TSTP Solution File: SEU055+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SEU055+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:30:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  110 (  41 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   23 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  116 (  45   ~;  45   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   2 sgn;  29   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t124_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1) )
     => ( ! [X2,X3] : relation_image(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) = set_difference(relation_image(X1,X2),relation_image(X1,X3))
       => one_to_one(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eiqSsYnGyj/E---3.1_21229.p',t124_funct_1) ).

fof(d8_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1) )
     => ( one_to_one(X1)
      <=> ! [X2,X3] :
            ( ( in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
              & in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
              & apply(X1,X2) = apply(X1,X3) )
           => X2 = X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eiqSsYnGyj/E---3.1_21229.p',d8_funct_1) ).

fof(t117_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2) )
     => ( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
       => relation_image(X2,singleton(X1)) = singleton(apply(X2,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eiqSsYnGyj/E---3.1_21229.p',t117_funct_1) ).

fof(t20_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( set_difference(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)) = singleton(X1)
    <=> X1 != X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eiqSsYnGyj/E---3.1_21229.p',t20_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t37_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( set_difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
    <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eiqSsYnGyj/E---3.1_21229.p',t37_xboole_1) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eiqSsYnGyj/E---3.1_21229.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( relation(X1)
          & function(X1) )
       => ( ! [X2,X3] : relation_image(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) = set_difference(relation_image(X1,X2),relation_image(X1,X3))
         => one_to_one(X1) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t124_funct_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X8,X9,X10] :
      ( ( ~ one_to_one(X8)
        | ~ in(X9,relation_dom(X8))
        | ~ in(X10,relation_dom(X8))
        | apply(X8,X9) != apply(X8,X10)
        | X9 = X10
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | ~ function(X8) )
      & ( in(esk2_1(X8),relation_dom(X8))
        | one_to_one(X8)
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | ~ function(X8) )
      & ( in(esk3_1(X8),relation_dom(X8))
        | one_to_one(X8)
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | ~ function(X8) )
      & ( apply(X8,esk2_1(X8)) = apply(X8,esk3_1(X8))
        | one_to_one(X8)
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | ~ function(X8) )
      & ( esk2_1(X8) != esk3_1(X8)
        | one_to_one(X8)
        | ~ relation(X8)
        | ~ function(X8) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_funct_1])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( relation(esk1_0)
      & function(esk1_0)
      & relation_image(esk1_0,set_difference(X5,X6)) = set_difference(relation_image(esk1_0,X5),relation_image(esk1_0,X6))
      & ~ one_to_one(esk1_0) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X22,X23] :
      ( ~ relation(X23)
      | ~ function(X23)
      | ~ in(X22,relation_dom(X23))
      | relation_image(X23,singleton(X22)) = singleton(apply(X23,X22)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t117_funct_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( in(esk2_1(X1),relation_dom(X1))
    | one_to_one(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ one_to_one(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X16,X17] :
      ( ( set_difference(singleton(X16),singleton(X17)) != singleton(X16)
        | X16 != X17 )
      & ( X16 = X17
        | set_difference(singleton(X16),singleton(X17)) = singleton(X16) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t20_zfmisc_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X18,X19] :
      ( ( set_difference(X18,X19) != empty_set
        | subset(X18,X19) )
      & ( ~ subset(X18,X19)
        | set_difference(X18,X19) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t37_xboole_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X64] : subset(X64,X64),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( in(esk3_1(X1),relation_dom(X1))
    | one_to_one(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk2_1(X1)) = apply(X1,esk3_1(X1))
    | one_to_one(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( relation_image(X1,singleton(X2)) = singleton(apply(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk2_1(esk1_0),relation_dom(esk1_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( set_difference(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)) != singleton(X1)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( set_difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    relation_image(esk1_0,set_difference(X1,X2)) = set_difference(relation_image(esk1_0,X1),relation_image(esk1_0,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | set_difference(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)) = singleton(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk3_1(esk1_0),relation_dom(esk1_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    apply(esk1_0,esk3_1(esk1_0)) = apply(esk1_0,esk2_1(esk1_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(apply(esk1_0,esk2_1(esk1_0))) = relation_image(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_1(esk1_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    set_difference(singleton(X1),singleton(X1)) != singleton(X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    set_difference(X1,X1) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(relation_image(esk1_0,singleton(X1)),relation_image(esk1_0,singleton(X2))) = relation_image(esk1_0,singleton(X1))
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    relation_image(esk1_0,singleton(esk3_1(esk1_0))) = relation_image(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_1(esk1_0))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_26]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    singleton(X1) != empty_set,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( one_to_one(X1)
    | esk2_1(X1) != esk3_1(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(relation_image(esk1_0,singleton(X1)),relation_image(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_1(esk1_0)))) = relation_image(esk1_0,singleton(X1))
    | X1 = esk3_1(esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    relation_image(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_1(esk1_0))) != empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_1(esk1_0) != esk2_1(esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_37]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SEU055+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 09:10:00 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eiqSsYnGyj/E---3.1_21229.p
% 0.21/0.53  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # sh5l with pid 21362 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.53  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with pid 21374 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.53  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.53  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 40
% 0.21/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 69
% 0.21/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.21/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 67
% 0.21/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 325
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 34
% 0.21/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 40
% 0.21/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 251
% 0.21/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 8
% 0.21/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 0.21/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 49
% 0.21/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 1036
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1009
% 0.21/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.21/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 1028
% 0.21/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 8
% 0.21/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 347
% 0.21/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 193
% 0.21/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 105
% 0.21/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 16
% 0.21/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 72
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 705
% 0.21/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1507
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 55
% 0.21/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 826
% 0.21/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 595
% 0.21/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 19
% 0.21/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 269
% 0.21/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 713
% 0.21/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 9
% 0.21/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 23087
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  # User time                : 0.026 s
% 0.21/0.53  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Total time               : 0.033 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1888 pages
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  # User time                : 0.030 s
% 0.21/0.53  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Total time               : 0.037 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.21/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------