TSTP Solution File: SEU027+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SEU027+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:18:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.36s 1.57s
% Output   : Refutation 1.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   24 (  16 unt;   1 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   62 (  20 equ;  39 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | Y != relation_rng(X)
    | in(Z,Y)
    | ~ in(U,relation_dom(X))
    | Z != apply(X,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_funct_1) ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | relation(function_inverse(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | function(function_inverse(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1) ).

cnf(48,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ one_to_one(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | ~ function(Y)
    | Y != function_inverse(X)
    | relation_dom(Y) = relation_rng(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t54_funct_1) ).

cnf(52,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ one_to_one(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | ~ function(Y)
    | Y != function_inverse(X)
    | ~ in(Z,relation_dom(X))
    | U != apply(X,Z)
    | Z = apply(Y,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t54_funct_1) ).

cnf(59,negated_conjecture,
    relation('SKOLEMAAAV17'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t60_funct_1) ).

cnf(60,negated_conjecture,
    function('SKOLEMAAAV17'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t60_funct_1) ).

cnf(61,negated_conjecture,
    relation('SKOLEMAAAV18'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t60_funct_1) ).

cnf(62,negated_conjecture,
    function('SKOLEMAAAV18'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t60_funct_1) ).

cnf(63,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one('SKOLEMAAAV17'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t60_funct_1) ).

cnf(64,negated_conjecture,
    relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV17') = relation_rng('SKOLEMAAAV18'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t60_funct_1) ).

cnf(65,negated_conjecture,
    relation_rng('SKOLEMAAAV17') = relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV18'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t60_funct_1) ).

cnf(67,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X,relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV17'))
    | ~ in(Y,relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV18'))
    | apply('SKOLEMAAAV17',X) = Y
    | apply('SKOLEMAAAV18',Y) != X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t60_funct_1) ).

cnf(68,negated_conjecture,
    'SKOLEMAAAV18' != function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV17'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t60_funct_1) ).

cnf(72,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | ~ function(Y)
    | relation_dom(X) != relation_dom(Y)
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV19'(X,Y),relation_dom(X))
    | X = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t9_funct_1) ).

cnf(73,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | ~ function(Y)
    | relation_dom(X) != relation_dom(Y)
    | apply(X,'SKOLEMAAAV19'(X,Y)) != apply(Y,'SKOLEMAAAV19'(X,Y))
    | X = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t9_funct_1) ).

cnf(101,plain,
    relation(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV17')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,59,60]) ).

cnf(105,plain,
    function(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV17')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,59,60]) ).

cnf(174,plain,
    relation_dom(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV17')) = relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV18'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[48,105,59,60,63,101,theory(equality)]),65,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(382,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV19'('SKOLEMAAAV18',function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV17')),relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV18')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[72,174,61,62,101,105,68]) ).

cnf(386,plain,
    apply('SKOLEMAAAV18','SKOLEMAAAV19'('SKOLEMAAAV18',function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV17'))) != apply(function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV17'),'SKOLEMAAAV19'('SKOLEMAAAV18',function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV17'))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[73,174,61,62,101,105,68]) ).

