TSTP Solution File: SEU123+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : SEU123+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:17:35 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SEU123+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Wed Aug 23 21:02:39 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.62  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.21/0.62  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.62  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.21/0.62  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.21/0.62  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.21/0.62  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.21/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.62  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.62  % File     : SEU123+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.21/0.62  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.21/0.62  % Problem  : MPTP bushy problem t3_xboole_1
% 0.21/0.62  % Version  : [Urb07] axioms : Especial.
% 0.21/0.62  % English  :
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  % Refs     : [Ban01] Bancerek et al. (2001), On the Characterizations of Co
% 0.21/0.62  %          : [Urb07] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.21/0.62  % Source   : [Urb07]
% 0.21/0.62  % Names    : bushy-t3_xboole_1 [Urb07]
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.21/0.62  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.11 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.04 v4.0.0, 0.08 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0
% 0.21/0.62  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   6 unt;   0 def)
% 0.21/0.62  %            Number of atoms       :   20 (   4 equ)
% 0.21/0.62  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.21/0.62  %            Number of connectives :   13 (   5   ~;   0   |;   4   &)
% 0.21/0.62  %                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.21/0.62  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
% 0.21/0.62  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.21/0.62  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% 0.21/0.62  %            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.21/0.62  %            Number of variables   :   15 (  13   !;   2   ?)
% 0.21/0.62  % SPC      : FOF_THM_EPR_SEQ
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.21/0.62  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.21/0.62  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.62  fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
% 0.21/0.62      ! [A,B] :
% 0.21/0.62        ( in(A,B)
% 0.21/0.62       => ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  fof(d10_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.21/0.62      ! [A,B] :
% 0.21/0.62        ( A = B
% 0.21/0.63      <=> ( subset(A,B)
% 0.21/0.63          & subset(B,A) ) ) ).
% 0.21/0.63  
% 0.21/0.63  fof(dt_k1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.21/0.63      $true ).
% 0.21/0.63  
% 0.21/0.63  fof(fc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.21/0.63      empty(empty_set) ).
% 0.21/0.63  
% 0.21/0.63  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.21/0.63      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.21/0.63  
% 0.21/0.63  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.21/0.63      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.21/0.63  
% 0.21/0.63  fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
% 0.21/0.63      ! [A,B] : subset(A,A) ).
% 0.21/0.63  
% 0.21/0.63  fof(t2_xboole_1,axiom,
% 0.21/0.63      ! [A] : subset(empty_set,A) ).
% 0.21/0.63  
% 0.21/0.63  fof(t3_xboole_1,conjecture,
% 0.21/0.63      ! [A] :
% 0.21/0.63        ( subset(A,empty_set)
% 0.21/0.63       => A = empty_set ) ).
% 0.21/0.63  
% 0.21/0.63  fof(t6_boole,axiom,
% 0.21/0.63      ! [A] :
% 0.21/0.63        ( empty(A)
% 0.21/0.63       => A = empty_set ) ).
% 0.21/0.63  
% 0.21/0.63  fof(t7_boole,axiom,
% 0.21/0.63      ! [A,B] :
% 0.21/0.63        ~ ( in(A,B)
% 0.21/0.63          & empty(B) ) ).
% 0.21/0.63  
% 0.21/0.63  fof(t8_boole,axiom,
% 0.21/0.63      ! [A,B] :
% 0.21/0.63        ~ ( empty(A)
% 0.21/0.63          & A != B
% 0.21/0.63          & empty(B) ) ).
% 0.21/0.63  
% 0.21/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.63  % Proof found
% 0.21/0.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.63  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.63  %ClaNum:22(EqnAxiom:8)
% 0.21/0.63  %VarNum:26(SingletonVarNum:13)
% 0.21/0.63  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.21/0.63  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.21/0.63  %SharedTerms:9
% 0.21/0.63  %goalClause: 11 14
% 0.21/0.63  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.21/0.63  [9]P1(a1)
% 0.21/0.63  [10]P1(a2)
% 0.21/0.63  [11]P2(a3,a1)
% 0.21/0.63  [14]~E(a3,a1)
% 0.21/0.63  [15]~P1(a4)
% 0.21/0.63  [12]P2(a1,x121)
% 0.21/0.63  [13]P2(x131,x131)
% 0.21/0.63  [16]~P1(x161)+E(x161,a1)
% 0.21/0.63  [19]~E(x191,x192)+P2(x191,x192)
% 0.21/0.63  [20]~P1(x201)+~P3(x202,x201)
% 0.21/0.63  [21]~P3(x212,x211)+~P3(x211,x212)
% 0.21/0.63  [17]~P1(x172)+~P1(x171)+E(x171,x172)
% 0.21/0.63  [22]~P2(x222,x221)+~P2(x221,x222)+E(x221,x222)
% 0.21/0.63  %EqnAxiom
% 0.21/0.63  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.21/0.63  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.21/0.63  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.21/0.63  [4]~P1(x41)+P1(x42)+~E(x41,x42)
% 0.21/0.63  [5]P2(x52,x53)+~E(x51,x52)+~P2(x51,x53)
% 0.21/0.63  [6]P2(x63,x62)+~E(x61,x62)+~P2(x63,x61)
% 0.21/0.63  [7]P3(x72,x73)+~E(x71,x72)+~P3(x71,x73)
% 0.21/0.63  [8]P3(x83,x82)+~E(x81,x82)+~P3(x83,x81)
% 0.21/0.63  
% 0.21/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.63  cnf(25,plain,
% 0.21/0.63     ($false),
% 0.21/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,12,14,9,20,16,22]),
% 0.21/0.63     ['proof']).
% 0.21/0.63  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.63  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------