TSTP Solution File: SEU055+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU055+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:16:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 2.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  120 (  42 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   23 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  135 (  54   ~;  55   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (   6 sgn  33   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t124_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1) )
     => ( ! [X2,X3] : relation_image(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) = set_difference(relation_image(X1,X2),relation_image(X1,X3))
       => one_to_one(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t124_funct_1) ).

fof(t117_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2) )
     => ( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
       => relation_image(X2,singleton(X1)) = singleton(apply(X2,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t117_funct_1) ).

fof(d8_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1) )
     => ( one_to_one(X1)
      <=> ! [X2,X3] :
            ( ( in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
              & in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
              & apply(X1,X2) = apply(X1,X3) )
           => X2 = X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

fof(t37_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( set_difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
    <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t37_xboole_1) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(t20_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( set_difference(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)) = singleton(X1)
    <=> X1 != X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t20_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( relation(X1)
          & function(X1) )
       => ( ! [X2,X3] : relation_image(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) = set_difference(relation_image(X1,X2),relation_image(X1,X3))
         => one_to_one(X1) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t124_funct_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( relation(esk15_0)
      & function(esk15_0)
      & relation_image(esk15_0,set_difference(X5,X6)) = set_difference(relation_image(esk15_0,X5),relation_image(esk15_0,X6))
      & ~ one_to_one(esk15_0) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ relation(X4)
      | ~ function(X4)
      | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X4))
      | relation_image(X4,singleton(X3)) = singleton(apply(X4,X3)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t117_funct_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    relation_image(esk15_0,set_difference(X1,X2)) = set_difference(relation_image(esk15_0,X1),relation_image(esk15_0,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( relation_image(X1,singleton(X2)) = singleton(apply(X1,X2))
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk15_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk15_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( ~ one_to_one(X4)
        | ~ in(X5,relation_dom(X4))
        | ~ in(X6,relation_dom(X4))
        | apply(X4,X5) != apply(X4,X6)
        | X5 = X6
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4) )
      & ( in(esk2_1(X4),relation_dom(X4))
        | one_to_one(X4)
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4) )
      & ( in(esk3_1(X4),relation_dom(X4))
        | one_to_one(X4)
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4) )
      & ( apply(X4,esk2_1(X4)) = apply(X4,esk3_1(X4))
        | one_to_one(X4)
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4) )
      & ( esk2_1(X4) != esk3_1(X4)
        | one_to_one(X4)
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
      ( ( set_difference(X3,X4) != empty_set
        | subset(X3,X4) )
      & ( ~ subset(X3,X4)
        | set_difference(X3,X4) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t37_xboole_1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X3] : subset(X3,X3),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(relation_image(esk15_0,X1),singleton(apply(esk15_0,X2))) = relation_image(esk15_0,set_difference(X1,singleton(X2)))
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( one_to_one(X1)
    | apply(X1,esk2_1(X1)) = apply(X1,esk3_1(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ one_to_one(esk15_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( set_difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(relation_image(esk15_0,X1),singleton(apply(esk15_0,esk2_1(esk15_0)))) = relation_image(esk15_0,set_difference(X1,singleton(esk3_1(esk15_0))))
    | ~ in(esk3_1(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    set_difference(X1,X1) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
      ( ( set_difference(singleton(X3),singleton(X4)) != singleton(X3)
        | X3 != X4 )
      & ( X3 = X4
        | set_difference(singleton(X3),singleton(X4)) = singleton(X3) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t20_zfmisc_1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_image(esk15_0,set_difference(X1,singleton(esk3_1(esk15_0)))) = relation_image(esk15_0,set_difference(X1,singleton(esk2_1(esk15_0))))
    | ~ in(esk2_1(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk15_0))
    | ~ in(esk3_1(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    relation_image(esk15_0,empty_set) = empty_set,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_22]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( X1 != X2
    | set_difference(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)) != singleton(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_image(esk15_0,set_difference(singleton(esk3_1(esk15_0)),singleton(esk2_1(esk15_0)))) = empty_set
    | ~ in(esk2_1(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk15_0))
    | ~ in(esk3_1(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_22]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( set_difference(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)) = singleton(X1)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    set_difference(singleton(X1),singleton(X1)) != singleton(X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_image(esk15_0,singleton(esk3_1(esk15_0))) = empty_set
    | esk3_1(esk15_0) = esk2_1(esk15_0)
    | ~ in(esk2_1(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk15_0))
    | ~ in(esk3_1(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    singleton(X1) != empty_set,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk3_1(esk15_0) = esk2_1(esk15_0)
    | ~ in(esk3_1(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk15_0))
    | ~ in(esk2_1(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_30]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( one_to_one(X1)
    | in(esk3_1(X1),relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk3_1(esk15_0) = esk2_1(esk15_0)
    | ~ in(esk2_1(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( one_to_one(X1)
    | in(esk2_1(X1),relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( one_to_one(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | esk2_1(X1) != esk3_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_1(esk15_0) = esk2_1(esk15_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_18]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SEU055+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 05:43:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/2.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/2.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 0.22/2.41  
% 0.22/2.41  # Proof found!
% 0.22/2.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/2.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/2.41  # Proof object total steps             : 39
% 0.22/2.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 26
% 0.22/2.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 13
% 0.22/2.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 17
% 0.22/2.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 14
% 0.22/2.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.22/2.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 13
% 0.22/2.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 0.22/2.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 11
% 0.22/2.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 27
% 0.22/2.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/2.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 40
% 0.22/2.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/2.41  # Initial clauses                      : 69
% 0.22/2.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.22/2.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 67
% 0.22/2.41  # Processed clauses                    : 1951
% 0.22/2.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 0.22/2.41  # ...subsumed                          : 1066
% 0.22/2.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 880
% 0.22/2.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
% 0.22/2.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/2.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 43
% 0.22/2.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 197
% 0.22/2.41  # Generated clauses                    : 24990
% 0.22/2.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 12268
% 0.22/2.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 906
% 0.22/2.41  # Paramodulations                      : 24953
% 0.22/2.41  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.22/2.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 35
% 0.22/2.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 638
% 0.22/2.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 42
% 0.22/2.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/2.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 19
% 0.22/2.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 577
% 0.22/2.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3064
% 0.22/2.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 12181
% 0.22/2.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/2.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 240
% 0.22/2.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 417583
% 0.22/2.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 101916
% 0.22/2.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1741
% 0.22/2.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 523
% 0.22/2.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/2.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 14
% 0.22/2.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 7
% 0.22/2.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/2.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/2.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 7839957
% 0.22/2.41  
% 0.22/2.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/2.41  # User time                : 1.045 s
% 0.22/2.41  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.22/2.41  # Total time               : 1.055 s
% 0.22/2.41  # Maximum resident set size: 19064 pages
% 0.22/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------