TSTP Solution File: SEU028+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU028+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:16:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.33s 24.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 45 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 228 ( 52 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 19 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 321 ( 138 ~; 130 |; 35 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 17 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 52 ( 0 sgn 30 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t34_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ( X2 = identity_relation(X1)
<=> ( relation_dom(X2) = X1
& ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
=> apply(X2,X3) = X3 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t34_funct_1) ).
fof(t57_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ( ( one_to_one(X2)
& in(X1,relation_rng(X2)) )
=> ( X1 = apply(X2,apply(function_inverse(X2),X1))
& X1 = apply(relation_composition(function_inverse(X2),X2),X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t57_funct_1) ).
fof(t61_funct_1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
=> ( relation_composition(X1,function_inverse(X1)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X1))
& relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X1)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t61_funct_1) ).
fof(t59_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
=> ( relation_dom(relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1)) = relation_rng(X1)
& relation_rng(relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1)) = relation_rng(X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t59_funct_1) ).
fof(t56_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ( ( one_to_one(X2)
& in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) )
=> ( X1 = apply(function_inverse(X2),apply(X2,X1))
& X1 = apply(relation_composition(X2,function_inverse(X2)),X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t56_funct_1) ).
fof(t58_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
=> ( relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,function_inverse(X1))) = relation_dom(X1)
& relation_rng(relation_composition(X1,function_inverse(X1))) = relation_dom(X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t58_funct_1) ).
fof(fc1_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1)
& relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
& function(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fc1_funct_1) ).
fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& relation(X2) )
=> relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k2_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( relation(function_inverse(X1))
& function(function_inverse(X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k2_funct_1) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( relation_dom(X5) = X4
| X5 != identity_relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( ~ in(X6,X4)
| apply(X5,X6) = X6
| X5 != identity_relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( in(esk2_2(X4,X5),X4)
| relation_dom(X5) != X4
| X5 = identity_relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( apply(X5,esk2_2(X4,X5)) != esk2_2(X4,X5)
| relation_dom(X5) != X4
| X5 = identity_relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t34_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( X3 = apply(X4,apply(function_inverse(X4),X3))
| ~ one_to_one(X4)
| ~ in(X3,relation_rng(X4))
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( X3 = apply(relation_composition(function_inverse(X4),X4),X3)
| ~ one_to_one(X4)
| ~ in(X3,relation_rng(X4))
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t57_funct_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
=> ( relation_composition(X1,function_inverse(X1)) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X1))
& relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1) = identity_relation(relation_rng(X1)) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t61_funct_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( X1 = identity_relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation_dom(X1) != X2
| apply(X1,esk2_2(X2,X1)) != esk2_2(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( X2 = apply(relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1),X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1))
| ~ one_to_one(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X2] :
( ( relation_dom(relation_composition(function_inverse(X2),X2)) = relation_rng(X2)
| ~ one_to_one(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X2) )
& ( relation_rng(relation_composition(function_inverse(X2),X2)) = relation_rng(X2)
| ~ one_to_one(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X2) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t59_funct_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( X3 = apply(function_inverse(X4),apply(X4,X3))
| ~ one_to_one(X4)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X4))
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( X3 = apply(relation_composition(X4,function_inverse(X4)),X3)
| ~ one_to_one(X4)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X4))
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t56_funct_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk1_0)
& function(esk1_0)
& one_to_one(esk1_0)
& ( relation_composition(esk1_0,function_inverse(esk1_0)) != identity_relation(relation_dom(esk1_0))
| relation_composition(function_inverse(esk1_0),esk1_0) != identity_relation(relation_rng(esk1_0)) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1) = identity_relation(X2)
| relation_dom(relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1)) != X2
| ~ one_to_one(X1)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(esk2_2(X2,relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1)),relation_rng(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( X1 = identity_relation(X2)
| in(esk2_2(X2,X1),X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation_dom(X1) != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( relation_dom(relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1)) = relation_rng(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( X2 = apply(relation_composition(X1,function_inverse(X1)),X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ one_to_one(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X2] :
( ( relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,function_inverse(X2))) = relation_dom(X2)
| ~ one_to_one(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X2) )
& ( relation_rng(relation_composition(X2,function_inverse(X2))) = relation_dom(X2)
| ~ one_to_one(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X2) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t58_funct_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( relation_composition(function_inverse(esk1_0),esk1_0) != identity_relation(relation_rng(esk1_0))
| relation_composition(esk1_0,function_inverse(esk1_0)) != identity_relation(relation_dom(esk1_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( identity_relation(relation_rng(X1)) = relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X1)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(relation_composition(function_inverse(X1),X1))
| ~ function(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
one_to_one(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
function(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( relation_composition(X1,function_inverse(X1)) = identity_relation(X2)
| relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,function_inverse(X1))) != X2
| ~ one_to_one(X1)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(X1,function_inverse(X1)))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(relation_composition(X1,function_inverse(X1)))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(esk2_2(X2,relation_composition(X1,function_inverse(X1))),relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,function_inverse(X1))) = relation_dom(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( identity_relation(relation_dom(esk1_0)) != relation_composition(esk1_0,function_inverse(esk1_0))
| ~ relation(relation_composition(function_inverse(esk1_0),esk1_0))
| ~ function(relation_composition(function_inverse(esk1_0),esk1_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) = relation_composition(X1,function_inverse(X1))
| ~ one_to_one(X1)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(X1,function_inverse(X1)))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(relation_composition(X1,function_inverse(X1)))
| ~ function(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_18]),c_0_28]) ).
