TSTP Solution File: SEU045+1 by lazyCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem : SEU045+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 11:52:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 56.71s 7.87s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SEU045+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 20:36:03 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 56.71/7.87 % SZS status Theorem
% 56.71/7.87 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c0, axiom,
% 56.71/7.87 relation(sK18)).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c1, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 relation(sK18),
% 56.71/7.87 inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 56.71/7.87
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c2, axiom,
% 56.71/7.87 relation(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)) | ~relation(X1)).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a0, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 sK18 = X1).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c3, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 $false,
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c4, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 relation(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 56.71/7.87
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c5, axiom,
% 56.71/7.87 sP4(X2,X3,X4) | ~function(X3) | ~relation(X3) | ~function(X4) | ~relation(X4)).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a1, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1) = X4).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c6, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 $false,
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c4, c5])).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c7, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 sP4(X2,X3,X4) | ~function(X3) | ~relation(X3) | ~function(X4),
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c4, c5])).
% 56.71/7.87
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c8, axiom,
% 56.71/7.87 sP3(relation_rng_restriction(X5,X6),X6,X5) | ~sP4(X5,X6,relation_rng_restriction(X5,X6))).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a2, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 X2 = X5).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a3, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 X3 = X6).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a4, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 X4 = relation_rng_restriction(X5,X6)).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c9, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 ~function(X3) | ~relation(X3) | ~function(X4),
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3, a4])], [c7, c8])).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c10, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 sP3(relation_rng_restriction(X5,X6),X6,X5),
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3, a4])], [c7, c8])).
% 56.71/7.87
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c11, axiom,
% 56.71/7.87 apply(X7,X8) = apply(X9,X8) | ~in(X8,relation_dom(X9)) | ~sP3(X9,X7,X10)).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a5, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 relation_rng_restriction(X5,X6) = X9).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a6, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 X6 = X7).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a7, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 X5 = X10).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c12, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 $false,
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a5, a6, a7])], [c10, c11])).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c13, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 apply(X7,X8) = apply(X9,X8) | ~in(X8,relation_dom(X9)),
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a5, a6, a7])], [c10, c11])).
% 56.71/7.87
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c14, axiom,
% 56.71/7.87 apply(relation_rng_restriction(sK16,sK18),sK17) != apply(sK18,sK17)).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a8, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 apply(relation_rng_restriction(sK16,sK18),sK17) = apply(X9,X8)).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a9, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 apply(X7,X8) = X11).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c15, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 ~in(X8,relation_dom(X9)),
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a8, a9])], [c13, c14])).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c16, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 $false,
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a8, a9])], [c13, c14])).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c17, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 X11 != apply(sK18,sK17),
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a8, a9])], [c13, c14])).
% 56.71/7.87
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a10, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 X11 = apply(sK18,sK17)).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c18, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 $false,
% 56.71/7.87 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a10])], [c17])).
% 56.71/7.87
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c19, axiom,
% 56.71/7.87 in(sK17,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(sK16,sK18)))).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a11, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 X8 = sK17).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a12, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 relation_dom(X9) = relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(sK16,sK18))).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c20, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 $false,
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a11, a12])], [c15, c19])).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c21, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 $false,
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a11, a12])], [c15, c19])).
% 56.71/7.87
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c22, axiom,
% 56.71/7.87 function(sK18)).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a13, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 X3 = sK18).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c23, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 ~relation(X3) | ~function(X4),
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a13])], [c9, c22])).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c24, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 $false,
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a13])], [c9, c22])).
% 56.71/7.87
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c25, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 relation(sK18)).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a14, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 X3 = sK18).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c26, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 ~function(X4),
% 56.71/7.87 inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a14])], [c23, c25])).
% 56.71/7.87
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c27, axiom,
% 56.71/7.87 function(relation_rng_restriction(X12,X13)) | ~function(X13) | ~relation(X13)).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a15, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 X4 = relation_rng_restriction(X12,X13)).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c28, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 $false,
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a15])], [c26, c27])).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c29, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 ~function(X13) | ~relation(X13),
% 56.71/7.87 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a15])], [c26, c27])).
% 56.71/7.87
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c30, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 function(X3)).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a16, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 X13 = X3).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c31, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 ~relation(X13),
% 56.71/7.87 inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a16])], [c29, c30])).
% 56.71/7.87
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c32, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 relation(sK18)).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(a17, assumption,
% 56.71/7.87 X13 = sK18).
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c33, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 $false,
% 56.71/7.87 inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a17])], [c31, c32])).
% 56.71/7.87
% 56.71/7.87 cnf(c34, plain,
% 56.71/7.87 $false,
% 56.71/7.87 inference(constraint_solving, [
% 56.71/7.87 bind(X0, sK16),
% 56.71/7.87 bind(X1, sK18),
% 56.71/7.87 bind(X2, sK16),
% 56.71/7.87 bind(X3, sK18),
% 56.71/7.87 bind(X4, relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),
% 56.71/7.87 bind(X5, sK16),
% 56.71/7.87 bind(X6, sK18),
% 56.71/7.87 bind(X7, sK18),
% 56.71/7.87 bind(X8, sK17),
% 56.71/7.87 bind(X9, relation_rng_restriction(X5,X6)),
% 56.71/7.87 bind(X10, sK16),
% 56.71/7.87 bind(X11, apply(X7,X8)),
% 56.71/7.87 bind(X12, sK16),
% 56.71/7.87 bind(X13, sK18)
% 56.71/7.87 ],
% 56.71/7.87 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12, a13, a14, a15, a16, a17])).
% 56.71/7.87
% 56.71/7.87 % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------