TSTP Solution File: SEU098+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU098+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:38:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.89s 2.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   41 (  15 unt;   2 nHn;  31 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   95 (   6 equ;  55 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   1 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_160,plain,
    ( finite(X1)
    | ~ finite(X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_160) ).

cnf(i_0_164,plain,
    ( subset(X1,cartesian_product2(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X1)))
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_164) ).

cnf(i_0_41,plain,
    ( finite(cartesian_product2(X1,X2))
    | ~ finite(X2)
    | ~ finite(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_41) ).

cnf(i_0_165,plain,
    ( finite(relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ finite(relation_dom(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_165) ).

cnf(i_0_154,plain,
    ( function_image(X1,X2,X3,X4) = relation_image(X3,X4)
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ quasi_total(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ relation_of2(X3,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_154) ).

cnf(i_0_159,plain,
    ( function_image(cartesian_product2(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X1)),relation_dom(X1),first_projection(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X1)),X1) = relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_159) ).

cnf(i_0_32,plain,
    function(first_projection(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_32) ).

cnf(i_0_31,plain,
    quasi_total(first_projection(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X1,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_31) ).

cnf(i_0_166,negated_conjecture,
    ( finite(esk30_0)
    | finite(relation_dom(esk30_0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_166) ).

cnf(i_0_169,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk30_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_169) ).

cnf(i_0_168,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk30_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_168) ).

cnf(i_0_157,plain,
    ( relation_of2(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_157) ).

cnf(i_0_30,plain,
    relation_of2_as_subset(first_projection(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X1,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_30) ).

cnf(i_0_167,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ finite(esk30_0)
    | ~ finite(relation_dom(esk30_0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_167) ).

cnf(i_0_40,plain,
    ( finite(relation_image(X1,X2))
    | ~ finite(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_40) ).

cnf(i_0_29,plain,
    relation(first_projection(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dp6u9o2n/lgb.p',i_0_29) ).

cnf(c_0_186,plain,
    ( finite(X1)
    | ~ finite(X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_160 ).

cnf(c_0_187,plain,
    ( subset(X1,cartesian_product2(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X1)))
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_164 ).

cnf(c_0_188,plain,
    ( finite(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ finite(cartesian_product2(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X1))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_186,c_0_187]) ).

cnf(c_0_189,plain,
    ( finite(cartesian_product2(X1,X2))
    | ~ finite(X2)
    | ~ finite(X1) ),
    i_0_41 ).

cnf(c_0_190,plain,
    ( finite(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ finite(relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ finite(relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_188,c_0_189]) ).

cnf(c_0_191,plain,
    ( finite(relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ finite(relation_dom(X1)) ),
    i_0_165 ).

cnf(c_0_192,plain,
    ( function_image(X1,X2,X3,X4) = relation_image(X3,X4)
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ quasi_total(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ relation_of2(X3,X1,X2) ),
    i_0_154 ).

cnf(c_0_193,plain,
    ( function_image(cartesian_product2(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X1)),relation_dom(X1),first_projection(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X1)),X1) = relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_159 ).

cnf(c_0_194,plain,
    function(first_projection(X1,X2)),
    i_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_195,plain,
    quasi_total(first_projection(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X1,X2),X1),
    i_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_196,plain,
    ( finite(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ finite(relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_190,c_0_191]) ).

cnf(c_0_197,negated_conjecture,
    ( finite(esk30_0)
    | finite(relation_dom(esk30_0)) ),
    i_0_166 ).

cnf(c_0_198,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk30_0),
    i_0_169 ).

cnf(c_0_199,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk30_0),
    i_0_168 ).

cnf(c_0_200,plain,
    ( relation_image(first_projection(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X1)),X1) = relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ relation_of2(first_projection(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X1)),cartesian_product2(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X1)),relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_192,c_0_193]),c_0_194]),c_0_195])]) ).

cnf(c_0_201,plain,
    ( relation_of2(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3) ),
    i_0_157 ).

cnf(c_0_202,plain,
    relation_of2_as_subset(first_projection(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X1,X2),X1),
    i_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_203,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ finite(esk30_0)
    | ~ finite(relation_dom(esk30_0)) ),
    i_0_167 ).

cnf(c_0_204,negated_conjecture,
    finite(esk30_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_196,c_0_197]),c_0_198]),c_0_199])]) ).

cnf(c_0_205,plain,
    ( finite(relation_image(X1,X2))
    | ~ finite(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_40 ).

cnf(c_0_206,plain,
    ( relation_image(first_projection(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X1)),X1) = relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_200,c_0_201]),c_0_202])]) ).

cnf(c_0_207,plain,
    relation(first_projection(X1,X2)),
    i_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_208,negated_conjecture,
    ~ finite(relation_dom(esk30_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_203,c_0_204])]) ).

cnf(c_0_209,plain,
    ( finite(relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ finite(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_205,c_0_206]),c_0_207]),c_0_194])]) ).

cnf(c_0_210,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_208,c_0_209]),c_0_198]),c_0_199]),c_0_204])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SEU098+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 23:30:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.89/2.50  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.89/2.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.89/2.50  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.89/2.50  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 8.89/2.50  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.89/2.50  #
% 8.89/2.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 8.89/2.50  
% 8.89/2.50  # Proof found!
% 8.89/2.50  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.89/2.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.89/2.50  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.89/2.50  
% 8.89/2.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.89/2.50  # User time                : 0.027 s
% 8.89/2.50  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 8.89/2.50  # Total time               : 0.034 s
% 8.89/2.50  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.89/2.50  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------