fof(c_0_31,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( relation(relation_composition(X3,X4))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( function(relation_composition(X3,X4))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc1_funct_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relation(relation_composition(function_inverse(esk1_0),esk1_0))
| ~ relation(relation_composition(esk1_0,function_inverse(esk1_0)))
| ~ function(relation_composition(function_inverse(esk1_0),esk1_0))
| ~ function(relation_composition(esk1_0,function_inverse(esk1_0))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( function(relation_composition(X2,X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
fof(c_0_34,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| relation(relation_composition(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relation(relation_composition(function_inverse(esk1_0),esk1_0))
| ~ relation(relation_composition(esk1_0,function_inverse(esk1_0)))
| ~ relation(function_inverse(esk1_0))
| ~ function(relation_composition(esk1_0,function_inverse(esk1_0)))
| ~ function(function_inverse(esk1_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relation(relation_composition(esk1_0,function_inverse(esk1_0)))
| ~ relation(function_inverse(esk1_0))
| ~ function(relation_composition(esk1_0,function_inverse(esk1_0)))
| ~ function(function_inverse(esk1_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relation(relation_composition(esk1_0,function_inverse(esk1_0)))
| ~ relation(function_inverse(esk1_0))
| ~ function(function_inverse(esk1_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_33]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
fof(c_0_39,plain,
! [X2] :
( ( relation(function_inverse(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X2) )
& ( function(function_inverse(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X2) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k2_funct_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relation(function_inverse(esk1_0))
| ~ function(function_inverse(esk1_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_36]),c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( function(function_inverse(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
~ relation(function_inverse(esk1_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( relation(function_inverse(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SEU028+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 09:29:15 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.33/23.39 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.33/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.33/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.33/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.33/24.51 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.33/24.51
% 0.33/24.51 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.33/24.51 # OLD status Res
% 0.33/24.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.33/24.51 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 0.33/24.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 0.33/24.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 0.33/24.51
% 0.33/24.51 # Proof found!
% 0.33/24.51 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.33/24.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.33/24.51 # Proof object total steps : 45
% 0.33/24.51 # Proof object clause steps : 26
% 0.33/24.51 # Proof object formula steps : 19
% 0.33/24.51 # Proof object conjectures : 15
% 0.33/24.51 # Proof object clause conjectures : 12
% 0.33/24.51 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.33/24.51 # Proof object initial clauses used : 14
% 0.33/24.51 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9
% 0.33/24.51 # Proof object generating inferences : 12
% 0.33/24.51 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 26
% 0.33/24.51 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.33/24.51 # Parsed axioms : 45
% 0.33/24.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7
% 0.33/24.51 # Initial clauses : 66
% 0.33/24.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.33/24.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 64
% 0.33/24.51 # Processed clauses : 2069
% 0.33/24.51 # ...of these trivial : 11
% 0.33/24.51 # ...subsumed : 1079
% 0.33/24.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 979
% 0.33/24.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.33/24.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.33/24.51 # Backward-subsumed : 76
% 0.33/24.51 # Backward-rewritten : 132
% 0.33/24.51 # Generated clauses : 13282
% 0.33/24.51 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 12301
% 0.33/24.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 986
% 0.33/24.51 # Paramodulations : 12603
% 0.33/24.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.33/24.51 # Equation resolutions : 13
% 0.33/24.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 771
% 0.33/24.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 99
% 0.33/24.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.33/24.51 # Negative unit clauses : 56
% 0.33/24.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 616
% 0.33/24.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9066
% 0.33/24.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 53742
% 0.33/24.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.33/24.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 208
% 0.33/24.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 239693
% 0.33/24.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 48600
% 0.33/24.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2002
% 0.33/24.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18618
% 0.33/24.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.33/24.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 78
% 0.33/24.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 78
% 0.33/24.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.33/24.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.33/24.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 182411
% 0.33/24.51
% 0.33/24.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/24.51 # User time : 0.262 s
% 0.33/24.51 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.33/24.51 # Total time : 0.274 s
% 0.33/24.51 # Maximum resident set size: 12572 pages
% 0.33/46.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.33/46.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.33/46.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/46.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.33/46.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/46.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/46.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/46.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/46.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.44 eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.pCannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.44
% 0.33/46.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/46.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/46.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------