TSTP Solution File: SEU041+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU041+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:38:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.42s 2.15s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 27 ( 12 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_55,plain,
( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X3) = relation_dom_restriction(X1,X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fyzkuvdq/input.p',i_0_55) ).
cnf(i_0_51,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk12_0,esk13_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fyzkuvdq/input.p',i_0_51) ).
cnf(i_0_53,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk14_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fyzkuvdq/input.p',i_0_53) ).
cnf(i_0_54,plain,
( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X3) = relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ subset(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fyzkuvdq/input.p',i_0_54) ).
cnf(i_0_50,negated_conjecture,
( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0),esk13_0) != relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0)
| relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk13_0),esk12_0) != relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fyzkuvdq/input.p',i_0_50) ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X3) = relation_dom_restriction(X1,X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
i_0_55 ).
cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk12_0,esk13_0),
i_0_51 ).
cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X1,esk13_0),esk12_0) = relation_dom_restriction(X1,esk12_0)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]) ).
cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk14_0),
i_0_53 ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X3) = relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ subset(X2,X3) ),
i_0_54 ).
cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0),esk13_0) != relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0)
| relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk13_0),esk12_0) != relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0) ),
i_0_50 ).
cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk13_0),esk12_0) = relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]) ).
cnf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X1,esk12_0),esk13_0) = relation_dom_restriction(X1,esk12_0)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_65,c_0_62]) ).
cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0),esk13_0) != relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67])]) ).
cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_64]),c_0_69]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SEU041+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 11:04:42 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.42/2.15 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 4.42/2.15 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.42/2.15 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.42/2.15 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S
% 4.42/2.15 # and selection function SelectComplexG.
% 4.42/2.15 #
% 4.42/2.15 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 4.42/2.15
% 4.42/2.15 # Proof found!
% 4.42/2.15 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.42/2.15 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.42/2.15 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.42/2.15
% 4.42/2.15 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.42/2.15 # User time : 0.014 s
% 4.42/2.15 # System time : 0.004 s
% 4.42/2.15 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 4.42/2.15 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 4.42/2.15
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------