TSTP Solution File: SEU041+1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : SEU041+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:22:13 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   28
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (   5 unt;  25 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   44 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   43 (  16   ~;  12   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   17 (  13   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;  12 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   0 sgn;  18   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    relation: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    relation_empty_yielding: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    element: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    powerset: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    function: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    one_to_one: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    relation_dom_restriction: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    esk1_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    esk5_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_38,type,
    esk6_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_39,type,
    esk7_0: $i ).

tff(decl_40,type,
    esk8_0: $i ).

tff(decl_41,type,
    esk9_0: $i ).

tff(decl_42,type,
    esk10_0: $i ).

tff(decl_43,type,
    esk11_0: $i ).

tff(decl_44,type,
    esk12_0: $i ).

tff(decl_45,type,
    esk13_0: $i ).

tff(decl_46,type,
    esk14_0: $i ).

fof(t82_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( relation(X3)
        & function(X3) )
     => ( subset(X1,X2)
       => ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1),X2) = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1)
          & relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X2),X1) = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t82_funct_1) ).

fof(t103_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation(X3)
     => ( subset(X1,X2)
       => relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X2),X1) = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t103_relat_1) ).

fof(t102_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation(X3)
     => ( subset(X1,X2)
       => relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1),X2) = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t102_relat_1) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( relation(X3)
          & function(X3) )
       => ( subset(X1,X2)
         => ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1),X2) = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1)
            & relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X2),X1) = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t82_funct_1]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X54,X55,X56] :
      ( ~ relation(X56)
      | ~ subset(X54,X55)
      | relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X56,X55),X54) = relation_dom_restriction(X56,X54) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t103_relat_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk14_0)
    & function(esk14_0)
    & subset(esk12_0,esk13_0)
    & ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0),esk13_0) != relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0)
      | relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk13_0),esk12_0) != relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X3),X2) = relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ subset(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk12_0,esk13_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X51,X52,X53] :
      ( ~ relation(X53)
      | ~ subset(X51,X52)
      | relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X53,X51),X52) = relation_dom_restriction(X53,X51) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t102_relat_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X1,esk13_0),esk12_0) = relation_dom_restriction(X1,esk12_0)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk14_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X3) = relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ subset(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0),esk13_0) != relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0)
    | relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk13_0),esk12_0) != relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk13_0),esk12_0) = relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(X1,esk12_0),esk13_0) = relation_dom_restriction(X1,esk12_0)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0),esk13_0) != relation_dom_restriction(esk14_0,esk12_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_10]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SEU041+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 00:49:12 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.55  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.57  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.57  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.57  % Proof found
% 0.19/0.57  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.57  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.57  % Total time : 0.008000 s
% 0.19/0.57  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.57  % Total time : 0.011000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------