TSTP Solution File: SEU090+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SEU090+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 09:20:12 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.57s 0.76s
% Output : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 11 unt; 1 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 148 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 85 ( 32 ~; 19 |; 29 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 67 ( 67 fml; 0 var)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 1 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 9 usr; 5 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 49 ( 36 !; 12 ?; 10 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_19,type,
sQ7_eqProxy:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).
tff(f130,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f129,f95]) ).
tff(f95,plain,
finite(sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).
tff(f88,plain,
( ~ finite(cartesian_product4(sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3))
& finite(sK3)
& finite(sK2)
& finite(sK1)
& finite(sK0) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f73,f87]) ).
tff(f87,plain,
( ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ finite(cartesian_product4(X0,X1,X2,X3))
& finite(X3)
& finite(X2)
& finite(X1)
& finite(X0) )
=> ( ~ finite(cartesian_product4(sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3))
& finite(sK3)
& finite(sK2)
& finite(sK1)
& finite(sK0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
tff(f73,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ finite(cartesian_product4(X0,X1,X2,X3))
& finite(X3)
& finite(X2)
& finite(X1)
& finite(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f72]) ).
tff(f72,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ finite(cartesian_product4(X0,X1,X2,X3))
& finite(X3)
& finite(X2)
& finite(X1)
& finite(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).
tff(f57,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( finite(X3)
& finite(X2)
& finite(X1)
& finite(X0) )
=> finite(cartesian_product4(X0,X1,X2,X3)) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f56]) ).
tff(f56,conjecture,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( finite(X3)
& finite(X2)
& finite(X1)
& finite(X0) )
=> finite(cartesian_product4(X0,X1,X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uhEuZdrm6p/Vampire---4.8_10685',t21_finset_1) ).
tff(f129,plain,
~ finite(sK0),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f128,f96]) ).
tff(f96,plain,
finite(sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).
tff(f128,plain,
( ~ finite(sK1)
| ~ finite(sK0) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f127,f97]) ).
tff(f97,plain,
finite(sK2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).
tff(f127,plain,
( ~ finite(sK2)
| ~ finite(sK1)
| ~ finite(sK0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f102,f123]) ).
tff(f123,plain,
~ finite(cartesian_product3(sK0,sK1,sK2)),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f122,f98]) ).
tff(f98,plain,
finite(sK3),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).
tff(f122,plain,
( ~ finite(sK3)
| ~ finite(cartesian_product3(sK0,sK1,sK2)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f103,f116]) ).
tff(f116,plain,
~ finite(cartesian_product2(cartesian_product3(sK0,sK1,sK2),sK3)),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f99,f101]) ).
tff(f101,plain,
! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] : ( cartesian_product4(X0,X1,X2,X3) = cartesian_product2(cartesian_product3(X0,X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).
tff(f14,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] : ( cartesian_product4(X0,X1,X2,X3) = cartesian_product2(cartesian_product3(X0,X1,X2),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uhEuZdrm6p/Vampire---4.8_10685',d4_zfmisc_1) ).
tff(f99,plain,
~ finite(cartesian_product4(sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).
tff(f103,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( finite(cartesian_product2(X0,X1))
| ~ finite(X1)
| ~ finite(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f79]) ).
tff(f79,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( finite(cartesian_product2(X0,X1))
| ~ finite(X1)
| ~ finite(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f78]) ).
tff(f78,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( finite(cartesian_product2(X0,X1))
| ~ finite(X1)
| ~ finite(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).
tff(f53,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( finite(X1)
& finite(X0) )
=> finite(cartesian_product2(X0,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uhEuZdrm6p/Vampire---4.8_10685',t19_finset_1) ).
tff(f102,plain,
! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( finite(cartesian_product3(X0,X1,X2))
| ~ finite(X2)
| ~ finite(X1)
| ~ finite(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).
tff(f77,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( finite(cartesian_product3(X0,X1,X2))
| ~ finite(X2)
| ~ finite(X1)
| ~ finite(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f76]) ).
tff(f76,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( finite(cartesian_product3(X0,X1,X2))
| ~ finite(X2)
| ~ finite(X1)
| ~ finite(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).
tff(f55,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( finite(X2)
& finite(X1)
& finite(X0) )
=> finite(cartesian_product3(X0,X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uhEuZdrm6p/Vampire---4.8_10685',t20_finset_1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : SEU090+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 11:26:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.37 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.37 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uhEuZdrm6p/Vampire---4.8_10685
% 0.57/0.76 % (10941)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10947)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10941)First to succeed.
% 0.57/0.76 % (10943)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10942)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10944)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10945)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10946)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10941)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-10937"
% 0.57/0.76 % (10946)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.57/0.76 % (10945)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (10945)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (10945)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10941)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.57/0.76 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.57/0.76 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.57/0.76 % (10941)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (10941)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10941)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.57/0.76
% 0.57/0.76 % (10941)Memory used [KB]: 1058
% 0.57/0.76 % (10941)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.57/0.76 % (10941)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10937)Success in time 0.383 s
% 0.57/0.76 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------