TSTP Solution File: SEU046+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:33:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 11.86s 12.03s
% Output   : Refutation 11.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (   6 unt;   2 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   43 (   0 equ;  28 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    function(skc11),
    file('SEU046+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    relation(skc11),
    file('SEU046+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(33,axiom,
    ~ in(skf6(u,v),u),
    file('SEU046+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(40,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | relation(relation_rng_restriction(v,u)) ),
    file('SEU046+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(44,axiom,
    ( subset(u,v)
    | in(skf6(v,u),u) ),
    file('SEU046+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(52,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | function(relation_rng_restriction(v,u)) ),
    file('SEU046+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(53,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(v,u)),relation_rng(u)) ),
    file('SEU046+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(58,axiom,
    ( ~ subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(skc12,skc11)),relation_dom(skc11))
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(skc13,skc11)),relation_rng(skc11)) ),
    file('SEU046+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(59,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ relation(v)
    | ~ function(v)
    | ~ in(w,relation_dom(u))
    | ~ equal(u,relation_rng_restriction(x,v))
    | in(w,relation_dom(v)) ),
    file('SEU046+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(81,plain,
    subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(u,skc11)),relation_rng(skc11)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,53]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,53.0')] ).

cnf(117,plain,
    ~ subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(skc12,skc11)),relation_dom(skc11)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[58,81]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:58.1,81.0')] ).

cnf(330,plain,
    ( ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(u,v))
    | ~ function(relation_rng_restriction(u,v))
    | ~ relation(v)
    | ~ function(v)
    | ~ in(w,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(u,v)))
    | in(w,relation_dom(v)) ),
    inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[59]),
    [iquote('0:EqR:59.5')] ).

cnf(331,plain,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ in(v,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(w,u)))
    | in(v,relation_dom(u)) ),
    inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[330,40,52]),
    [iquote('0:SSi:330.1,330.0,40.2,52.1,40.2,52.1')] ).

cnf(910,plain,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(v,u)),w)
    | in(skf6(w,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(v,u))),relation_dom(u)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[44,331]),
    [iquote('0:Res:44.1,331.2')] ).

cnf(6018,plain,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(v,u)),relation_dom(u)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[910,33]),
    [iquote('0:Res:910.3,33.0')] ).

cnf(15383,plain,
    ( ~ relation(skc11)
    | ~ function(skc11) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[6018,117]),
    [iquote('0:Res:6018.2,117.0')] ).

cnf(15407,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[15383,1,2]),
    [iquote('0:SSi:15383.1,15383.0,1.0,2.0,1.0,2.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SEU046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 12:27:31 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 11.86/12.03  
% 11.86/12.03  SPASS V 3.9 
% 11.86/12.03  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 11.86/12.03  % SZS status Theorem
% 11.86/12.03  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 11.86/12.03  SPASS derived 12408 clauses, backtracked 233 clauses, performed 9 splits and kept 5507 clauses.
% 11.86/12.03  SPASS allocated 113178 KBytes.
% 11.86/12.03  SPASS spent	0:0:11.34 on the problem.
% 11.86/12.03  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 11.86/12.03  		0:00:00.06 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 11.86/12.03  		0:00:00.18 for inferences.
% 11.86/12.03  		0:00:00.25 for the backtracking.
% 11.86/12.03  		0:0:10.72 for the reduction.
% 11.86/12.03  
% 11.86/12.03  
% 11.86/12.03  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 17 :
% 11.86/12.03  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 11.86/12.03  Formulae used in the proof : t89_funct_1 d3_tarski antisymmetry_r2_hidden dt_k8_relat_1 fc5_funct_1 t118_relat_1 t85_funct_1
% 11.86/12.03  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------