TSTP Solution File: SEU119+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU119+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.46s 0.66s
% Output   : Refutation 0.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU119+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 23:58:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.46/0.66  
% 0.46/0.66  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.46/0.66  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.46/0.66  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.46/0.66  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.46/0.66  SPASS derived 1472 clauses, backtracked 84 clauses, performed 3 splits and kept 619 clauses.
% 0.46/0.66  SPASS allocated 86271 KBytes.
% 0.46/0.66  SPASS spent	0:00:00.31 on the problem.
% 0.46/0.66  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.46/0.66  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.46/0.66  		0:00:00.02 for inferences.
% 0.46/0.66  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.46/0.66  		0:00:00.19 for the reduction.
% 0.46/0.66  
% 0.46/0.66  
% 0.46/0.66  Here is a proof with depth 8, length 52 :
% 0.46/0.66  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.46/0.66  3[0:Inp] ||  -> disjoint(skc10,skc9)*.
% 0.46/0.66  5[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(u,u),u)**.
% 0.46/0.66  6[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP0(skc7,skc8) in(skc11,skc10)*.
% 0.46/0.66  7[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP0(skc7,skc8) in(skc11,skc9)*.
% 0.46/0.66  8[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(u,v),set_intersection2(v,u))*.
% 0.46/0.66  9[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(u,empty_set) in(skf2(u),u)*.
% 0.46/0.66  11[0:Inp] || SkP0(u,v) disjoint(v,u)* -> .
% 0.46/0.66  13[0:Inp] || in(u,v)* equal(v,empty_set) -> .
% 0.46/0.66  14[0:Inp] || disjoint(u,v) -> equal(set_intersection2(u,v),empty_set)**.
% 0.46/0.66  15[0:Inp] || equal(set_intersection2(u,v),empty_set)** -> disjoint(u,v).
% 0.46/0.66  16[0:Inp] || SkP0(u,v)*+ in(w,u)* in(w,v)* -> .
% 0.46/0.66  18[0:Inp] || in(u,v)* equal(v,set_intersection2(w,x))*+ -> in(u,x)*.
% 0.46/0.66  19[0:Inp] || in(u,v)* in(u,w)* equal(x,set_intersection2(w,v))*+ -> in(u,x)*.
% 0.46/0.66  23[0:Res:3.0,14.0] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(skc10,skc9),empty_set)**.
% 0.46/0.66  27[0:Rew:8.0,23.0] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(skc9,skc10),empty_set)**.
% 0.46/0.66  55[0:SpL:8.0,15.0] || equal(set_intersection2(u,v),empty_set)** -> disjoint(v,u).
% 0.46/0.66  84[0:EqR:18.1] || in(u,set_intersection2(v,w))* -> in(u,w).
% 0.46/0.66  85[0:SpL:5.0,18.1] || in(u,v)*+ equal(v,w)* -> in(u,w)*.
% 0.46/0.66  97[0:Res:9.1,84.0] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(u,v),empty_set) in(skf2(set_intersection2(u,v)),v)*.
% 0.46/0.66  120[0:EqR:19.2] || in(u,v) in(u,w) -> in(u,set_intersection2(w,v))*.
% 0.46/0.66  138[0:SpR:8.0,97.1] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(u,v),empty_set) in(skf2(set_intersection2(v,u)),v)*.
% 0.46/0.66  330[0:Res:7.1,85.0] || equal(skc9,u) -> SkP0(skc7,skc8) in(skc11,u)*.
% 0.46/0.66  331[0:Res:6.1,85.0] || equal(skc10,u) -> SkP0(skc7,skc8) in(skc11,u)*.
% 0.46/0.66  414[1:Spt:330.0,330.2] || equal(skc9,u) -> in(skc11,u)*.
% 0.46/0.66  488[2:Spt:331.0,331.2] || equal(skc10,u) -> in(skc11,u)*.
% 0.46/0.66  507[0:SpR:27.0,120.2] || in(u,skc10)* in(u,skc9) -> in(u,empty_set).
% 0.46/0.66  697[2:Res:488.1,507.0] || equal(skc10,skc10) in(skc11,skc9)* -> in(skc11,empty_set).
% 0.46/0.66  711[2:Obv:697.0] || in(skc11,skc9)* -> in(skc11,empty_set).
% 0.46/0.66  730[2:Res:414.1,711.0] || equal(skc9,skc9) -> in(skc11,empty_set)*.
% 0.46/0.66  731[2:Obv:730.0] ||  -> in(skc11,empty_set)*.
% 0.46/0.66  734[2:Res:731.0,13.0] || equal(empty_set,empty_set)* -> .
% 0.46/0.66  738[2:Obv:734.0] ||  -> .
% 0.46/0.66  739[2:Spt:738.0,331.1] ||  -> SkP0(skc7,skc8)*.
% 0.46/0.66  742[2:Res:739.0,16.0] || in(u,skc7) in(u,skc8)* -> .
% 0.46/0.66  803[2:Res:97.1,742.1] || in(skf2(set_intersection2(u,skc8)),skc7)* -> equal(set_intersection2(u,skc8),empty_set).
% 0.46/0.66  1142[2:Res:138.1,803.0] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(skc8,skc7),empty_set)** equal(set_intersection2(skc7,skc8),empty_set).
% 0.46/0.66  1145[2:Rew:8.0,1142.0] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(skc7,skc8),empty_set)** equal(set_intersection2(skc7,skc8),empty_set)**.
% 0.46/0.66  1146[2:Obv:1145.0] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(skc7,skc8),empty_set)**.
% 0.46/0.66  1159[2:SpL:1146.0,55.0] || equal(empty_set,empty_set) -> disjoint(skc8,skc7)*.
% 0.46/0.66  1170[2:Obv:1159.0] ||  -> disjoint(skc8,skc7)*.
% 0.46/0.66  1177[2:Res:1170.0,11.1] || SkP0(skc7,skc8)* -> .
% 0.46/0.66  1178[2:MRR:1177.0,739.0] ||  -> .
% 0.46/0.66  1179[1:Spt:1178.0,330.1] ||  -> SkP0(skc7,skc8)*.
% 0.46/0.66  1183[1:Res:1179.0,16.0] || in(u,skc7) in(u,skc8)* -> .
% 0.46/0.66  1204[1:Res:97.1,1183.1] || in(skf2(set_intersection2(u,skc8)),skc7)* -> equal(set_intersection2(u,skc8),empty_set).
% 0.46/0.66  1710[1:Res:138.1,1204.0] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(skc8,skc7),empty_set)** equal(set_intersection2(skc7,skc8),empty_set).
% 0.46/0.66  1714[1:Rew:8.0,1710.0] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(skc7,skc8),empty_set)** equal(set_intersection2(skc7,skc8),empty_set)**.
% 0.46/0.66  1715[1:Obv:1714.0] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(skc7,skc8),empty_set)**.
% 0.46/0.66  1778[1:SpL:1715.0,55.0] || equal(empty_set,empty_set) -> disjoint(skc8,skc7)*.
% 0.46/0.66  1788[1:Obv:1778.0] ||  -> disjoint(skc8,skc7)*.
% 0.46/0.66  1797[1:Res:1788.0,11.1] || SkP0(skc7,skc8)* -> .
% 0.46/0.66  1798[1:MRR:1797.0,1179.0] ||  -> .
% 0.46/0.66  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.46/0.66  Formulae used in the proof : t3_xboole_0 d1_xboole_0 idempotence_k3_xboole_0 d3_xboole_0 d7_xboole_0 commutativity_k3_xboole_0
% 0.46/0.66  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------