TSTP Solution File: SEU090+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU090+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:35 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 7.00s 2.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   58
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   71 (   9 unt;  54 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   34 (  15   ~;  10   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   36 (  27   >;   9   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   20 (  18 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   36 (  36 usr;  27 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (;  26   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subset > in > element > transfinite_sequence > relation_non_empty > relation_empty_yielding > relation > ordinal_yielding > ordinal > one_to_one > natural > function_yielding > function > finite > epsilon_transitive > epsilon_connected > empty > being_limit_ordinal > cartesian_product4 > cartesian_product3 > cartesian_product2 > #nlpp > powerset > positive_rationals > empty_set > #skF_9 > #skF_18 > #skF_11 > #skF_15 > #skF_1 > #skF_25 > #skF_19 > #skF_7 > #skF_10 > #skF_16 > #skF_26 > #skF_14 > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_13 > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_21 > #skF_8 > #skF_30 > #skF_4 > #skF_17 > #skF_22 > #skF_29 > #skF_28 > #skF_24 > #skF_27 > #skF_23 > #skF_12 > #skF_20

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(epsilon_connected,type,
    epsilon_connected: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i > $i ).

tff(relation,type,
    relation: $i > $o ).

tff(cartesian_product4,type,
    cartesian_product4: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(positive_rationals,type,
    positive_rationals: $i ).

tff('#skF_18',type,
    '#skF_18': $i ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': $i ).

tff(relation_non_empty,type,
    relation_non_empty: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_25',type,
    '#skF_25': $i ).

tff(epsilon_transitive,type,
    epsilon_transitive: $i > $o ).

tff(cartesian_product3,type,
    cartesian_product3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(element,type,
    element: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(finite,type,
    finite: $i > $o ).

tff(one_to_one,type,
    one_to_one: $i > $o ).

tff(ordinal_yielding,type,
    ordinal_yielding: $i > $o ).

tff(function,type,
    function: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_19',type,
    '#skF_19': $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff(relation_empty_yielding,type,
    relation_empty_yielding: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i ).

tff('#skF_16',type,
    '#skF_16': $i ).

tff(ordinal,type,
    ordinal: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_26',type,
    '#skF_26': $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_21',type,
    '#skF_21': $i ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff(function_yielding,type,
    function_yielding: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i ).

tff('#skF_30',type,
    '#skF_30': $i ).

tff(being_limit_ordinal,type,
    being_limit_ordinal: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff('#skF_17',type,
    '#skF_17': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_22',type,
    '#skF_22': $i ).

tff('#skF_29',type,
    '#skF_29': $i ).

tff('#skF_28',type,
    '#skF_28': $i ).

tff('#skF_24',type,
    '#skF_24': $i ).

tff('#skF_27',type,
    '#skF_27': $i ).

tff('#skF_23',type,
    '#skF_23': $i ).

tff(powerset,type,
    powerset: $i > $i ).

tff(natural,type,
    natural: $i > $o ).

tff(transfinite_sequence,type,
    transfinite_sequence: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': $i > $i ).

tff(cartesian_product2,type,
    cartesian_product2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_20',type,
    '#skF_20': $i > $i ).

tff(f_424,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C,D] :
        ( ( finite(A)
          & finite(B)
          & finite(C)
          & finite(D) )
       => finite(cartesian_product4(A,B,C,D)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t21_finset_1) ).

tff(f_413,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( finite(A)
        & finite(B)
        & finite(C) )
     => finite(cartesian_product3(A,B,C)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t20_finset_1) ).

tff(f_123,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C,D] : ( cartesian_product4(A,B,C,D) = cartesian_product2(cartesian_product3(A,B,C),D) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_zfmisc_1) ).

tff(f_401,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( finite(A)
        & finite(B) )
     => finite(cartesian_product2(A,B)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t19_finset_1) ).

tff(c_286,plain,
    finite('#skF_27'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_424]) ).

