TSTP Solution File: SEU121+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : SEU121+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:48:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.41s
% Output   : Proof 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : SEU121+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 06:59:20 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.41  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.14/0.41  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.14/0.41  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.14/0.41  1. (in T_0 T_1) (-. (in T_0 T_1))   ### Axiom
% 0.14/0.41  2. (-. (in T_0 T_2)) (in T_0 T_2)   ### Axiom
% 0.14/0.41  3. ((in T_0 T_1) => (in T_0 T_2)) (-. (in T_0 T_2)) (in T_0 T_1)   ### Imply 1 2
% 0.14/0.41  4. (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_2))) (in T_0 T_1) (-. (in T_0 T_2))   ### All 3
% 0.14/0.41  5. (-. (in T_0 T_3)) (in T_0 T_3)   ### Axiom
% 0.14/0.41  6. ((in T_0 T_2) => (in T_0 T_3)) (-. (in T_0 T_3)) (in T_0 T_1) (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_2)))   ### Imply 4 5
% 0.14/0.41  7. (All C, ((in C T_2) => (in C T_3))) (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_2))) (in T_0 T_1) (-. (in T_0 T_3))   ### All 6
% 0.14/0.41  8. (-. ((in T_0 T_1) => (in T_0 T_3))) (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_2))) (All C, ((in C T_2) => (in C T_3)))   ### NotImply 7
% 0.14/0.41  9. (-. (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_3)))) (All C, ((in C T_2) => (in C T_3))) (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_2)))   ### NotAllEx 8
% 0.14/0.41  10. (-. (subset T_1 T_3)) (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_2))) (All C, ((in C T_2) => (in C T_3)))   ### Definition-Pseudo(subset) 9
% 0.14/0.41  11. (subset T_2 T_3) (All C, ((in C T_1) => (in C T_2))) (-. (subset T_1 T_3))   ### Definition-Pseudo(subset) 10
% 0.14/0.41  12. (subset T_1 T_2) (-. (subset T_1 T_3)) (subset T_2 T_3)   ### Definition-Pseudo(subset) 11
% 0.14/0.41  13. (-. (((subset T_1 T_2) /\ (subset T_2 T_3)) => (subset T_1 T_3)))   ### ConjTree 12
% 0.14/0.41  14. (-. (All C, (((subset T_1 T_2) /\ (subset T_2 C)) => (subset T_1 C))))   ### NotAllEx 13
% 0.14/0.41  15. (-. (All B, (All C, (((subset T_1 B) /\ (subset B C)) => (subset T_1 C)))))   ### NotAllEx 14
% 0.14/0.41  16. (-. (All A, (All B, (All C, (((subset A B) /\ (subset B C)) => (subset A C))))))   ### NotAllEx 15
% 0.14/0.41  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.14/0.41  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------