TSTP Solution File: SEU105+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU105+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:33:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.63s 2.84s
% Output   : Refutation 2.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   33 (  12 unt;   2 nHn;  33 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   71 (   0 equ;  46 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(9,axiom,
    ~ preboolean(skc5),
    file('SEU105+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(46,axiom,
    ( preboolean(u)
    | in(skf15(u),u) ),
    file('SEU105+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(47,axiom,
    ( preboolean(u)
    | in(skf14(u),u) ),
    file('SEU105+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(49,axiom,
    equal(set_union2(u,v),set_union2(v,u)),
    file('SEU105+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(50,axiom,
    equal(set_intersection2(u,v),set_intersection2(v,u)),
    file('SEU105+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(51,axiom,
    equal(symmetric_difference(u,v),symmetric_difference(v,u)),
    file('SEU105+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(57,axiom,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | element(u,v) ),
    file('SEU105+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(63,axiom,
    equal(symmetric_difference(u,set_intersection2(u,v)),set_difference(u,v)),
    file('SEU105+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(70,axiom,
    equal(symmetric_difference(symmetric_difference(u,v),set_intersection2(u,v)),set_union2(u,v)),
    file('SEU105+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(73,axiom,
    ( ~ element(u,skc5)
    | ~ element(v,skc5)
    | in(symmetric_difference(v,u),skc5) ),
    file('SEU105+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(74,axiom,
    ( ~ element(u,skc5)
    | ~ element(v,skc5)
    | in(set_intersection2(v,u),skc5) ),
    file('SEU105+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(77,axiom,
    ( ~ in(set_union2(skf15(u),skf14(u)),u)
    | ~ in(set_difference(skf15(u),skf14(u)),u)
    | preboolean(u) ),
    file('SEU105+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(78,plain,
    equal(symmetric_difference(set_intersection2(u,v),symmetric_difference(u,v)),set_union2(u,v)),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[51,70]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:51.0,70.0')] ).

cnf(79,plain,
    ( ~ in(set_difference(skf15(u),skf14(u)),u)
    | ~ in(set_union2(skf14(u),skf15(u)),u)
    | preboolean(u) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[49,77]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:49.0,77.0')] ).

cnf(80,plain,
    ( ~ in(set_difference(skf15(skc5),skf14(skc5)),skc5)
    | ~ in(set_union2(skf14(skc5),skf15(skc5)),skc5) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[79,9]),
    [iquote('0:Res:79.2,9.0')] ).

cnf(82,plain,
    in(skf15(skc5),skc5),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[46,9]),
    [iquote('0:Res:46.1,9.0')] ).

cnf(83,plain,
    in(skf14(skc5),skc5),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[47,9]),
    [iquote('0:Res:47.1,9.0')] ).

cnf(445,plain,
    ( ~ element(set_intersection2(u,v),skc5)
    | ~ element(u,skc5)
    | in(set_difference(u,v),skc5) ),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[63,73]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:63.0,73.2')] ).

cnf(450,plain,
    ( ~ element(symmetric_difference(u,v),skc5)
    | ~ element(set_intersection2(u,v),skc5)
    | in(set_union2(u,v),skc5) ),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[78,73]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:78.0,73.2')] ).

cnf(1012,plain,
    ( ~ in(set_intersection2(u,v),skc5)
    | ~ element(u,skc5)
    | in(set_difference(u,v),skc5) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[57,445]),
    [iquote('0:Res:57.1,445.0')] ).

cnf(1139,plain,
    ( ~ in(symmetric_difference(u,v),skc5)
    | ~ element(set_intersection2(u,v),skc5)
    | in(set_union2(u,v),skc5) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[57,450]),
    [iquote('0:Res:57.1,450.0')] ).

cnf(2163,plain,
    ( ~ in(set_intersection2(skf15(skc5),skf14(skc5)),skc5)
    | ~ element(skf15(skc5),skc5)
    | ~ in(set_union2(skf14(skc5),skf15(skc5)),skc5) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1012,80]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1012.2,80.0')] ).

cnf(2167,plain,
    ( ~ in(set_intersection2(skf14(skc5),skf15(skc5)),skc5)
    | ~ element(skf15(skc5),skc5)
    | ~ in(set_union2(skf14(skc5),skf15(skc5)),skc5) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[50,2163]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:50.0,2163.0')] ).

cnf(2340,plain,
    ( ~ in(set_intersection2(u,v),skc5)
    | ~ in(symmetric_difference(u,v),skc5)
    | in(set_union2(u,v),skc5) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[57,1139]),
    [iquote('0:Res:57.1,1139.1')] ).

cnf(10730,plain,
    ( ~ element(u,skc5)
    | ~ element(v,skc5)
    | ~ in(set_intersection2(v,u),skc5)
    | in(set_union2(v,u),skc5) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[73,2340]),
    [iquote('0:Res:73.2,2340.1')] ).

cnf(10735,plain,
    ( ~ element(u,skc5)
    | ~ element(v,skc5)
    | in(set_union2(v,u),skc5) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[10730,74]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:10730.2,74.2')] ).

cnf(12016,plain,
    ( ~ element(skf15(skc5),skc5)
    | ~ element(skf14(skc5),skc5)
    | ~ element(skf15(skc5),skc5)
    | ~ in(set_union2(skf14(skc5),skf15(skc5)),skc5) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[74,2167]),
    [iquote('0:Res:74.2,2167.0')] ).

cnf(12017,plain,
    ( ~ element(skf14(skc5),skc5)
    | ~ element(skf15(skc5),skc5)
    | ~ in(set_union2(skf14(skc5),skf15(skc5)),skc5) ),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[12016]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:12016.0')] ).

cnf(12018,plain,
    ( ~ element(skf14(skc5),skc5)
    | ~ element(skf15(skc5),skc5) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[12017,10735]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:12017.2,10735.2')] ).

cnf(12019,plain,
    ( ~ in(skf15(skc5),skc5)
    | ~ element(skf14(skc5),skc5) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[57,12018]),
    [iquote('0:Res:57.1,12018.1')] ).

cnf(12020,plain,
    ~ element(skf14(skc5),skc5),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[12019,82]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:12019.0,82.0')] ).

cnf(12021,plain,
    ~ in(skf14(skc5),skc5),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[57,12020]),
    [iquote('0:Res:57.1,12020.0')] ).

cnf(12022,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[12021,83]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:12021.0,83.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SEU105+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 00:49:46 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  SPASS V 3.9 
% 2.63/2.84  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 2.63/2.84  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.63/2.84  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 2.63/2.84  SPASS derived 9640 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 5 splits and kept 4079 clauses.
% 2.63/2.84  SPASS allocated 111612 KBytes.
% 2.63/2.84  SPASS spent	0:00:02.38 on the problem.
% 2.63/2.84  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 2.63/2.84  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 2.63/2.84  		0:00:00.14 for inferences.
% 2.63/2.84  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 2.63/2.84  		0:00:02.07 for the reduction.
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  
% 2.63/2.84  Here is a proof with depth 6, length 33 :
% 2.63/2.84  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.63/2.84  Formulae used in the proof : t16_finsub_1 t10_finsub_1 commutativity_k2_xboole_0 commutativity_k3_xboole_0 commutativity_k5_xboole_0 t1_subset t100_xboole_1 t94_xboole_1
% 2.63/2.84  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------