TSTP Solution File: SEU032+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SEU032+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:18:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.38s 1.54s
% Output   : Refutation 1.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   41 (  10 equ;  24 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | relation(function_inverse(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | function(function_inverse(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1) ).

cnf(50,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ one_to_one(X)
    | relation_rng(X) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_funct_1) ).

cnf(51,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ one_to_one(X)
    | relation_dom(X) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_funct_1) ).

cnf(54,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ one_to_one(X)
    | relation_composition(function_inverse(X),X) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t61_funct_1) ).

cnf(55,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ one_to_one(X)
    | one_to_one(function_inverse(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t62_funct_1) ).

cnf(56,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | ~ function(Y)
    | ~ one_to_one(X)
    | relation_rng(X) != relation_dom(Y)
    | relation_composition(X,Y) != identity_relation(relation_dom(X))
    | Y = function_inverse(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t63_funct_1) ).

cnf(57,negated_conjecture,
    relation('SKOLEMAAAV12'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t65_funct_1) ).

cnf(58,negated_conjecture,
    function('SKOLEMAAAV12'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t65_funct_1) ).

cnf(59,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one('SKOLEMAAAV12'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t65_funct_1) ).

cnf(60,negated_conjecture,
    function_inverse(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV12')) != 'SKOLEMAAAV12',
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t65_funct_1) ).

cnf(90,plain,
    relation(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV12')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,57,58]) ).

cnf(94,plain,
    function(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV12')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[6,57,58]) ).

cnf(169,plain,
    one_to_one(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV12')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[55,57,58,59]) ).

cnf(187,plain,
    relation_rng('SKOLEMAAAV12') = relation_dom(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV12')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[50,57,58,59]) ).

cnf(189,plain,
    relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV12') = relation_rng(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV12')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[51,57,58,59]) ).

cnf(193,plain,
    relation_composition(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV12'),'SKOLEMAAAV12') = identity_relation(relation_dom(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV12'))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[54,57,58,59]),187,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(4916,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[56,189,90,94,57,58,169,60]),193,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU032+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.14/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 18:52:28 EDT 2022
% 0.20/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.47  * 
% 0.21/0.47  * 
% 0.21/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  "."
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T18:52:28
% 0.21/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n007.cluster.edu at 2022-06-18T18:52:28
% 0.21/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.21/0.50     |relation_empty_yielding| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 1.38/1.54  
% 1.38/1.54  
% 1.38/1.54  #||
% 1.38/1.54  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.38/1.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.38/1.55  ||#
% 1.38/1.55  
% 1.38/1.55  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.38/1.55  ;     17729 formulas have been input or derived (from 229 formulas).
% 1.38/1.55  ;      4916 (28%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.38/1.55  ;         1305 (27%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.38/1.55  ;         3611 (73%) are still being kept.
% 1.38/1.55  ; 
% 1.38/1.55  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.008   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.002   0%   Assert                       (44 calls)
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.262  25%   Process new row              (17,494 calls)
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.581  55%   Resolution                   (456 calls)
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.003   0%   Paramodulation               (228 calls)
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.003   0%   Condensing                   (61 calls)
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.001   0%   Forward subsumption          (61 calls)
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.002   0%   Backward subsumption         (58 calls)
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (15 calls)
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.069   6%   Forward simplification       (11,496 calls)
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.070   7%   Backward simplification      (4,916 calls)
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (175 calls)
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.38/1.55  ;     0.063   6%   Other
% 1.38/1.55  ;     1.065        Total
% 1.38/1.55  ;     1.067        Real time
% 1.38/1.55  ; 
% 1.38/1.55  ; Term-hash-array has 8,769 terms in all.
% 1.38/1.55  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 56 entries (56 at peak, 58 added, 2 deleted).
% 1.38/1.55  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 282 nodes (282 at peak, 303 added, 21 deleted).
% 1.38/1.55  ;  Retrieved 11 possibly forward subsuming rows in 61 calls.
% 1.38/1.55  ;  Retrieved 4 possibly backward subsumed rows in 58 calls.
% 1.38/1.55  ; Path-index has 6,311 entries (6,311 at peak, 8,795 added, 2,484 deleted).
% 1.38/1.55  ; Path-index has 962 nodes (962 at peak, 1,081 added, 119 deleted).
% 1.38/1.55  ; Trie-index has 6,311 entries (6,311 at peak, 8,795 added, 2,484 deleted).
% 1.38/1.55  ; Trie-index has 9,267 nodes (9,267 at peak, 12,454 added, 3,187 deleted).
% 1.38/1.55  ; Retrieved 6,927 generalization terms in 26,688 calls.
% 1.38/1.55  ; Retrieved 4,871 instance terms in 4,857 calls.
% 1.38/1.55  ; Retrieved 1,513,445 unifiable terms in 62,932 calls.
% 1.38/1.55  ; 
% 1.38/1.55  ; The agenda of rows to process has 2 entries:
% 1.38/1.55  ;     1 with value 17              1 with value 51
% 1.38/1.55  ; The agenda of rows to give has 3425 entries:
% 1.38/1.55  ;    86 with value (4 10)        319 with value (4 16)           2 with value (4 25)
% 1.38/1.55  ;   470 with value (4 11)         48 with value (4 17)           2 with value (4 26)
% 1.38/1.55  ;   328 with value (4 12)          3 with value (4 18)           2 with value (4 29)
% 1.38/1.55  ;   991 with value (4 13)          1 with value (4 19)           2 with value (4 33)
% 1.38/1.55  ;   267 with value (4 14)          2 with value (4 20)           1 with value (4 34)
% 1.38/1.55  ;   899 with value (4 15)          2 with value (4 21)
% 1.38/1.55  Evaluation took:
% 1.38/1.55    1.068 seconds of real time
% 1.38/1.55    1.001903 seconds of user run time
% 1.38/1.55    0.066086 seconds of system run time
% 1.38/1.55    [Run times include 0.087 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.38/1.55    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.38/1.55    0 page faults and
% 1.38/1.55    78,021,168 bytes consed.
% 1.38/1.55  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.38/1.55  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T18:52:29
% 1.38/1.55  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.38/1.55  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------