TSTP Solution File: SEU039+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU039+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:16:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 2.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 39 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 190 ( 48 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 32 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 248 ( 97 ~; 103 |; 31 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 18 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 87 ( 11 sgn 51 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t68_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( X2 = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1)
<=> ( relation_dom(X2) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X3),X1)
& ! [X4] :
( in(X4,relation_dom(X2))
=> apply(X2,X4) = apply(X3,X4) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t68_funct_1) ).
fof(fc4_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))
& function(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fc4_funct_1) ).
fof(dt_k7_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X1)
=> relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',dt_k7_relat_1) ).
fof(t73_funct_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( ( in(X2,relation_dom(X3))
& in(X2,X1) )
=> in(apply(X3,X2),relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1))) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t73_funct_1) ).
fof(d3_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( X3 = set_intersection2(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4] :
( in(X4,X3)
<=> ( in(X4,X1)
& in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).
fof(t72_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(X2,X1)
=> apply(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1),X2) = apply(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t72_funct_1) ).
fof(d5_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] :
( in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
& X3 = apply(X1,X4) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d5_funct_1) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( relation_dom(X6) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X7),X5)
| X6 != relation_dom_restriction(X7,X5)
| ~ relation(X7)
| ~ function(X7)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6) )
& ( ~ in(X8,relation_dom(X6))
| apply(X6,X8) = apply(X7,X8)
| X6 != relation_dom_restriction(X7,X5)
| ~ relation(X7)
| ~ function(X7)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6) )
& ( in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X6))
| relation_dom(X6) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X7),X5)
| X6 = relation_dom_restriction(X7,X5)
| ~ relation(X7)
| ~ function(X7)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6) )
& ( apply(X6,esk7_3(X5,X6,X7)) != apply(X7,esk7_3(X5,X6,X7))
| relation_dom(X6) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X7),X5)
| X6 = relation_dom_restriction(X7,X5)
| ~ relation(X7)
| ~ function(X7)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t68_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X3,X4,X4] :
( ( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X3) )
& ( function(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X3) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc4_funct_1])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| relation(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k7_relat_1])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( ( in(X2,relation_dom(X3))
& in(X2,X1) )
=> in(apply(X3,X2),relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1))) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t73_funct_1]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X8,X5,X6,X7] :
( ( in(X8,X5)
| ~ in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_intersection2(X5,X6) )
& ( in(X8,X6)
| ~ in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_intersection2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X5)
| ~ in(X8,X6)
| in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_intersection2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(esk14_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| ~ in(esk14_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| ~ in(esk14_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| X7 = set_intersection2(X5,X6) )
& ( in(esk14_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| in(esk14_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = set_intersection2(X5,X6) )
& ( in(esk14_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| in(esk14_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = set_intersection2(X5,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_xboole_0])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( relation_dom(X1) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X3)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| X1 != relation_dom_restriction(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( function(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk3_0)
& function(esk3_0)
& in(esk2_0,relation_dom(esk3_0))
& in(esk2_0,esk1_0)
& ~ in(apply(esk3_0,esk2_0),relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk1_0))) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( in(X4,X1)
| X1 != set_intersection2(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6)
| ~ in(X5,X4)
| apply(relation_dom_restriction(X6,X4),X5) = apply(X6,X5) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t72_funct_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X6,X11] :
( ( in(esk4_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X5))
| ~ in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( X7 = apply(X5,esk4_3(X5,X6,X7))
| ~ in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( ~ in(X9,relation_dom(X5))
| X7 != apply(X5,X9)
| in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk5_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ in(X11,relation_dom(X5))
| esk5_2(X5,X6) != apply(X5,X11)
| X6 = relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( in(esk6_2(X5,X6),relation_dom(X5))
| in(esk5_2(X5,X6),X6)
| X6 = relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( esk5_2(X5,X6) = apply(X5,esk6_2(X5,X6))
| in(esk5_2(X5,X6),X6)
| X6 = relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X1),X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
function(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3))
| ~ in(X1,X3)
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
in(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( apply(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X1,X3)
| ~ in(X3,X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( in(X3,X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != relation_rng(X1)
| X3 != apply(X1,X4)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,X1)) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(esk3_0),X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
relation(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
function(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,X1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk2_0,set_intersection2(X1,esk1_0))
| ~ in(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
in(esk2_0,relation_dom(esk3_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( apply(relation_dom_restriction(X1,esk1_0),esk2_0) = apply(X1,esk2_0)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,X2)
| X1 != apply(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,X3),X4)
| X2 != relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,X3))
| ~ in(X4,set_intersection2(relation_dom(esk3_0),X3)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]),c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
in(esk2_0,set_intersection2(relation_dom(esk3_0),esk1_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
apply(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk1_0),esk2_0) = apply(esk3_0,esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk1_0))
| X1 != apply(esk3_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk1_0)))
| X1 != apply(esk3_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
~ in(apply(esk3_0,esk2_0),relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk1_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]),c_0_37]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SEU039+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 13:16:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/2.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/2.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.24/2.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.24/2.42
% 0.24/2.42 # Proof found!
% 0.24/2.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/2.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/2.42 # Proof object total steps : 39
% 0.24/2.42 # Proof object clause steps : 24
% 0.24/2.42 # Proof object formula steps : 15
% 0.24/2.42 # Proof object conjectures : 19
% 0.24/2.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 16
% 0.24/2.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/2.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 0.24/2.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 0.24/2.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 13
% 0.24/2.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 13
% 0.24/2.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/2.42 # Parsed axioms : 44
% 0.24/2.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 19
% 0.24/2.42 # Initial clauses : 50
% 0.24/2.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/2.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 50
% 0.24/2.42 # Processed clauses : 2329
% 0.24/2.42 # ...of these trivial : 351
% 0.24/2.42 # ...subsumed : 181
% 0.24/2.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 1797
% 0.24/2.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.24/2.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 75170
% 0.24/2.42 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.24/2.42 # Backward-rewritten : 97
% 0.24/2.42 # Generated clauses : 197179
% 0.24/2.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 195901
% 0.24/2.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 26
% 0.24/2.42 # Paramodulations : 197069
% 0.24/2.42 # Factorizations : 24
% 0.24/2.42 # Equation resolutions : 86
% 0.24/2.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 1697
% 0.24/2.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 524
% 0.24/2.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.24/2.42 # Negative unit clauses : 122
% 0.24/2.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 1050
% 0.24/2.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 116237
% 0.24/2.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 131784
% 0.24/2.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/2.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 100
% 0.24/2.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 92366
% 0.24/2.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 74384
% 0.24/2.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 186
% 0.24/2.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29238
% 0.24/2.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/2.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 27259
% 0.24/2.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 26
% 0.24/2.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/2.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/2.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5004905
% 0.24/2.42
% 0.24/2.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/2.42 # User time : 1.348 s
% 0.24/2.42 # System time : 0.070 s
% 0.24/2.42 # Total time : 1.418 s
% 0.24/2.42 # Maximum resident set size: 129772 pages
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.46 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------