( ~ subset(X6,X7)
| ~ subset(X7,X6)
| X6 = X7 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_xboole_0])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( subset(esk1_0,empty_set)
& esk1_0 != empty_set ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X4] : subset(empty_set,X4),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t2_xboole_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ subset(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk1_0,empty_set),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
subset(empty_set,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 != empty_set,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14 % Problem : SEU123+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 09:11:10 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aKHLXNEvxG/E---3.1_25313.p
% 0.22/0.53 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # sh5l with pid 25395 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.22/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.53 # Search class: FHHSS-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53 # partial match(1): FHHSF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 25398 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.22/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.53 # Search class: FHHSS-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53 # partial match(1): FHHSF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.53 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.53 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.53
% 0.22/0.53 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.53 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.53 # Parsed axioms : 12
% 0.22/0.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.22/0.53 # Initial clauses : 14
% 0.22/0.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 14
% 0.22/0.53 # Processed clauses : 26
% 0.22/0.53 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 26
% 0.22/0.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.22/0.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.22/0.53 # Generated clauses : 5
% 0.22/0.53 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.22/0.53 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.22/0.53 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.22/0.53 # Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.22/0.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.22/0.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.22/0.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.22/0.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.22/0.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 3
% 0.22/0.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 13
% 0.22/0.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.22/0.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.22/0.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 529
% 0.22/0.53
% 0.22/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.53 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.53 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.53 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages
% 0.22/0.53
% 0.22/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.53 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.53 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.53 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.22/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------