TSTP Solution File: SEU044+1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SEU044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:18:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.36s 0.62s
% Output : Refutation 0.36s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 8 unt; 2 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 44 ( 3 equ; 28 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(19,axiom,
( ~ relation(X)
| relation(relation_rng_restriction(Y,X)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k8_relat_1) ).
cnf(20,axiom,
( ~ relation(X)
| ~ function(X)
| function(relation_rng_restriction(Y,X)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc5_funct_1) ).
cnf(41,negated_conjecture,
relation('SKOLEMAAAV14'),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t86_funct_1) ).
cnf(42,negated_conjecture,
function('SKOLEMAAAV14'),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t86_funct_1) ).
cnf(43,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in('SKOLEMAAAV13',relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV14')))
| ~ in('SKOLEMAAAV13',relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV14'))
| ~ in(apply('SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV13'),'SKOLEMAAAV12') ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t86_funct_1) ).
cnf(44,negated_conjecture,
( in('SKOLEMAAAV13',relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV14')))
| in('SKOLEMAAAV13',relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV14')) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t86_funct_1) ).
cnf(45,negated_conjecture,
( in('SKOLEMAAAV13',relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV14')))
| in(apply('SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV13'),'SKOLEMAAAV12') ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t86_funct_1) ).
cnf(46,axiom,
( ~ relation(X)
| ~ function(X)
| ~ relation(Y)
| ~ function(Y)
| X != relation_rng_restriction(Z,Y)
| ~ in(U,relation_dom(X))
| in(U,relation_dom(Y)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t85_funct_1) ).
cnf(47,axiom,
( ~ relation(X)
| ~ function(X)
| ~ relation(Y)
| ~ function(Y)
| X != relation_rng_restriction(Z,Y)
| ~ in(U,relation_dom(X))
| in(apply(Y,U),Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t85_funct_1) ).
cnf(48,axiom,
( ~ relation(X)
| ~ function(X)
| ~ relation(Y)
| ~ function(Y)
| X != relation_rng_restriction(Z,Y)
| in(U,relation_dom(X))
| ~ in(U,relation_dom(Y))
| ~ in(apply(Y,U),Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t85_funct_1) ).
cnf(73,plain,
relation(relation_rng_restriction(X,'SKOLEMAAAV14')),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[19,41]) ).
cnf(93,plain,
function(relation_rng_restriction(X,'SKOLEMAAAV14')),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[20,41,42]) ).
cnf(166,plain,
in('SKOLEMAAAV13',relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV14')),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[46,93,73,41,42,44,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(167,plain,
( ~ in('SKOLEMAAAV13',relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV14')))
| ~ in(apply('SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV13'),'SKOLEMAAAV12') ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[43,166]) ).
cnf(168,plain,
in(apply('SKOLEMAAAV14','SKOLEMAAAV13'),'SKOLEMAAAV12'),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[47,93,73,41,42,45,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(169,plain,
~ in('SKOLEMAAAV13',relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV14'))),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[167,168]) ).
cnf(267,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[48,166,73,93,41,42,169,theory(equality)]),168]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SEU044+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 20:32:01 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.46 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.46 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.46 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 "."
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T20:32:02
% 0.18/0.46 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n022.cluster.edu at 2022-06-18T20:32:02
% 0.18/0.48 WARNING:
% 0.18/0.48 |relation_empty_yielding| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.48 WARNING:
% 0.18/0.48 |one_to_one| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.36/0.62
% 0.36/0.62
% 0.36/0.62 #||
% 0.36/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/0.62 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/0.62 ||#
% 0.36/0.62
% 0.36/0.62 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.36/0.62 ; 471 formulas have been input or derived (from 92 formulas).
% 0.36/0.62 ; 267 (57%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.36/0.62 ; 44 (16%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.36/0.62 ; 223 (84%) are still being kept.
% 0.36/0.62 ;
% 0.36/0.62 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.006 4% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.002 1% Assert (34 calls)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.022 14% Process new row (412 calls)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.062 40% Resolution (182 calls)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (91 calls)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (3 calls)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.003 2% Condensing (173 calls)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.012 8% Forward subsumption (173 calls)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.007 5% Backward subsumption (148 calls)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (172 calls)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.010 6% Forward simplification (392 calls)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.004 3% Backward simplification (267 calls)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.002 1% Ordering (488 calls)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.001 1% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.023 15% Other
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.154 Total
% 0.36/0.62 ; 0.156 Real time
% 0.36/0.62 ;
% 0.36/0.62 ; Term-hash-array has 611 terms in all.
% 0.36/0.62 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 122 entries (122 at peak, 148 added, 26 deleted).
% 0.36/0.62 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 636 nodes (636 at peak, 853 added, 217 deleted).
% 0.36/0.62 ; Retrieved 324 possibly forward subsuming rows in 173 calls.
% 0.36/0.62 ; Retrieved 121 possibly backward subsumed rows in 148 calls.
% 0.36/0.62 ; Path-index has 575 entries (575 at peak, 688 added, 113 deleted).
% 0.36/0.62 ; Path-index has 554 nodes (554 at peak, 599 added, 45 deleted).
% 0.36/0.62 ; Trie-index has 575 entries (575 at peak, 688 added, 113 deleted).
% 0.36/0.62 ; Trie-index has 1,577 nodes (1,577 at peak, 1,848 added, 271 deleted).
% 0.36/0.62 ; Retrieved 199 generalization terms in 1,609 calls.
% 0.36/0.62 ; Retrieved 125 instance terms in 118 calls.
% 0.36/0.62 ; Retrieved 53,431 unifiable terms in 14,783 calls.
% 0.36/0.62 ;
% 0.36/0.62 ; The agenda of rows to process has 7 entries:
% 0.36/0.62 ; 4 with value 13 3 with value 17
% 0.36/0.62 ; The agenda of rows to give has 142 entries:
% 0.36/0.62 ; 1 with value (4 7) 3 with value (4 17) 6 with value (4 34)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 3 with value (4 8) 3 with value (4 18) 9 with value (4 36)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 15 with value (4 9) 1 with value (4 19) 9 with value (4 49)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 7 with value (4 10) 3 with value (4 20) 9 with value (4 50)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 17 with value (4 11) 2 with value (4 23) 9 with value (4 51)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 5 with value (4 12) 3 with value (4 26) 9 with value (4 52)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 2 with value (4 13) 3 with value (4 28) 9 with value (4 61)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 1 with value (4 14) 3 with value (4 30) 9 with value (4 63)
% 0.36/0.62 ; 1 with value (4 15)
% 0.36/0.62 Evaluation took:
% 0.36/0.62 0.157 seconds of real time
% 0.36/0.62 0.145127 seconds of user run time
% 0.36/0.62 0.011189 seconds of system run time
% 0.36/0.62 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.36/0.62 0 page faults and
% 0.36/0.62 11,556,448 bytes consed.
% 0.36/0.62 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.36/0.62 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T20:32:02
% 0.36/0.62 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.36/0.62 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------