TSTP Solution File: SEU047+1 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : SEU047+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 00:43:37 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 1.11s
% Output : Solution 1.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18363/SEU047+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18363/SEU047+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18363/SEU047+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 18459
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.01 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(relation(X3)=>(subset(X1,X2)=>relation_rng_restriction(X2,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3))=relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t129_relat_1)).
% fof(6, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(relation(X3)=>(subset(X1,X2)=>relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3))=relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t130_relat_1)).
% fof(33, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((relation(X3)&function(X3))=>(subset(X1,X2)=>(relation_rng_restriction(X2,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3))=relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3)&relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3))=relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t97_funct_1)).
% fof(34, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((relation(X3)&function(X3))=>(subset(X1,X2)=>(relation_rng_restriction(X2,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3))=relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3)&relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3))=relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[33])).
% fof(54, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(relation(X3))|(~(subset(X1,X2))|relation_rng_restriction(X2,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3))=relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5])).
% fof(55, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(relation(X6))|(~(subset(X4,X5))|relation_rng_restriction(X5,relation_rng_restriction(X4,X6))=relation_rng_restriction(X4,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[54])).
% cnf(56,plain,(relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3))=relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3)|~subset(X2,X1)|~relation(X3)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[55])).
% fof(57, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(relation(X3))|(~(subset(X1,X2))|relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3))=relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[6])).
% fof(58, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(relation(X6))|(~(subset(X4,X5))|relation_rng_restriction(X4,relation_rng_restriction(X5,X6))=relation_rng_restriction(X4,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[57])).
% cnf(59,plain,(relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3))=relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3)|~subset(X1,X2)|~relation(X3)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[58])).
% fof(149, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:?[X3]:((relation(X3)&function(X3))&(subset(X1,X2)&(~(relation_rng_restriction(X2,relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3))=relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3))|~(relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3))=relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[34])).
% fof(150, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:?[X5]:?[X6]:((relation(X6)&function(X6))&(subset(X4,X5)&(~(relation_rng_restriction(X5,relation_rng_restriction(X4,X6))=relation_rng_restriction(X4,X6))|~(relation_rng_restriction(X4,relation_rng_restriction(X5,X6))=relation_rng_restriction(X4,X6))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[149])).
% fof(151, negated_conjecture,((relation(esk14_0)&function(esk14_0))&(subset(esk12_0,esk13_0)&(~(relation_rng_restriction(esk13_0,relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0))=relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0))|~(relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,relation_rng_restriction(esk13_0,esk14_0))=relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[150])).
% cnf(152,negated_conjecture,(relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,relation_rng_restriction(esk13_0,esk14_0))!=relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0)|relation_rng_restriction(esk13_0,relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0))!=relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[151])).
% cnf(153,negated_conjecture,(subset(esk12_0,esk13_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[151])).
% cnf(155,negated_conjecture,(relation(esk14_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[151])).
% cnf(234,negated_conjecture,(relation_rng_restriction(esk13_0,relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,X1))=relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,X1)|~relation(X1)),inference(pm,[status(thm)],[56,153,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(236,negated_conjecture,(relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,relation_rng_restriction(esk13_0,X1))=relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,X1)|~relation(X1)),inference(pm,[status(thm)],[59,153,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(377,negated_conjecture,(relation_rng_restriction(esk13_0,relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0))=relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0)),inference(pm,[status(thm)],[234,155,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(405,negated_conjecture,(relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,relation_rng_restriction(esk13_0,esk14_0))=relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0)),inference(pm,[status(thm)],[236,155,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(503,negated_conjecture,(relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,relation_rng_restriction(esk13_0,esk14_0))!=relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[152,377,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(504,negated_conjecture,(relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,relation_rng_restriction(esk13_0,esk14_0))!=relation_rng_restriction(esk12_0,esk14_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[503,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(629,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[405,504,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(630,negated_conjecture,($false),629,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 172
% # ...of these trivial : 5
% # ...subsumed : 20
% # ...remaining for further processing: 147
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 23
% # Generated clauses : 356
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 312
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% # Paramodulations : 350
% # Factorizations : 0
% # Equation resolutions : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 123
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 70
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% # Negative unit clauses : 9
% # Non-unit-clauses : 44
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 169
% # ...number of literals in the above : 187
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 71
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 61
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 93
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 103
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 9
% # Backwards rewriting index: 138 leaves, 1.45+/-1.186 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 63 leaves, 1.21+/-1.299 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 118 leaves, 1.42+/-1.189 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 0.022 s
% # System time : 0.005 s
% # Total time : 0.027 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.14 CPU 0.20 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.14 CPU 0.20 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18363/SEU047+1.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------