TSTP Solution File: SEU025+1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SEU025+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:11:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.40s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
relation(sK11),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t58_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
function(sK11),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t58_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
one_to_one(sK11),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t58_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_dom(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))),relation_dom(sK11))
| ~ sPE(relation_rng(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))),relation_dom(sK11)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t58_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ function(sK11)
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ one_to_one(sK11)
| sPE(relation_rng(sK11),relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ function(sK11)
| ~ relation(sK11)
| relation(function_inverse(sK11)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ function(sK11)
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ one_to_one(sK11)
| sPE(relation_dom(sK11),relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ relation(function_inverse(sK11))
| ~ subset(relation_rng(sK11),relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)))
| sPE(relation_dom(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))),relation_dom(sK11)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t46_relat_1)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_rng(sK11),relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)))
| sPE(relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)),relation_rng(sK11)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ relation(function_inverse(sK11))
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ subset(relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)),relation_rng(sK11))
| sPE(relation_rng(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))),relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t47_relat_1)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_dom(sK11),relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)))
| sPE(relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)),relation_dom(sK11)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_rng(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))),relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)))
| ~ sPE(relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)),relation_dom(sK11))
| sPE(relation_rng(relation_composition(sK11,function_inverse(sK11))),relation_dom(sK11)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g12,plain,
sPE(relation_rng(sK11),relation_rng(sK11)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g13,plain,
subset(relation_rng(sK11),relation_rng(sK11)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski)]) ).
cnf(g14,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_rng(sK11),relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)))
| ~ sPE(relation_rng(sK11),relation_rng(sK11))
| ~ subset(relation_rng(sK11),relation_rng(sK11))
| subset(relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)),relation_rng(sK11)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g15,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)),relation_rng(sK11))
| ~ sPE(relation_rng(sK11),relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)))
| ~ subset(relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)),relation_rng(sK11))
| subset(relation_rng(sK11),relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SEU025+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 16:09:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.40 % symbols: 28
% 0.19/0.40 % clauses: 84
% 0.19/0.40 % start clauses: 4
% 0.19/0.40 % iterative deepening steps: 110
% 0.19/0.40 % maximum path limit: 3
% 0.19/0.40 % literal attempts: 65739
% 0.19/0.40 % depth failures: 56826
% 0.19/0.40 % regularity failures: 196
% 0.19/0.40 % tautology failures: 795
% 0.19/0.40 % reductions: 3421
% 0.19/0.40 % extensions: 61919
% 0.19/0.40 % SAT variables: 11389
% 0.19/0.40 % SAT clauses: 12052
% 0.19/0.40 % WalkSAT solutions: 12048
% 0.19/0.40 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------