TSTP Solution File: SEU041+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SEU041+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 17:03:30 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 1.84s 1.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   81 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   87 (  34   ~;  25   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   0 sgn;  30   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f32,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( function(X2)
        & relation(X2) )
     => ( subset(X0,X1)
       => ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1),X0)
          & relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t82_funct_1) ).

fof(f33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( function(X2)
          & relation(X2) )
       => ( subset(X0,X1)
         => ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1),X0)
            & relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f34,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ( subset(X0,X1)
       => relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t102_relat_1) ).

fof(f35,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ( subset(X0,X1)
       => relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1),X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t103_relat_1) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1),X0)
        | relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1) )
      & subset(X0,X1)
      & function(X2)
      & relation(X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1),X0)
        | relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1) )
      & subset(X0,X1)
      & function(X2)
      & relation(X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f59]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1),X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1),X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1),X0)
          | relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) != relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1) )
        & subset(X0,X1)
        & function(X2)
        & relation(X2) )
   => ( ( relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11) != relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK12),sK11)
        | relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11) != relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11),sK12) )
      & subset(sK11,sK12)
      & function(sK13)
      & relation(sK13) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f89,plain,
    ( ( relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11) != relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK12),sK11)
      | relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11) != relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11),sK12) )
    & subset(sK11,sK12)
    & function(sK13)
    & relation(sK13) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK11,sK12,sK13])],[f60,f88]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    relation(sK13),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f89]) ).

fof(f139,plain,
    subset(sK11,sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f89]) ).

fof(f140,plain,
    ( relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11) != relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK12),sK11)
    | relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11) != relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11),sK12) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f89]) ).

fof(f141,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f62]) ).

fof(f142,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1),X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f64]) ).

cnf(c_94,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11),sK12) != relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11)
    | relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK12),sK11) != relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).

cnf(c_95,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK11,sK12),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f139]) ).

cnf(c_97,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK13),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).

cnf(c_98,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0),X1) = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f141]) ).

cnf(c_99,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1),X0) = relation_dom_restriction(X2,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f142]) ).

cnf(c_1952,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X0)
    | relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X0,sK11),sK12) = relation_dom_restriction(X0,sK11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_98]) ).

cnf(c_1975,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X0)
    | relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X0,sK12),sK11) = relation_dom_restriction(X0,sK11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_99]) ).

cnf(c_2025,plain,
    relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11),sK12) = relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_1952]) ).

cnf(c_2028,plain,
    relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK12),sK11) != relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_94,c_2025]) ).

cnf(c_2041,plain,
    relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK12),sK11) = relation_dom_restriction(sK13,sK11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_1975]) ).

cnf(c_2042,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2041,c_2028]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU041+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 00:47:49 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.84/1.15  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.84/1.15  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  ------  iProver source info
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 1.84/1.15  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 1.84/1.15  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.84/1.15  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  ------ Parsing...
% 1.84/1.15  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 12 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 3 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.84/1.15  ------ Proving...
% 1.84/1.15  ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  clauses                                 37
% 1.84/1.15  conjectures                             3
% 1.84/1.15  EPR                                     25
% 1.84/1.15  Horn                                    35
% 1.84/1.15  unary                                   20
% 1.84/1.15  binary                                  11
% 1.84/1.15  lits                                    60
% 1.84/1.15  lits eq                                 6
% 1.84/1.15  fd_pure                                 0
% 1.84/1.15  fd_pseudo                               0
% 1.84/1.15  fd_cond                                 1
% 1.84/1.15  fd_pseudo_cond                          1
% 1.84/1.15  AC symbols                              0
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  ------ 
% 1.84/1.15  Current options:
% 1.84/1.15  ------ 
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  ------ Proving...
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.84/1.15  
% 1.84/1.15  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------