TSTP Solution File: SEU047+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SEU047+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 17:03:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 1.93s 1.16s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   81 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   87 (  34   ~;  25   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   0 sgn;  30   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f31,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( function(X2)
        & relation(X2) )
     => ( subset(X0,X1)
       => ( relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X0,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
          & relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t97_funct_1) ).

fof(f32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( function(X2)
          & relation(X2) )
       => ( subset(X0,X1)
         => ( relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X0,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
            & relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f33,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ( subset(X0,X1)
       => relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t129_relat_1) ).

fof(f34,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ( subset(X0,X1)
       => relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X0,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t130_relat_1) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) != relation_rng_restriction(X0,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
        | relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) != relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)) )
      & subset(X0,X1)
      & function(X2)
      & relation(X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) != relation_rng_restriction(X0,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
        | relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) != relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)) )
      & subset(X0,X1)
      & function(X2)
      & relation(X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f58]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2))
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2))
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f60]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X0,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X0,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f62]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) != relation_rng_restriction(X0,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
          | relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) != relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)) )
        & subset(X0,X1)
        & function(X2)
        & relation(X2) )
   => ( ( relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13) != relation_rng_restriction(sK11,relation_rng_restriction(sK12,sK13))
        | relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13) != relation_rng_restriction(sK12,relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13)) )
      & subset(sK11,sK12)
      & function(sK13)
      & relation(sK13) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ( ( relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13) != relation_rng_restriction(sK11,relation_rng_restriction(sK12,sK13))
      | relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13) != relation_rng_restriction(sK12,relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13)) )
    & subset(sK11,sK12)
    & function(sK13)
    & relation(sK13) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK11,sK12,sK13])],[f59,f87]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    relation(sK13),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f134,plain,
    subset(sK11,sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    ( relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13) != relation_rng_restriction(sK11,relation_rng_restriction(sK12,sK13))
    | relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13) != relation_rng_restriction(sK12,relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2))
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X0,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).

cnf(c_90,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_rng_restriction(sK11,relation_rng_restriction(sK12,sK13)) != relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13)
    | relation_rng_restriction(sK12,relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13)) != relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f135]) ).

cnf(c_91,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK11,sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

cnf(c_93,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK13),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f132]) ).

cnf(c_94,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2)) = relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f136]) ).

cnf(c_95,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | relation_rng_restriction(X0,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)) = relation_rng_restriction(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).

cnf(c_1923,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X0)
    | relation_rng_restriction(sK12,relation_rng_restriction(sK11,X0)) = relation_rng_restriction(sK11,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_91,c_94]) ).

cnf(c_1946,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X0)
    | relation_rng_restriction(sK11,relation_rng_restriction(sK12,X0)) = relation_rng_restriction(sK11,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_91,c_95]) ).

cnf(c_1996,plain,
    relation_rng_restriction(sK12,relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13)) = relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_93,c_1923]) ).

cnf(c_1999,plain,
    relation_rng_restriction(sK11,relation_rng_restriction(sK12,sK13)) != relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_1996]) ).

cnf(c_2012,plain,
    relation_rng_restriction(sK11,relation_rng_restriction(sK12,sK13)) = relation_rng_restriction(sK11,sK13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_93,c_1946]) ).

cnf(c_2013,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2012,c_1999]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU047+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 21:52:21 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.93/1.16  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.93/1.16  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  ------  iProver source info
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 1.93/1.16  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 1.93/1.16  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.93/1.16  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  ------ Parsing...
% 1.93/1.16  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 8 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.93/1.16  ------ Proving...
% 1.93/1.16  ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  clauses                                 37
% 1.93/1.16  conjectures                             3
% 1.93/1.16  EPR                                     25
% 1.93/1.16  Horn                                    35
% 1.93/1.16  unary                                   20
% 1.93/1.16  binary                                  11
% 1.93/1.16  lits                                    60
% 1.93/1.16  lits eq                                 6
% 1.93/1.16  fd_pure                                 0
% 1.93/1.16  fd_pseudo                               0
% 1.93/1.16  fd_cond                                 1
% 1.93/1.16  fd_pseudo_cond                          1
% 1.93/1.16  AC symbols                              0
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  ------ 
% 1.93/1.16  Current options:
% 1.93/1.16  ------ 
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  ------ Proving...
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.93/1.16  
% 1.93/1.16  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------