TSTP Solution File: SEU047+1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SEU047+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:32 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 4.40s 2.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 28
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 39 ( 6 unt; 25 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 13 ~; 7 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 17 ( 13 >; 4 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 12 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 (; 15 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subset > in > element > relation_empty_yielding > relation > one_to_one > function > empty > relation_rng_restriction > #nlpp > powerset > empty_set > #skF_5 > #skF_11 > #skF_1 > #skF_7 > #skF_10 > #skF_14 > #skF_13 > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_9 > #skF_8 > #skF_4 > #skF_6 > #skF_12
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_5',type,
'#skF_5': $i > $i ).
tff(relation,type,
relation: $i > $o ).
tff('#skF_11',type,
'#skF_11': $i ).
tff('#skF_1',type,
'#skF_1': $i > $i ).
tff(element,type,
element: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(one_to_one,type,
one_to_one: $i > $o ).
tff(relation_rng_restriction,type,
relation_rng_restriction: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(function,type,
function: $i > $o ).
tff('#skF_7',type,
'#skF_7': $i ).
tff(relation_empty_yielding,type,
relation_empty_yielding: $i > $o ).
tff('#skF_10',type,
'#skF_10': $i ).
tff(in,type,
in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff('#skF_14',type,
'#skF_14': $i ).
tff(subset,type,
subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff('#skF_13',type,
'#skF_13': $i ).
tff('#skF_2',type,
'#skF_2': $i ).
tff('#skF_3',type,
'#skF_3': $i ).
tff(empty,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
tff('#skF_9',type,
'#skF_9': $i ).
tff(empty_set,type,
empty_set: $i ).
tff('#skF_8',type,
'#skF_8': $i ).
tff('#skF_4',type,
'#skF_4': $i ).
tff(powerset,type,
powerset: $i > $i ).
tff('#skF_6',type,
'#skF_6': $i > $i ).
tff('#skF_12',type,
'#skF_12': $i ).
tff(f_183,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A,B,C] :
( ( relation(C)
& function(C) )
=> ( subset(A,B)
=> ( ( relation_rng_restriction(B,relation_rng_restriction(A,C)) = relation_rng_restriction(A,C) )
& ( relation_rng_restriction(A,relation_rng_restriction(B,C)) = relation_rng_restriction(A,C) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t97_funct_1) ).
tff(f_195,axiom,
! [A,B,C] :
( relation(C)
=> ( subset(A,B)
=> ( relation_rng_restriction(A,relation_rng_restriction(B,C)) = relation_rng_restriction(A,C) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t130_relat_1) ).
tff(f_189,axiom,
! [A,B,C] :
( relation(C)
=> ( subset(A,B)
=> ( relation_rng_restriction(B,relation_rng_restriction(A,C)) = relation_rng_restriction(A,C) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t129_relat_1) ).
tff(c_102,plain,
relation('#skF_14'),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_183]) ).
tff(c_98,plain,
subset('#skF_12','#skF_13'),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_183]) ).
tff(c_704,plain,
! [A_157,B_158,C_159] :
( ( relation_rng_restriction(A_157,relation_rng_restriction(B_158,C_159)) = relation_rng_restriction(A_157,C_159) )
| ~ subset(A_157,B_158)
| ~ relation(C_159) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_195]) ).
tff(c_428,plain,
! [B_108,A_109,C_110] :
( ( relation_rng_restriction(B_108,relation_rng_restriction(A_109,C_110)) = relation_rng_restriction(A_109,C_110) )
| ~ subset(A_109,B_108)
| ~ relation(C_110) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_189]) ).
tff(c_96,plain,
( ( relation_rng_restriction('#skF_12',relation_rng_restriction('#skF_13','#skF_14')) != relation_rng_restriction('#skF_12','#skF_14') )
| ( relation_rng_restriction('#skF_13',relation_rng_restriction('#skF_12','#skF_14')) != relation_rng_restriction('#skF_12','#skF_14') ) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_183]) ).
tff(c_110,plain,
relation_rng_restriction('#skF_13',relation_rng_restriction('#skF_12','#skF_14')) != relation_rng_restriction('#skF_12','#skF_14'),
inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_96]) ).
tff(c_449,plain,
( ~ subset('#skF_12','#skF_13')
| ~ relation('#skF_14') ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_428,c_110]) ).
tff(c_467,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_102,c_98,c_449]) ).
tff(c_468,plain,
relation_rng_restriction('#skF_12',relation_rng_restriction('#skF_13','#skF_14')) != relation_rng_restriction('#skF_12','#skF_14'),
inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_96]) ).
tff(c_722,plain,
( ~ subset('#skF_12','#skF_13')
| ~ relation('#skF_14') ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_704,c_468]) ).
tff(c_741,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_102,c_98,c_722]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SEU047+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 12:13:35 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 4.40/2.20 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.40/2.20
% 4.40/2.20 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.40/2.23
% 4.40/2.23 Inference rules
% 4.40/2.23 ----------------------
% 4.40/2.23 #Ref : 0
% 4.40/2.23 #Sup : 140
% 4.40/2.23 #Fact : 0
% 4.40/2.23 #Define : 0
% 4.40/2.23 #Split : 10
% 4.40/2.23 #Chain : 0
% 4.40/2.23 #Close : 0
% 4.40/2.23
% 4.40/2.23 Ordering : KBO
% 4.40/2.23
% 4.40/2.23 Simplification rules
% 4.40/2.23 ----------------------
% 4.40/2.23 #Subsume : 13
% 4.40/2.23 #Demod : 71
% 4.40/2.23 #Tautology : 75
% 4.40/2.23 #SimpNegUnit : 4
% 4.40/2.23 #BackRed : 24
% 4.40/2.23
% 4.40/2.23 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.40/2.23 #Strategies tried : 1
% 4.40/2.23
% 4.40/2.23 Timing (in seconds)
% 4.40/2.23 ----------------------
% 4.40/2.23 Preprocessing : 0.59
% 4.40/2.23 Parsing : 0.31
% 4.40/2.23 CNF conversion : 0.05
% 4.40/2.23 Main loop : 0.54
% 4.40/2.23 Inferencing : 0.21
% 4.40/2.23 Reduction : 0.15
% 4.40/2.23 Demodulation : 0.11
% 4.40/2.23 BG Simplification : 0.03
% 4.40/2.23 Subsumption : 0.10
% 4.40/2.23 Abstraction : 0.02
% 4.40/2.23 MUC search : 0.00
% 4.40/2.23 Cooper : 0.00
% 4.40/2.23 Total : 1.18
% 4.40/2.23 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 4.40/2.23 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 4.40/2.23 Index Matching : 0.00
% 4.40/2.23 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------