TSTP Solution File: SEU032+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU032+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:33:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  28 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   80 (   0 equ;  53 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    relation(skc9),
    file('SEU032+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    function(skc9),
    file('SEU032+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    one_to_one(skc9),
    file('SEU032+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(37,axiom,
    ~ equal(function_inverse(function_inverse(skc9)),skc9),
    file('SEU032+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(49,axiom,
    ( ~ function(u)
    | ~ relation(u)
    | relation(function_inverse(u)) ),
    file('SEU032+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(50,axiom,
    ( ~ function(u)
    | ~ relation(u)
    | function(function_inverse(u)) ),
    file('SEU032+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(63,axiom,
    ( ~ one_to_one(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ relation(u)
    | one_to_one(function_inverse(u)) ),
    file('SEU032+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(64,axiom,
    ( ~ one_to_one(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ relation(u)
    | equal(relation_dom(function_inverse(u)),relation_rng(u)) ),
    file('SEU032+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(65,axiom,
    ( ~ one_to_one(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ relation(u)
    | equal(relation_rng(function_inverse(u)),relation_dom(u)) ),
    file('SEU032+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(69,axiom,
    ( ~ one_to_one(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ relation(u)
    | equal(relation_composition(function_inverse(u),u),identity_relation(relation_rng(u))) ),
    file('SEU032+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(70,axiom,
    ( ~ one_to_one(u)
    | ~ function(v)
    | ~ relation(v)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ relation(u)
    | ~ equal(relation_rng(u),relation_dom(v))
    | ~ equal(relation_composition(u,v),identity_relation(relation_dom(u)))
    | equal(v,function_inverse(u)) ),
    file('SEU032+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(74,plain,
    ( ~ relation(skc9)
    | ~ function(skc9)
    | equal(relation_composition(function_inverse(skc9),skc9),identity_relation(relation_rng(skc9))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,69]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.0,69.2')] ).

cnf(75,plain,
    ( ~ relation(skc9)
    | ~ function(skc9)
    | equal(relation_dom(function_inverse(skc9)),relation_rng(skc9)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,64]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.0,64.2')] ).

cnf(76,plain,
    ( ~ relation(skc9)
    | ~ function(skc9)
    | equal(relation_rng(function_inverse(skc9)),relation_dom(skc9)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,65]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.0,65.2')] ).

cnf(77,plain,
    ( ~ relation(skc9)
    | ~ function(skc9)
    | one_to_one(function_inverse(skc9)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,63]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.0,63.2')] ).

cnf(85,plain,
    ( ~ relation(skc9)
    | relation(function_inverse(skc9)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,49]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,49.1')] ).

cnf(86,plain,
    ( ~ relation(skc9)
    | function(function_inverse(skc9)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,50]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,50.1')] ).

cnf(111,plain,
    relation(function_inverse(skc9)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[85,1]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:85.0,1.0')] ).

cnf(112,plain,
    function(function_inverse(skc9)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[86,1]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:86.0,1.0')] ).

cnf(113,plain,
    one_to_one(function_inverse(skc9)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[77,1,2]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:77.0,77.1,1.0,2.0')] ).

cnf(114,plain,
    equal(relation_dom(function_inverse(skc9)),relation_rng(skc9)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[75,1,2]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:75.0,75.1,1.0,2.0')] ).

cnf(115,plain,
    equal(relation_rng(function_inverse(skc9)),relation_dom(skc9)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[76,1,2]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:76.0,76.1,1.0,2.0')] ).

cnf(119,plain,
    equal(relation_composition(function_inverse(skc9),skc9),identity_relation(relation_rng(skc9))),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[74,1,2]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:74.0,74.1,1.0,2.0')] ).

cnf(498,plain,
    ( ~ one_to_one(function_inverse(skc9))
    | ~ function(skc9)
    | ~ relation(skc9)
    | ~ function(function_inverse(skc9))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse(skc9))
    | ~ equal(relation_rng(function_inverse(skc9)),relation_dom(skc9))
    | ~ equal(identity_relation(relation_dom(function_inverse(skc9))),identity_relation(relation_rng(skc9)))
    | equal(function_inverse(function_inverse(skc9)),skc9) ),
    inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[119,70]),
    [iquote('0:SpL:119.0,70.6')] ).

cnf(515,plain,
    ( ~ one_to_one(function_inverse(skc9))
    | ~ function(skc9)
    | ~ relation(skc9)
    | ~ function(function_inverse(skc9))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse(skc9))
    | ~ equal(relation_dom(skc9),relation_dom(skc9))
    | ~ equal(identity_relation(relation_rng(skc9)),identity_relation(relation_rng(skc9)))
    | equal(function_inverse(function_inverse(skc9)),skc9) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[114,498,115]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:114.0,498.6,115.0,498.5')] ).

cnf(516,plain,
    ( ~ one_to_one(function_inverse(skc9))
    | ~ function(skc9)
    | ~ relation(skc9)
    | ~ function(function_inverse(skc9))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse(skc9))
    | equal(function_inverse(function_inverse(skc9)),skc9) ),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[515]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:515.6')] ).

cnf(517,plain,
    equal(function_inverse(function_inverse(skc9)),skc9),
    inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[516,113,112,111,3,2,1]),
    [iquote('0:SSi:516.4,516.3,516.2,516.1,516.0,113.0,112.0,111.0,113.0,112.0,111.0,3.0,2.0,1.0,3.0,2.0,1.0,113.0,112.0,111.0')] ).

cnf(518,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[517,37]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:517.0,37.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU032+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 18:52:43 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.48  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS derived 342 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 188 clauses.
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS allocated 98002 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS spent	0:00:00.12 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 28 :
% 0.20/0.48  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.48  Formulae used in the proof : t65_funct_1 dt_k2_funct_1 t62_funct_1 t55_funct_1 t61_funct_1 t63_funct_1
% 0.20/0.48  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------