TSTP Solution File: SEU025+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SEU025+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 17:03:26 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.23s 1.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   58 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  184 (  53 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  221 (  95   ~;  85   |;  27   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   1 sgn;  31   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ( function(function_inverse(X0))
        & relation(function_inverse(X0)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : subset(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(f33,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( relation(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( relation(X1)
         => ( subset(relation_rng(X0),relation_dom(X1))
           => relation_dom(X0) = relation_dom(relation_composition(X0,X1)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t46_relat_1) ).

fof(f34,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( relation(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( relation(X1)
         => ( subset(relation_dom(X0),relation_rng(X1))
           => relation_rng(X0) = relation_rng(relation_composition(X1,X0)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t47_relat_1) ).

fof(f36,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ( one_to_one(X0)
       => ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X0))
          & relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_funct_1) ).

fof(f37,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
     => ( one_to_one(X0)
       => ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)))
          & relation_dom(X0) = relation_dom(relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0))) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t58_funct_1) ).

fof(f38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ( function(X0)
          & relation(X0) )
       => ( one_to_one(X0)
         => ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)))
            & relation_dom(X0) = relation_dom(relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0))) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ! [X0] : subset(X0,X0),
    inference(rectify,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( function(function_inverse(X0))
        & relation(function_inverse(X0)) )
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( function(function_inverse(X0))
        & relation(function_inverse(X0)) )
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f51]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_dom(relation_composition(X0,X1))
          | ~ subset(relation_rng(X0),relation_dom(X1))
          | ~ relation(X1) )
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_dom(relation_composition(X0,X1))
          | ~ subset(relation_rng(X0),relation_dom(X1))
          | ~ relation(X1) )
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f71]) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( relation_rng(X0) = relation_rng(relation_composition(X1,X0))
          | ~ subset(relation_dom(X0),relation_rng(X1))
          | ~ relation(X1) )
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f74,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( relation_rng(X0) = relation_rng(relation_composition(X1,X0))
          | ~ subset(relation_dom(X0),relation_rng(X1))
          | ~ relation(X1) )
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f73]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X0))
        & relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) )
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X0))
        & relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) )
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f77]) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ( relation_dom(X0) != relation_rng(relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)))
        | relation_dom(X0) != relation_dom(relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0))) )
      & one_to_one(X0)
      & function(X0)
      & relation(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f80,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ( relation_dom(X0) != relation_rng(relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)))
        | relation_dom(X0) != relation_dom(relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0))) )
      & one_to_one(X0)
      & function(X0)
      & relation(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f79]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ( relation_dom(X0) != relation_rng(relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0)))
          | relation_dom(X0) != relation_dom(relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(X0))) )
        & one_to_one(X0)
        & function(X0)
        & relation(X0) )
   => ( ( relation_dom(sK11) != relation_rng(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11)))
        | relation_dom(sK11) != relation_dom(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))) )
      & one_to_one(sK11)
      & function(sK11)
      & relation(sK11) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f109,plain,
    ( ( relation_dom(sK11) != relation_rng(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11)))
      | relation_dom(sK11) != relation_dom(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))) )
    & one_to_one(sK11)
    & function(sK11)
    & relation(sK11) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK11])],[f80,f108]) ).

fof(f116,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( relation(function_inverse(X0))
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

fof(f157,plain,
    ! [X0] : subset(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f162,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_dom(relation_composition(X0,X1))
      | ~ subset(relation_rng(X0),relation_dom(X1))
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f72]) ).

fof(f163,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation_rng(X0) = relation_rng(relation_composition(X1,X0))
      | ~ subset(relation_dom(X0),relation_rng(X1))
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f74]) ).

fof(f165,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X0))
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f166,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( relation_dom(X0) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X0))
      | ~ one_to_one(X0)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f167,plain,
    relation(sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f109]) ).

fof(f168,plain,
    function(sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f109]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    one_to_one(sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f109]) ).

fof(f170,plain,
    ( relation_dom(sK11) != relation_rng(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11)))
    | relation_dom(sK11) != relation_dom(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f109]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    ( ~ function(X0)
    | ~ relation(X0)
    | relation(function_inverse(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).

cnf(c_94,plain,
    subset(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f157]) ).

cnf(c_99,plain,
    ( ~ subset(relation_rng(X0),relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ relation(X0)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | relation_dom(relation_composition(X0,X1)) = relation_dom(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).

cnf(c_100,plain,
    ( ~ subset(relation_dom(X0),relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ relation(X0)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | relation_rng(relation_composition(X1,X0)) = relation_rng(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f163]) ).

