TSTP Solution File: SEU121+2 by SuperZenon---0.0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem : SEU121+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:48:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 2.56s 2.72s
% Output : Proof 2.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SEU121+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 11:08:13 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 2.56/2.72 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.56/2.72 (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 2.56/2.72 (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 2.56/2.72 % SZS output start Proof
% 2.56/2.72 1. (in T_0 T_1) (-. (in T_0 T_1)) ### Axiom
% 2.56/2.72 2. (-. (in T_0 T_2)) (in T_0 T_2) ### Axiom
% 2.56/2.72 3. ((in T_0 T_1) => (in T_0 T_2)) (-. (in T_0 T_2)) (in T_0 T_1) ### Imply 1 2
% 2.56/2.72 4. (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_2))) (in T_0 T_1) (-. (in T_0 T_2)) ### All 3
% 2.56/2.72 5. (-. (in T_0 T_3)) (in T_0 T_3) ### Axiom
% 2.56/2.72 6. ((in T_0 T_2) => (in T_0 T_3)) (-. (in T_0 T_3)) (in T_0 T_1) (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_2))) ### Imply 4 5
% 2.56/2.72 7. (All C, ((in C T_2) => (in C T_3))) (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_2))) (in T_0 T_1) (-. (in T_0 T_3)) ### All 6
% 2.56/2.72 8. (-. ((in T_0 T_1) => (in T_0 T_3))) (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_2))) (All C, ((in C T_2) => (in C T_3))) ### NotImply 7
% 2.56/2.72 9. (-. (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_3)))) (All C, ((in C T_2) => (in C T_3))) (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_2))) ### NotAllEx 8
% 2.56/2.72 10. (-. (subset T_1 T_3)) (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_2))) (All C, ((in C T_2) => (in C T_3))) ### Definition-Pseudo(subset) 9
% 2.56/2.72 11. (subset T_2 T_3) (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_2))) (-. (subset T_1 T_3)) ### Definition-Pseudo(subset) 10
% 2.56/2.72 12. (subset T_1 T_2) (-. (subset T_1 T_3)) (subset T_2 T_3) ### Definition-Pseudo(subset) 11
% 2.56/2.72 13. (-. (((subset T_1 T_2) /\ (subset T_2 T_3)) => (subset T_1 T_3))) ### ConjTree 12
% 2.56/2.72 14. (-. (All C, (((subset T_1 T_2) /\ (subset T_2 C)) => (subset T_1 C)))) ### NotAllEx 13
% 2.56/2.72 15. (-. (All B, (All C, (((subset T_1 B) /\ (subset B C)) => (subset T_1 C))))) ### NotAllEx 14
% 2.56/2.72 16. (-. (All A, (All B, (All C, (((subset A B) /\ (subset B C)) => (subset A C)))))) ### NotAllEx 15
% 2.56/2.72 % SZS output end Proof
% 2.56/2.72 (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------