TSTP Solution File: SEU096+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SEU096+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:26:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 1.93s 2.12s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10 % Problem : SEU096+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.10 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 19:10:54 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.33 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.15/0.33 The process was started by sandbox2 on n016.cluster.edu,
% 0.15/0.33 Sun Jun 19 19:10:54 2022
% 0.15/0.33 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 29389.
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.15/0.33 set(auto).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.15/0.33 clear(print_given).
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 formula_list(usable).
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.15/0.33 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.15/0.33 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.15/0.33 clauses in usable.
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.15/0.33 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 ------------> process usable:
% 0.15/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -empty(A)| -ordinal(A)|epsilon_transitive(A).
% 0.15/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -empty(A)| -ordinal(A)|epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.15/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -element(A,positive_rationals)| -ordinal(A)|epsilon_transitive(A).
% 0.15/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -element(A,positive_rationals)| -ordinal(A)|epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.15/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -finite(B)|finite(relation_image(A,B)).
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 ------------> process sos:
% 0.15/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 47 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.15/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 48 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.15/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 49 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation_empty_yielding(empty_set).
% 0.15/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 47 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.15/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 47 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.15/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 48 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.15/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 137 during input processing: 0 [copy,137,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.15/0.33 137 back subsumes 45.
% 0.15/0.33
% 0.15/0.33 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.15/0.36
% 0.15/0.36 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.15/0.36
% 0.15/0.36 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.15/0.36
% 0.15/0.36
% 0.15/0.36 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.15/0.36
% 0.15/0.36 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.15/0.36 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.15/0.36 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.15/0.36 number of clauses in intial UL: 44
% 0.15/0.36 number of clauses initially in problem: 136
% 0.15/0.36 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 32
% 0.15/0.36 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 55
% 0.15/0.36 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.15/0.36 absolute distinct symbol count: 54
% 0.15/0.36 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.15/0.36 distinct function count: 9
% 0.15/0.36 distinct constant count: 25
% 0.15/0.36
% 0.15/0.36 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.15/0.36
% 0.15/0.36
% 0.15/0.36
% 0.15/0.36 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.15/0.36
% 0.15/0.36 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.15/0.36
% 0.15/0.36 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 8 [ 1 1 330 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 9 [ 1 0 437 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 10 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 11 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 12 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 13 [ 2 1 2076 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 14 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 15 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 16 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 17 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 18 [ 1 1 1222 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 19 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 20 [ 3 0 552 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 21 [ 3 0 1089 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 22 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 23 [ 5 1 2174 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 24 [ 8 1 2112 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 25 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 26 [ 8 0 545 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 27 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 28 [ 4 0 1246 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 29 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.93/2.11 $c8=$c7.
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 1.93/2.11 9 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 287.4 K.
% 1.93/2.11 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 1.93/2.11 sym_ent ( 304) 166 0 166 0 49.3 K
% 1.93/2.11 term ( 32) 6595 5714 881 3 27.6 K
% 1.93/2.11 rel ( 40) 4464 3822 642 1 25.1 K
% 1.93/2.11 term_ptr ( 16) 1656 340 1316 25 21.0 K
% 1.93/2.11 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.93/2.11 fpa_head ( 24) 529 51 478 12 11.5 K
% 1.93/2.11 fpa_tree ( 56) 573 573 0 7 0.4 K
% 1.93/2.11 context (1288) 1815 1815 0 6 7.5 K
% 1.93/2.11 trail ( 24) 629 629 0 3 0.1 K
% 1.93/2.11 imd_tree ( 32) 6 2 4 0 0.1 K
% 1.93/2.11 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.93/2.11 is_tree ( 24) 333 44 289 9 7.0 K
% 1.93/2.11 is_pos (2424) 1079 1079 0 2 4.7 K
% 1.93/2.11 fsub_pos ( 16) 572 572 0 1 0.0 K
% 1.93/2.11 literal ( 32) 855 385 470 1 14.7 K
% 1.93/2.11 clause ( 88) 483 145 338 1 29.1 K
% 1.93/2.11 list ( 272) 71 64 7 2 2.4 K
% 1.93/2.11 clash_nd ( 80) 130 130 0 2 0.2 K
% 1.93/2.11 clause_ptr ( 16) 253 48 205 9 3.3 K
% 1.93/2.11 int_ptr ( 16) 927 630 297 4 4.7 K
% 1.93/2.11 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.93/2.11 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.93/2.11 ans_lit_node( 24) 0
% 1.93/2.11 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 1.93/2.11 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.93/2.11 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.93/2.11 formula( 40) 572 572 0 380 14.8 K
% 1.93/2.11 formula_ptr( 16) 61 61 0 61 1.0 K
% 1.93/2.11 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 true clauses given 5 (15.2%)
% 1.93/2.11 false clauses given 28
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 FALSE TRUE
% 1.93/2.11 2 8 38
% 1.93/2.11 3 8 24
% 1.93/2.11 4 1 10
% 1.93/2.11 5 3 3
% 1.93/2.11 6 0 5
% 1.93/2.11 7 2 0
% 1.93/2.11 8 0 2
% 1.93/2.11 tot: 22 82 (78.8% true)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Model 29 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.93/2.11
% 1.93/2.11 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 1.93/2.11 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:3 7:2 8:2 9:6 10:0
% 1.93/2.11 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:3 15:3 16:3 17:0 18:1 19:0 20:0
% 1.93/2.11 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:5 26:2 27:0 28:1 29:0 30:0
% 1.93/2.12 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 1.93/2.12 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:1 47:4 48:4 49:2 50:3
% 1.93/2.12 51:2 52:2 53:2 54:1 55:1 56:1 57:1 58:0 59:0 60:0
% 1.93/2.12 61:0 62:1 63:0 64:0 65:1 66:1 67:1 68:1 69:1 70:1
% 1.93/2.12 71:1 72:2 73:3 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 1.93/2.12 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:2
% 1.93/2.12 91:1 92:2 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 1.93/2.12 All others: 37.
% 1.93/2.12
% 1.93/2.12 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 1.93/2.12
% 1.93/2.12 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------