tff(c_284,plain,
    finite('#skF_28'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_424]) ).

tff(c_282,plain,
    finite('#skF_29'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_424]) ).

tff(c_276,plain,
    ! [A_56,B_57,C_58] :
      ( finite(cartesian_product3(A_56,B_57,C_58))
      | ~ finite(C_58)
      | ~ finite(B_57)
      | ~ finite(A_56) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_413]) ).

tff(c_280,plain,
    finite('#skF_30'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_424]) ).

tff(c_1100,plain,
    ! [A_183,B_184,C_185,D_186] : ( cartesian_product2(cartesian_product3(A_183,B_184,C_185),D_186) = cartesian_product4(A_183,B_184,C_185,D_186) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_123]) ).

tff(c_272,plain,
    ! [A_52,B_53] :
      ( finite(cartesian_product2(A_52,B_53))
      | ~ finite(B_53)
      | ~ finite(A_52) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_401]) ).

tff(c_1367,plain,
    ! [A_256,B_257,C_258,D_259] :
      ( finite(cartesian_product4(A_256,B_257,C_258,D_259))
      | ~ finite(D_259)
      | ~ finite(cartesian_product3(A_256,B_257,C_258)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1100,c_272]) ).

tff(c_278,plain,
    ~ finite(cartesian_product4('#skF_27','#skF_28','#skF_29','#skF_30')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_424]) ).

tff(c_1370,plain,
    ( ~ finite('#skF_30')
    | ~ finite(cartesian_product3('#skF_27','#skF_28','#skF_29')) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1367,c_278]) ).

tff(c_1373,plain,
    ~ finite(cartesian_product3('#skF_27','#skF_28','#skF_29')),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_280,c_1370]) ).

tff(c_1376,plain,
    ( ~ finite('#skF_29')
    | ~ finite('#skF_28')
    | ~ finite('#skF_27') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_276,c_1373]) ).

tff(c_1383,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_286,c_284,c_282,c_1376]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : SEU090+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 11:53:34 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 7.00/2.63  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.00/2.64  
% 7.00/2.64  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.08/2.67  
% 7.08/2.67  Inference rules
% 7.08/2.67  ----------------------
% 7.08/2.67  #Ref     : 0
% 7.08/2.67  #Sup     : 210
% 7.08/2.67  #Fact    : 0
% 7.08/2.67  #Define  : 0
% 7.08/2.67  #Split   : 11
% 7.08/2.67  #Chain   : 0
% 7.08/2.67  #Close   : 0
% 7.08/2.67  
% 7.08/2.67  Ordering : KBO
% 7.08/2.67  
% 7.08/2.67  Simplification rules
% 7.08/2.67  ----------------------
% 7.08/2.67  #Subsume      : 47
% 7.08/2.67  #Demod        : 137
% 7.08/2.67  #Tautology    : 105
% 7.08/2.67  #SimpNegUnit  : 7
% 7.08/2.67  #BackRed      : 36
% 7.08/2.67  
% 7.08/2.67  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 7.08/2.67  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 7.08/2.67  
% 7.08/2.67  Timing (in seconds)
% 7.08/2.67  ----------------------
% 7.08/2.67  Preprocessing        : 0.65
% 7.08/2.67  Parsing              : 0.34
% 7.08/2.67  CNF conversion       : 0.06
% 7.08/2.67  Main loop            : 0.88
% 7.08/2.67  Inferencing          : 0.32
% 7.08/2.67  Reduction            : 0.29
% 7.08/2.67  Demodulation         : 0.20
% 7.08/2.67  BG Simplification    : 0.04
% 7.08/2.67  Subsumption          : 0.15
% 7.08/2.67  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 7.08/2.67  MUC search           : 0.00
% 7.08/2.67  Cooper               : 0.00
% 7.08/2.67  Total                : 1.58
% 7.08/2.67  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 7.08/2.67  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 7.08/2.67  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 7.08/2.67  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------