TSTP Solution File: SEU094+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU094+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:33:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SEU094+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 22:44:39 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.49  
% 0.21/0.49  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.21/0.49  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.21/0.49  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.49  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.21/0.49  SPASS derived 511 clauses, backtracked 21 clauses, performed 3 splits and kept 436 clauses.
% 0.21/0.49  SPASS allocated 98119 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.49  SPASS spent	0:00:00.14 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.49  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.21/0.49  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.49  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.49  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.49  		0:00:00.03 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.49  
% 0.21/0.49  
% 0.21/0.49  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 42 :
% 0.21/0.49  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.49  97[0:Inp] ||  -> finite(skc23) finite(union(skc23))*.
% 0.21/0.49  111[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(u,powerset(union(u)))*.
% 0.21/0.49  117[0:Inp] finite(u) ||  -> finite(powerset(u))*.
% 0.21/0.49  129[0:Inp] || in(u,v) -> subset(u,union(v))*.
% 0.21/0.49  130[0:Inp] || in(u,skc23)*+ -> finite(u) finite(union(skc23))*.
% 0.21/0.49  137[0:Inp] finite(u) || subset(v,u)* -> finite(v).
% 0.21/0.49  140[0:Inp] || finite(skc23) finite(union(skc23))* -> in(skc24,skc23).
% 0.21/0.49  141[0:Inp] || finite(skc23) finite(skc24) finite(union(skc23))* -> .
% 0.21/0.49  143[0:Inp] finite(u) ||  -> finite(union(u)) in(skf7(u),u)*.
% 0.21/0.49  144[0:Inp] finite(u) || finite(skf7(v))*+ -> finite(union(u))*.
% 0.21/0.49  150[1:Spt:130.0,130.1] || in(u,skc23)* -> finite(u).
% 0.21/0.49  151[2:Spt:97.0] ||  -> finite(skc23)*.
% 0.21/0.49  152[2:MRR:141.0,151.0] || finite(skc24) finite(union(skc23))* -> .
% 0.21/0.49  153[2:MRR:140.0,151.0] || finite(union(skc23))* -> in(skc24,skc23).
% 0.21/0.49  254[0:Res:111.0,137.1] finite(powerset(union(u))) ||  -> finite(u)*.
% 0.21/0.49  255[0:Res:129.1,137.1] finite(union(u)) || in(v,u)* -> finite(v).
% 0.21/0.49  284[1:Res:143.2,150.0] finite(skc23) ||  -> finite(union(skc23)) finite(skf7(skc23))*.
% 0.21/0.49  289[2:SSi:284.0,151.0] ||  -> finite(union(skc23)) finite(skf7(skc23))*.
% 0.21/0.49  297[3:Spt:289.0] ||  -> finite(union(skc23))*.
% 0.21/0.49  298[3:MRR:152.1,297.0] || finite(skc24)* -> .
% 0.21/0.49  299[3:MRR:153.0,297.0] ||  -> in(skc24,skc23)*.
% 0.21/0.49  301[3:Res:299.0,150.0] ||  -> finite(skc24)*.
% 0.21/0.49  304[3:MRR:301.0,298.0] ||  -> .
% 0.21/0.49  305[3:Spt:304.0,289.0,297.0] || finite(union(skc23))* -> .
% 0.21/0.49  306[3:Spt:304.0,289.1] ||  -> finite(skf7(skc23))*.
% 0.21/0.49  307[3:Res:306.0,144.1] finite(u) ||  -> finite(union(u))*.
% 0.21/0.49  316[3:Res:307.1,305.0] finite(skc23) ||  -> .
% 0.21/0.49  317[3:SSi:316.0,151.0] ||  -> .
% 0.21/0.49  318[2:Spt:317.0,97.0,151.0] || finite(skc23)* -> .
% 0.21/0.49  319[2:Spt:317.0,97.1] ||  -> finite(union(skc23))*.
% 0.21/0.49  337[0:SoR:254.0,117.1] finite(union(u)) ||  -> finite(u)*.
% 0.21/0.49  339[2:SoR:337.0,319.0] ||  -> finite(skc23)*.
% 0.21/0.49  343[2:MRR:339.0,318.0] ||  -> .
% 0.21/0.49  344[1:Spt:343.0,130.2] ||  -> finite(union(skc23))*.
% 0.21/0.49  345[1:MRR:140.1,344.0] || finite(skc23) -> in(skc24,skc23)*.
% 0.21/0.49  346[1:MRR:141.2,344.0] || finite(skc23) finite(skc24)* -> .
% 0.21/0.49  347[1:SoR:337.0,344.0] ||  -> finite(skc23)*.
% 0.21/0.49  348[1:MRR:345.0,347.0] ||  -> in(skc24,skc23)*.
% 0.21/0.49  349[1:MRR:346.0,347.0] || finite(skc24)* -> .
% 0.21/0.49  716[1:SoR:255.0,344.0] || in(u,skc23)* -> finite(u).
% 0.21/0.49  728[1:Res:348.0,716.0] ||  -> finite(skc24)*.
% 0.21/0.49  729[1:MRR:728.0,349.0] ||  -> .
% 0.21/0.49  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.49  Formulae used in the proof : t25_finset_1 t100_zfmisc_1 t24_finset_1 t92_zfmisc_1 t13_finset_1 l22_finset_1
% 0.21/0.49  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------