TSTP Solution File: SEU121+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : SEU121+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 04:42:47 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 70 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 73 ( 27 ~; 24 |; 18 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 43 ( 0 sgn 24 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(2,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X2,X3) )
=> subset(X1,X3) ),
file('/tmp/tmps2dlze/sel_SEU121+1.p_1',t1_xboole_1) ).
fof(9,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
=> in(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmps2dlze/sel_SEU121+1.p_1',d3_tarski) ).
fof(12,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X2,X3) )
=> subset(X1,X3) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[2]) ).
fof(16,negated_conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X3] :
( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X2,X3)
& ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
fof(17,negated_conjecture,
? [X4,X5,X6] :
( subset(X4,X5)
& subset(X5,X6)
& ~ subset(X4,X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
fof(18,negated_conjecture,
( subset(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& subset(esk2_0,esk3_0)
& ~ subset(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[17]) ).
cnf(19,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
cnf(20,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
cnf(21,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
fof(40,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ~ subset(X1,X2)
| ! [X3] :
( ~ in(X3,X1)
| in(X3,X2) ) )
& ( ? [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
& ~ in(X3,X2) )
| subset(X1,X2) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
fof(41,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
| ! [X6] :
( ~ in(X6,X4)
| in(X6,X5) ) )
& ( ? [X7] :
( in(X7,X4)
& ~ in(X7,X5) )
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[40]) ).
fof(42,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
| ! [X6] :
( ~ in(X6,X4)
| in(X6,X5) ) )
& ( ( in(esk6_2(X4,X5),X4)
& ~ in(esk6_2(X4,X5),X5) )
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[41]) ).
fof(43,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ in(X6,X4)
| in(X6,X5)
| ~ subset(X4,X5) )
& ( ( in(esk6_2(X4,X5),X4)
& ~ in(esk6_2(X4,X5),X5) )
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[42]) ).
fof(44,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ in(X6,X4)
| in(X6,X5)
| ~ subset(X4,X5) )
& ( in(esk6_2(X4,X5),X4)
| subset(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk6_2(X4,X5),X5)
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[43]) ).
cnf(45,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk6_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[44]) ).
cnf(46,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk6_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[44]) ).
cnf(47,plain,
( in(X3,X2)
| ~ subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[44]) ).
cnf(58,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,esk2_0)
| ~ in(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[47,21,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(59,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ in(X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[47,20,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(74,negated_conjecture,
( subset(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ in(esk6_2(X1,esk3_0),esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[45,59,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(86,negated_conjecture,
( subset(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ in(esk6_2(X1,esk3_0),esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[74,58,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(88,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[86,46,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(89,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[88,19,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(90,negated_conjecture,
$false,
89,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SEU/SEU121+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmps2dlze/sel_SEU121+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SEU121+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SEU/SEU121+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SEU/SEU121+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------