TSTP Solution File: SEU046+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:16:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.26s 1.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  167 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   79 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  233 (  93   ~; 104   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   24 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (   9 sgn  35   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t85_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( ( relation(X3)
            & function(X3) )
         => ( X2 = relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3)
          <=> ( ! [X4] :
                  ( in(X4,relation_dom(X2))
                <=> ( in(X4,relation_dom(X3))
                    & in(apply(X3,X4),X1) ) )
              & ! [X4] :
                  ( in(X4,relation_dom(X2))
                 => apply(X2,X4) = apply(X3,X4) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t85_funct_1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d3_tarski) ).

fof(t89_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2) )
     => ( subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_dom(X2))
        & subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_rng(X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t89_funct_1) ).

fof(fc5_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2) )
     => ( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
        & function(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fc5_funct_1) ).

fof(dt_k8_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k8_relat_1) ).

fof(t118_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_rng(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t118_relat_1) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X8,X9] :
      ( ( in(X8,relation_dom(X7))
        | ~ in(X8,relation_dom(X6))
        | X6 != relation_rng_restriction(X5,X7)
        | ~ relation(X7)
        | ~ function(X7)
        | ~ relation(X6)
        | ~ function(X6) )
      & ( in(apply(X7,X8),X5)
        | ~ in(X8,relation_dom(X6))
        | X6 != relation_rng_restriction(X5,X7)
        | ~ relation(X7)
        | ~ function(X7)
        | ~ relation(X6)
        | ~ function(X6) )
      & ( ~ in(X8,relation_dom(X7))
        | ~ in(apply(X7,X8),X5)
        | in(X8,relation_dom(X6))
        | X6 != relation_rng_restriction(X5,X7)
        | ~ relation(X7)
        | ~ function(X7)
        | ~ relation(X6)
        | ~ function(X6) )
      & ( ~ in(X9,relation_dom(X6))
        | apply(X6,X9) = apply(X7,X9)
        | X6 != relation_rng_restriction(X5,X7)
        | ~ relation(X7)
        | ~ function(X7)
        | ~ relation(X6)
        | ~ function(X6) )
      & ( in(esk14_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X6))
        | ~ in(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X6))
        | ~ in(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X7))
        | ~ in(apply(X7,esk13_3(X5,X6,X7)),X5)
        | X6 = relation_rng_restriction(X5,X7)
        | ~ relation(X7)
        | ~ function(X7)
        | ~ relation(X6)
        | ~ function(X6) )
      & ( apply(X6,esk14_3(X5,X6,X7)) != apply(X7,esk14_3(X5,X6,X7))
        | ~ in(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X6))
        | ~ in(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X7))
        | ~ in(apply(X7,esk13_3(X5,X6,X7)),X5)
        | X6 = relation_rng_restriction(X5,X7)
        | ~ relation(X7)
        | ~ function(X7)
        | ~ relation(X6)
        | ~ function(X6) )
      & ( in(esk14_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X6))
        | in(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X7))
        | in(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X6))
        | X6 = relation_rng_restriction(X5,X7)
        | ~ relation(X7)
        | ~ function(X7)
        | ~ relation(X6)
        | ~ function(X6) )
      & ( apply(X6,esk14_3(X5,X6,X7)) != apply(X7,esk14_3(X5,X6,X7))
        | in(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X7))
        | in(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X6))
        | X6 = relation_rng_restriction(X5,X7)
        | ~ relation(X7)
        | ~ function(X7)
        | ~ relation(X6)
        | ~ function(X6) )
      & ( in(esk14_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X6))
        | in(apply(X7,esk13_3(X5,X6,X7)),X5)
        | in(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X6))
        | X6 = relation_rng_restriction(X5,X7)
        | ~ relation(X7)
        | ~ function(X7)
        | ~ relation(X6)
        | ~ function(X6) )
      & ( apply(X6,esk14_3(X5,X6,X7)) != apply(X7,esk14_3(X5,X6,X7))
        | in(apply(X7,esk13_3(X5,X6,X7)),X5)
        | in(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X6))
        | X6 = relation_rng_restriction(X5,X7)
        | ~ relation(X7)
        | ~ function(X7)
        | ~ relation(X6)
        | ~ function(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t85_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
        | ~ in(X6,X4)
        | in(X6,X5) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | subset(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | subset(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( relation(X2)
          & function(X2) )
       => ( subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_dom(X2))
          & subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_rng(X2)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t89_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( in(X4,relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | X1 != relation_rng_restriction(X3,X2)
    | ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4))
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4) )
      & ( function(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4))
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc5_funct_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ relation(X4)
      | relation(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k8_relat_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk16_0)
    & function(esk16_0)
    & ( ~ subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(esk15_0,esk16_0)),relation_dom(esk16_0))
      | ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk15_0,esk16_0)),relation_rng(esk16_0)) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ relation(X4)
      | subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4)),relation_rng(X4)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t118_relat_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( subset(relation_dom(X1),X2)
    | in(esk1_2(relation_dom(X1),X2),relation_dom(X3))
    | X1 != relation_rng_restriction(X4,X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( function(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk15_0,esk16_0)),relation_rng(esk16_0))
    | ~ subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(esk15_0,esk16_0)),relation_dom(esk16_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_rng(X2))
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk16_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),X3)
    | in(esk1_2(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),X3),relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(esk15_0,esk16_0)),relation_dom(esk16_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk16_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_20]),c_0_25])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : SEU046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 12:08:29 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.26/1.45  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.018 s
% 0.26/1.45  
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof found!
% 0.26/1.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/1.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object total steps             : 27
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object clause steps            : 14
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object formula steps           : 13
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object conjectures             : 8
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 0.26/1.45  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 7
% 0.26/1.45  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/1.45  # Parsed axioms                        : 38
% 0.26/1.45  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.26/1.45  # Initial clauses                      : 70
% 0.26/1.45  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.26/1.45  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 68
% 0.26/1.45  # Processed clauses                    : 366
% 0.26/1.45  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.26/1.45  # ...subsumed                          : 138
% 0.26/1.45  # ...remaining for further processing  : 225
% 0.26/1.45  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 33
% 0.26/1.45  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.26/1.45  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.26/1.45  # Backward-rewritten                   : 24
% 0.26/1.45  # Generated clauses                    : 957
% 0.26/1.45  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 845
% 0.26/1.45  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 135
% 0.26/1.45  # Paramodulations                      : 881
% 0.26/1.45  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.26/1.45  # Equation resolutions                 : 53
% 0.26/1.45  # Current number of processed clauses  : 190
% 0.26/1.45  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 39
% 0.26/1.45  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.45  #    Negative unit clauses             : 21
% 0.26/1.45  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 130
% 0.26/1.45  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 500
% 0.26/1.45  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2966
% 0.26/1.45  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.26/1.45  # Current number of archived clauses   : 27
% 0.26/1.45  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19083
% 0.26/1.45  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5315
% 0.26/1.45  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 217
% 0.26/1.45  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2048
% 0.26/1.45  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.26/1.45  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 62
% 0.26/1.45  # BW rewrite match successes           : 13
% 0.26/1.45  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.26/1.45  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.26/1.45  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 18877
% 0.26/1.45  
% 0.26/1.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.45  # User time                : 0.050 s
% 0.26/1.45  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.26/1.45  # Total time               : 0.055 s
% 0.26/1.45  # Maximum resident set size: 4052 pages
% 0.26/23.44  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.26/23.45  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.26/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.52  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------