cnf(c_102,plain,
    ( ~ function(X0)
    | ~ relation(X0)
    | ~ one_to_one(X0)
    | relation_rng(function_inverse(X0)) = relation_dom(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f166]) ).

cnf(c_103,plain,
    ( ~ function(X0)
    | ~ relation(X0)
    | ~ one_to_one(X0)
    | relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) = relation_rng(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f165]) ).

cnf(c_104,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_dom(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))) != relation_dom(sK11)
    | relation_rng(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))) != relation_dom(sK11) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f170]) ).

cnf(c_105,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one(sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f169]) ).

cnf(c_106,negated_conjecture,
    function(sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f168]) ).

cnf(c_107,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK11),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f167]) ).

cnf(c_131,plain,
    ( ~ function(sK11)
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | relation(function_inverse(sK11)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_54]) ).

cnf(c_137,plain,
    ( ~ function(sK11)
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | ~ one_to_one(sK11)
    | relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)) = relation_rng(sK11) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_103]) ).

cnf(c_138,plain,
    ( ~ function(sK11)
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | ~ one_to_one(sK11)
    | relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)) = relation_dom(sK11) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_102]) ).

cnf(c_568,plain,
    ( X0 != sK11
    | ~ function(X0)
    | ~ relation(X0)
    | relation_dom(function_inverse(X0)) = relation_rng(X0) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_105]) ).

cnf(c_569,plain,
    ( ~ function(sK11)
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)) = relation_rng(sK11) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_568]) ).

cnf(c_570,plain,
    relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)) = relation_rng(sK11),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_569,c_107,c_106,c_105,c_137]) ).

cnf(c_4424,plain,
    subset(relation_rng(X0),relation_rng(X0)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_94]) ).

cnf(c_4426,plain,
    subset(relation_rng(sK11),relation_rng(sK11)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_4424]) ).

cnf(c_4548,plain,
    ( ~ subset(relation_rng(X0),relation_rng(sK11))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse(sK11))
    | ~ relation(X0)
    | relation_dom(relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(sK11))) = relation_dom(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_570,c_99]) ).

cnf(c_4563,plain,
    ( ~ subset(relation_rng(sK11),relation_rng(sK11))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse(sK11))
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | relation_dom(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))) = relation_dom(sK11) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_4548]) ).

cnf(c_4609,negated_conjecture,
    relation_rng(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))) != relation_dom(sK11),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_107,c_106,c_131,c_104,c_4426,c_4563]) ).

cnf(c_4982,plain,
    ( ~ subset(relation_rng(sK11),relation_rng(X0))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse(sK11))
    | ~ relation(X0)
    | relation_rng(relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(sK11))) = relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_570,c_100]) ).

cnf(c_5025,plain,
    ( ~ subset(relation_rng(sK11),relation_rng(sK11))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse(sK11))
    | ~ relation(sK11)
    | relation_rng(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))) = relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_4982]) ).

cnf(c_5567,plain,
    ( ~ subset(relation_rng(sK11),relation_rng(X0))
    | ~ relation(X0)
    | relation_rng(relation_composition(X0,function_inverse(sK11))) = relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_4982,c_107,c_106,c_131,c_4982]) ).

cnf(c_5570,plain,
    ( ~ relation(sK11)
    | relation_rng(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))) = relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_94,c_5567]) ).

cnf(c_6406,plain,
    relation_rng(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))) = relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_5570,c_107,c_106,c_131,c_4426,c_5025]) ).

cnf(c_6416,plain,
    relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)) != relation_dom(sK11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6406,c_4609]) ).

cnf(c_6417,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_6416,c_138,c_105,c_106,c_107]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : SEU025+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 17:49:05 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.23/1.19  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.23/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  ------  iProver source info
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 3.23/1.19  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 3.23/1.19  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.23/1.19  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  ------ Parsing...
% 3.23/1.19  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.23/1.19  ------ Proving...
% 3.23/1.19  ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  clauses                                 60
% 3.23/1.19  conjectures                             3
% 3.23/1.19  EPR                                     29
% 3.23/1.19  Horn                                    58
% 3.23/1.19  unary                                   27
% 3.23/1.19  binary                                  17
% 3.23/1.19  lits                                    113
% 3.23/1.19  lits eq                                 12
% 3.23/1.19  fd_pure                                 0
% 3.23/1.19  fd_pseudo                               0
% 3.23/1.19  fd_cond                                 1
% 3.23/1.19  fd_pseudo_cond                          1
% 3.23/1.19  AC symbols                              0
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  ------ 
% 3.23/1.19  Current options:
% 3.23/1.19  ------ 
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  ------ Proving...
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.23/1.19  
% 3.23/1.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------