TSTP Solution File: SEU121+2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SEU121+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:24:47 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 38 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 13 ~; 12 |; 6 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn; 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t1_xboole_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X2,X3) )
=> subset(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Dq98LgpjCR/E---3.1_15318.p',t1_xboole_1) ).
fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
=> in(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Dq98LgpjCR/E---3.1_15318.p',d3_tarski) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X2,X3) )
=> subset(X1,X3) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t1_xboole_1]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X12] :
( ( ~ subset(X8,X9)
| ~ in(X10,X8)
| in(X10,X9) )
& ( in(esk4_2(X11,X12),X11)
| subset(X11,X12) )
& ( ~ in(esk4_2(X11,X12),X12)
| subset(X11,X12) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( subset(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& subset(esk2_0,esk3_0)
& ~ subset(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( in(X3,X2)
| ~ subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ in(X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( subset(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ in(esk4_2(X1,esk3_0),esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,esk2_0)
| ~ in(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( subset(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ in(esk4_2(X1,esk3_0),esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( in(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1)
| subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.15 % Problem : SEU121+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.37 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 08:37:16 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Dq98LgpjCR/E---3.1_15318.p
% 0.20/0.54 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # new_bool_1 with pid 15398 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.54 # Search class: FGHSS-FFMS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 131s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 15400 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.54 # Search class: FGHSS-FFMS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 131s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.54 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 20
% 0.20/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5
% 0.20/0.54 # Initial clauses : 26
% 0.20/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 26
% 0.20/0.54 # Processed clauses : 80
% 0.20/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # ...subsumed : 8
% 0.20/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 72
% 0.20/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 0.20/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.20/0.54 # Generated clauses : 57
% 0.20/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 45
% 0.20/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Paramodulations : 52
% 0.20/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 5
% 0.20/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 42
% 0.20/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.20/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.20/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.20/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 0.20/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 0.20/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 42
% 0.20/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 27
% 0.20/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 135
% 0.20/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 114
% 0.20/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 0.20/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 56
% 0.20/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 15
% 0.20/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 9
% 0.20/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1881
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.54 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.54 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.54 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.54 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.20/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------