TSTP Solution File: SEU122+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SEU122+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:14:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.90s 2.09s
% Output   : Refutation 1.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   7 unt;   1 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   2 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(5,axiom,
    ~ subset(empty_set,dollar_c3),
    file('SEU122+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ in(A,B)
    | ~ empty(B) ),
    file('SEU122+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ empty(A)
    | A = B
    | ~ empty(B) ),
    file('SEU122+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( subset(A,B)
    | in(dollar_f1(A,B),A) ),
    file('SEU122+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    empty(empty_set),
    file('SEU122+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    empty(dollar_c1),
    file('SEU122+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    empty_set = dollar_c1,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[14,8,13]),
    [iquote('hyper,14,8,13')] ).

cnf(19,plain,
    ~ subset(dollar_c1,dollar_c3),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[5]),17]),
    [iquote('back_demod,5,demod,17')] ).

cnf(21,plain,
    in(dollar_f1(dollar_c1,dollar_c3),dollar_c1),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[19,12]),
    [iquote('hyper,19,12')] ).

cnf(27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[21,7,14]),
    [iquote('hyper,21,7,14')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SEU122+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 07:55:46 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.90/2.09  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.90/2.09  The process was started by sandbox on n006.cluster.edu,
% 1.90/2.09  Wed Jul 27 07:55:47 2022
% 1.90/2.09  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 19573.
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.90/2.09  set(auto).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.90/2.09  clear(print_given).
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  formula_list(usable).
% 1.90/2.09  all A (A=A).
% 1.90/2.09  all A B (in(A,B)-> -in(B,A)).
% 1.90/2.09  all A B (subset(A,B)<-> (all C (in(C,A)->in(C,B)))).
% 1.90/2.09  $T.
% 1.90/2.09  empty(empty_set).
% 1.90/2.09  exists A empty(A).
% 1.90/2.09  exists A (-empty(A)).
% 1.90/2.09  all A B subset(A,A).
% 1.90/2.09  -(all A subset(empty_set,A)).
% 1.90/2.09  all A (empty(A)->A=empty_set).
% 1.90/2.09  all A B (-(in(A,B)&empty(B))).
% 1.90/2.09  all A B (-(empty(A)&A!=B&empty(B))).
% 1.90/2.09  end_of_list.
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  list(usable).
% 1.90/2.09  0 [] A=A.
% 1.90/2.09  0 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.90/2.09  0 [] -subset(A,B)| -in(C,A)|in(C,B).
% 1.90/2.09  0 [] subset(A,B)|in($f1(A,B),A).
% 1.90/2.09  0 [] subset(A,B)| -in($f1(A,B),B).
% 1.90/2.09  0 [] $T.
% 1.90/2.09  0 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.90/2.09  0 [] empty($c1).
% 1.90/2.09  0 [] -empty($c2).
% 1.90/2.09  0 [] subset(A,A).
% 1.90/2.09  0 [] -subset(empty_set,$c3).
% 1.90/2.09  0 [] -empty(A)|A=empty_set.
% 1.90/2.09  0 [] -in(A,B)| -empty(B).
% 1.90/2.09  0 [] -empty(A)|A=B| -empty(B).
% 1.90/2.09  end_of_list.
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.90/2.09  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.90/2.09  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.90/2.09  clauses in usable.
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.90/2.09     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  ------------> process usable:
% 1.90/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.90/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 2 [] -subset(A,B)| -in(C,A)|in(C,B).
% 1.90/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 3 [] subset(A,B)| -in($f1(A,B),B).
% 1.90/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 4 [] -empty($c2).
% 1.90/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 5 [] -subset(empty_set,$c3).
% 1.90/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 6 [] -empty(A)|A=empty_set.
% 1.90/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 7 [] -in(A,B)| -empty(B).
% 1.90/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 8 [] -empty(A)|A=B| -empty(B).
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  ------------> process sos:
% 1.90/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 11 [] A=A.
% 1.90/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 12 [] subset(A,B)|in($f1(A,B),A).
% 1.90/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 13 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.90/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 14 [] empty($c1).
% 1.90/2.09  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 15 [] subset(A,A).
% 1.90/2.09    Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [copy,11,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.90/2.09  11 back subsumes 10.
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 27 [hyper,21,7,14] $F.
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.90/2.09  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.90/2.09  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.90/2.09  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  ============ end of search ============
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.90/2.09  clauses given                 10
% 1.90/2.09  clauses generated             33
% 1.90/2.09  clauses kept                  25
% 1.90/2.09  clauses forward subsumed      22
% 1.90/2.09  clauses back subsumed          2
% 1.90/2.09  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.90/2.09  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.90/2.09  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.90/2.09  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.90/2.09  
% 1.90/2.09  Process 19573 finished Wed Jul 27 07:55:48 2022
% 1.90/2.09  Otter interrupted
% 1.90/2.09  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------