TSTP Solution File: SEU047+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU047+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:33:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   21 (   0 equ;  12 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    relation(skc11),
    file('SEU047+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(23,axiom,
    subset(skc13,skc12),
    file('SEU047+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(49,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | ~ subset(v,w)
    | equal(relation_rng_restriction(w,relation_rng_restriction(v,u)),relation_rng_restriction(v,u)) ),
    file('SEU047+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(50,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | ~ subset(v,w)
    | equal(relation_rng_restriction(v,relation_rng_restriction(w,u)),relation_rng_restriction(v,u)) ),
    file('SEU047+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(51,axiom,
    ( ~ equal(relation_rng_restriction(skc12,relation_rng_restriction(skc13,skc11)),relation_rng_restriction(skc13,skc11))
    | ~ equal(relation_rng_restriction(skc13,relation_rng_restriction(skc12,skc11)),relation_rng_restriction(skc13,skc11)) ),
    file('SEU047+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(59,plain,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | equal(relation_rng_restriction(skc12,relation_rng_restriction(skc13,u)),relation_rng_restriction(skc13,u)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[23,49]),
    [iquote('0:Res:23.0,49.1')] ).

cnf(60,plain,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | equal(relation_rng_restriction(skc13,relation_rng_restriction(skc12,u)),relation_rng_restriction(skc13,u)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[23,50]),
    [iquote('0:Res:23.0,50.1')] ).

cnf(62,plain,
    equal(relation_rng_restriction(skc13,relation_rng_restriction(skc12,skc11)),relation_rng_restriction(skc13,skc11)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,60]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,60.0')] ).

cnf(63,plain,
    equal(relation_rng_restriction(skc12,relation_rng_restriction(skc13,skc11)),relation_rng_restriction(skc13,skc11)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,59]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,59.0')] ).

cnf(66,plain,
    ( ~ equal(relation_rng_restriction(skc12,relation_rng_restriction(skc13,skc11)),relation_rng_restriction(skc13,skc11))
    | ~ equal(relation_rng_restriction(skc13,skc11),relation_rng_restriction(skc13,skc11)) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[62,51]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:62.0,51.1')] ).

cnf(67,plain,
    ~ equal(relation_rng_restriction(skc12,relation_rng_restriction(skc13,skc11)),relation_rng_restriction(skc13,skc11)),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[66]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:66.1')] ).

cnf(68,plain,
    ~ equal(relation_rng_restriction(skc13,skc11),relation_rng_restriction(skc13,skc11)),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[63,67]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:63.0,67.0')] ).

cnf(69,plain,
    $false,
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[68]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:68.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU047+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 07:06:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS derived 13 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 57 clauses.
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS allocated 97705 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 13 :
% 0.19/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : t97_funct_1 t129_relat_1 t130_relat_1
% 0.19/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------