TSTP Solution File: SEU075+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU075+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:38:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 10.13s 2.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   45 (  28 unt;   3 nHn;  45 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  113 (  39 equ;  67 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    ( in(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_dom(X1))
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_77,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | in(esk19_2(X1,X2),relation_dom(X1))
    | relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_77) ).

cnf(i_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk18_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_61) ).

cnf(i_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    relation_dom(esk18_0) = esk15_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_57) ).

cnf(i_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk18_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_60) ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk1_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X3
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    relation_rng(esk16_0) = esk15_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_59) ).

cnf(i_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk16_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_65) ).

cnf(i_0_64,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk16_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_64) ).

cnf(i_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    relation_dom(esk17_0) = esk15_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_58) ).

cnf(i_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk17_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_63) ).

cnf(i_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk17_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_62) ).

cnf(i_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    esk18_0 != esk17_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_55) ).

cnf(i_0_67,plain,
    ( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3))
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_67) ).

cnf(i_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    relation_composition(esk16_0,esk18_0) = relation_composition(esk16_0,esk17_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_56) ).

cnf(i_0_76,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(X2)
    | apply(X1,esk19_2(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,esk19_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-29tygmt1/lgb.p',i_0_76) ).

cnf(c_0_94,plain,
    ( in(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_dom(X1))
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_95,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | in(esk19_2(X1,X2),relation_dom(X1))
    | relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_77 ).

cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk18_0),
    i_0_61 ).

cnf(c_0_97,negated_conjecture,
    relation_dom(esk18_0) = esk15_0,
    i_0_57 ).

cnf(c_0_98,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk18_0),
    i_0_60 ).

cnf(c_0_99,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk1_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X3
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_100,plain,
    ( in(esk1_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2),relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_94]) ).

cnf(c_0_101,negated_conjecture,
    relation_rng(esk16_0) = esk15_0,
    i_0_59 ).

cnf(c_0_102,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk16_0),
    i_0_65 ).

cnf(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk16_0),
    i_0_64 ).

cnf(c_0_104,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk18_0
    | in(esk19_2(X1,esk18_0),relation_dom(X1))
    | relation_dom(X1) != esk15_0
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_96]),c_0_97]),c_0_98])]) ).

cnf(c_0_105,negated_conjecture,
    relation_dom(esk17_0) = esk15_0,
    i_0_58 ).

cnf(c_0_106,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk17_0),
    i_0_63 ).

cnf(c_0_107,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk17_0),
    i_0_62 ).

cnf(c_0_108,negated_conjecture,
    esk18_0 != esk17_0,
    i_0_55 ).

cnf(c_0_109,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk1_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2)) = X2
    | ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_99]) ).

cnf(c_0_110,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_3(esk16_0,esk15_0,X1),relation_dom(esk16_0))
    | ~ in(X1,esk15_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_101]),c_0_102]),c_0_103])]) ).

cnf(c_0_111,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk19_2(esk17_0,esk18_0),esk15_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_104,c_0_105]),c_0_106]),c_0_107])]),c_0_108]) ).

cnf(c_0_112,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(esk16_0,esk1_3(esk16_0,esk15_0,X1)) = X1
    | ~ in(X1,esk15_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_101]),c_0_102]),c_0_103])]) ).

cnf(c_0_113,plain,
    ( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3))
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1)) ),
    i_0_67 ).

cnf(c_0_114,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk1_3(esk16_0,esk15_0,esk19_2(esk17_0,esk18_0)),relation_dom(esk16_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_110,c_0_111]) ).

cnf(c_0_115,negated_conjecture,
    apply(esk16_0,esk1_3(esk16_0,esk15_0,esk19_2(esk17_0,esk18_0))) = esk19_2(esk17_0,esk18_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_112,c_0_111]) ).

cnf(c_0_116,plain,
    ( apply(relation_composition(esk16_0,X1),esk1_3(esk16_0,esk15_0,esk19_2(esk17_0,esk18_0))) = apply(X1,esk19_2(esk17_0,esk18_0))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_113,c_0_114]),c_0_102]),c_0_103])]),c_0_115]) ).

cnf(c_0_117,negated_conjecture,
    relation_composition(esk16_0,esk18_0) = relation_composition(esk16_0,esk17_0),
    i_0_56 ).

cnf(c_0_118,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(X2)
    | apply(X1,esk19_2(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,esk19_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_76 ).

cnf(c_0_119,negated_conjecture,
    apply(relation_composition(esk16_0,esk17_0),esk1_3(esk16_0,esk15_0,esk19_2(esk17_0,esk18_0))) = apply(esk18_0,esk19_2(esk17_0,esk18_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_96]),c_0_117]),c_0_98])]) ).

cnf(c_0_120,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk18_0
    | apply(X1,esk19_2(X1,esk18_0)) != apply(esk18_0,esk19_2(X1,esk18_0))
    | relation_dom(X1) != esk15_0
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_118,c_0_96]),c_0_97]),c_0_98])]) ).

cnf(c_0_121,negated_conjecture,
    apply(esk18_0,esk19_2(esk17_0,esk18_0)) = apply(esk17_0,esk19_2(esk17_0,esk18_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_106]),c_0_107])]),c_0_119]) ).

cnf(c_0_122,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_120,c_0_121]),c_0_105]),c_0_106]),c_0_107])]),c_0_108]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : SEU075+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 08:04:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 10.13/2.59  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 10.13/2.59  # No SInE strategy applied
% 10.13/2.59  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 10.13/2.59  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S064I
% 10.13/2.59  # and selection function SelectComplexG.
% 10.13/2.59  #
% 10.13/2.59  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 10.13/2.59  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 10.13/2.59  
% 10.13/2.59  # Proof found!
% 10.13/2.59  # SZS status Theorem
% 10.13/2.59  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.13/2.59  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.13/2.59  
% 10.13/2.59  # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.13/2.59  # User time                : 0.292 s
% 10.13/2.59  # System time              : 0.037 s
% 10.13/2.59  # Total time               : 0.329 s
% 10.13/2.59  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 10.13/2.59  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------