TSTP Solution File: SEU096+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SEU096+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:24:43 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  16   ~;  13   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0 sgn;  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t27_finset_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2) )
     => ( ( subset(X1,relation_rng(X2))
          & finite(relation_inverse_image(X2,X1)) )
       => finite(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bwaFJy76wC/E---3.1_4859.p',t27_finset_1) ).

fof(fc13_finset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1)
        & finite(X2) )
     => finite(relation_image(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bwaFJy76wC/E---3.1_4859.p',fc13_finset_1) ).

fof(t147_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2) )
     => ( subset(X1,relation_rng(X2))
       => relation_image(X2,relation_inverse_image(X2,X1)) = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bwaFJy76wC/E---3.1_4859.p',t147_funct_1) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( relation(X2)
          & function(X2) )
       => ( ( subset(X1,relation_rng(X2))
            & finite(relation_inverse_image(X2,X1)) )
         => finite(X1) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t27_finset_1]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X44,X45] :
      ( ~ relation(X44)
      | ~ function(X44)
      | ~ finite(X45)
      | finite(relation_image(X44,X45)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc13_finset_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk2_0)
    & function(esk2_0)
    & subset(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk2_0))
    & finite(relation_inverse_image(esk2_0,esk1_0))
    & ~ finite(esk1_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X12,X13] :
      ( ~ relation(X13)
      | ~ function(X13)
      | ~ subset(X12,relation_rng(X13))
      | relation_image(X13,relation_inverse_image(X13,X12)) = X12 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t147_funct_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( finite(relation_image(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ finite(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( relation_image(X1,relation_inverse_image(X1,X2)) = X2
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ subset(X2,relation_rng(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( finite(relation_image(esk2_0,X1))
    | ~ finite(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    finite(relation_inverse_image(esk2_0,esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    relation_image(esk2_0,relation_inverse_image(esk2_0,esk1_0)) = esk1_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ finite(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10  % Problem    : SEU096+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 08:52:01 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bwaFJy76wC/E---3.1_4859.p
% 0.16/0.45  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # new_bool_3 with pid 4938 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.45  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.45  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with pid 4941 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S
% 0.16/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.45  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.45  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.45  # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.45  
% 0.16/0.45  # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.45  # Parsed axioms                        : 60
% 0.16/0.45  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 23
% 0.16/0.45  # Initial clauses                      : 63
% 0.16/0.45  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 63
% 0.16/0.45  # Processed clauses                    : 128
% 0.16/0.45  # ...of these trivial                  : 9
% 0.16/0.45  # ...subsumed                          : 8
% 0.16/0.45  # ...remaining for further processing  : 111
% 0.16/0.45  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Backward-rewritten                   : 32
% 0.16/0.45  # Generated clauses                    : 147
% 0.16/0.45  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 131
% 0.16/0.45  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Paramodulations                      : 147
% 0.16/0.45  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Total rewrite steps                  : 106
% 0.16/0.45  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/0.45  # Current number of processed clauses  : 79
% 0.16/0.45  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 30
% 0.16/0.45  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.45  #    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.16/0.45  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 42
% 0.16/0.45  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 52
% 0.16/0.45  # ...number of literals in the above   : 101
% 0.16/0.45  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Current number of archived clauses   : 32
% 0.16/0.45  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 118
% 0.16/0.45  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 110
% 0.16/0.45  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 0.16/0.45  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 160
% 0.16/0.45  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 0.16/0.45  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.16/0.45  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/0.45  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 4070
% 0.16/0.45  
% 0.16/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.45  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.16/0.45  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.45  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.16/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1888 pages
% 0.16/0.45  
% 0.16/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.45  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.16/0.45  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.45  # Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.16/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 0.16/0.45  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.45  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------