cnf(663,plain,
    in(apply('SKOLEMAAAV18','SKOLEMAAAV19'('SKOLEMAAAV18',function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV17'))),relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV17')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[7,382,61,62,theory(equality),theory(equality)]),64,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1703,plain,
    apply('SKOLEMAAAV17',apply('SKOLEMAAAV18','SKOLEMAAAV19'('SKOLEMAAAV18',function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV17')))) = 'SKOLEMAAAV19'('SKOLEMAAAV18',function_inverse('SKOLEMAAAV17')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[67,663,382,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1705,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[52,663,59,60,63,101,105,theory(equality),theory(equality)]),386,1703,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SEU027+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 13:31:15 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  "."
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-20T13:31:15
% 0.18/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n029.cluster.edu at 2022-06-20T13:31:15
% 0.18/0.48  WARNING:
% 0.18/0.48     |relation_empty_yielding| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 1.36/1.57  
% 1.36/1.57  
% 1.36/1.57  #||
% 1.36/1.57  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.36/1.57  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.36/1.58  ||#
% 1.36/1.58  
% 1.36/1.58  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.36/1.58  ;      4114 formulas have been input or derived (from 682 formulas).
% 1.36/1.58  ;      1705 (41%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.36/1.58  ;          167 (10%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.36/1.58  ;         1538 (90%) are still being kept.
% 1.36/1.58  ; 
% 1.36/1.58  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.008   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.003   0%   Assert                       (37 calls)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.099   9%   Process new row              (3,295 calls)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.880  79%   Resolution                   (1,362 calls)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.007   1%   Paramodulation               (681 calls)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (7 calls)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.006   1%   Condensing                   (367 calls)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.011   1%   Forward subsumption          (367 calls)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.005   0%   Backward subsumption         (325 calls)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.002   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (93 calls)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.035   3%   Forward simplification       (3,210 calls)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.012   1%   Backward simplification      (1,705 calls)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (1,446 calls)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     0.043   4%   Other
% 1.36/1.58  ;     1.112        Total
% 1.36/1.58  ;     1.122        Real time
% 1.36/1.58  ; 
% 1.36/1.58  ; Term-hash-array has 2,622 terms in all.
% 1.36/1.58  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 276 entries (276 at peak, 325 added, 49 deleted).
% 1.36/1.58  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,957 nodes (2,957 at peak, 3,520 added, 563 deleted).
% 1.36/1.58  ;  Retrieved 137 possibly forward subsuming rows in 367 calls.
% 1.36/1.58  ;  Retrieved 11 possibly backward subsumed rows in 325 calls.
% 1.36/1.58  ; Path-index has 2,439 entries (2,439 at peak, 2,728 added, 289 deleted).
% 1.36/1.58  ; Path-index has 3,830 nodes (3,833 at peak, 4,158 added, 328 deleted).
% 1.36/1.58  ; Trie-index has 2,439 entries (2,439 at peak, 2,728 added, 289 deleted).
% 1.36/1.58  ; Trie-index has 9,211 nodes (9,212 at peak, 10,308 added, 1,097 deleted).
% 1.36/1.58  ; Retrieved 2,959 generalization terms in 8,390 calls.
% 1.36/1.58  ; Retrieved 1,475 instance terms in 1,379 calls.
% 1.36/1.58  ; Retrieved 2,174,918 unifiable terms in 144,390 calls.
% 1.36/1.58  ; 
% 1.36/1.58  ; The agenda of rows to give has 880 entries:
% 1.36/1.58  ;    99 with value (4 17)          2 with value (4 33)           1 with value (4 47)
% 1.36/1.58  ;   117 with value (4 18)         11 with value (4 34)          10 with value (4 48)
% 1.36/1.58  ;   113 with value (4 19)          5 with value (4 35)           4 with value (4 49)
% 1.36/1.58  ;    84 with value (4 20)          3 with value (4 36)           1 with value (4 51)
% 1.36/1.58  ;    84 with value (4 21)          1 with value (4 37)           1 with value (4 52)
% 1.36/1.58  ;    71 with value (4 22)          9 with value (4 38)           4 with value (4 53)
% 1.36/1.58  ;    62 with value (4 23)          9 with value (4 39)           8 with value (4 54)
% 1.36/1.58  ;    46 with value (4 24)          5 with value (4 40)           5 with value (4 57)
% 1.36/1.58  ;    15 with value (4 25)         12 with value (4 41)           1 with value (4 60)
% 1.36/1.58  ;    11 with value (4 26)          1 with value (4 42)           4 with value (4 62)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     7 with value (4 27)          2 with value (4 43)           1 with value (4 63)
% 1.36/1.58  ;    12 with value (4 28)          9 with value (4 44)           1 with value (4 66)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     8 with value (4 29)          1 with value (4 45)           1 with value (4 77)
% 1.36/1.58  ;     8 with value (4 30)         18 with value (4 46)           1 with value (4 83)
% 1.36/1.58  ;    12 with value (4 32)
% 1.36/1.58  Evaluation took:
% 1.36/1.58    1.122 seconds of real time
% 1.36/1.58    1.085161 seconds of user run time
% 1.36/1.58    0.037225 seconds of system run time
% 1.36/1.58    [Run times include 0.051 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.36/1.58    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.36/1.58    0 page faults and
% 1.36/1.58    76,677,280 bytes consed.
% 1.36/1.58  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.36/1.58  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-20T13:31:16
% 1.36/1.58  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.36/1.58  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------