TSTP Solution File: SEU020+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU020+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:16:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.26s 1.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   75 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   76 (  26   ~;  22   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   2 sgn  15   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t53_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1) )
     => ( ? [X2] :
            ( relation(X2)
            & function(X2)
            & relation_composition(X1,X2) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) )
       => one_to_one(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t53_funct_1) ).

fof(t52_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : one_to_one(identity_relation(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t52_funct_1) ).

fof(t47_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( relation(X2)
            & function(X2) )
         => ( ( one_to_one(relation_composition(X2,X1))
              & subset(relation_rng(X2),relation_dom(X1)) )
           => one_to_one(X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t47_funct_1) ).

fof(t71_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)) = X1
      & relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t71_relat_1) ).

fof(t27_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( relation(X2)
            & function(X2) )
         => ( relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)) = relation_dom(X2)
           => subset(relation_rng(X2),relation_dom(X1)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t27_funct_1) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( relation(X1)
          & function(X1) )
       => ( ? [X2] :
              ( relation(X2)
              & function(X2)
              & relation_composition(X1,X2) = identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) )
         => one_to_one(X1) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t53_funct_1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X2] : one_to_one(identity_relation(X2)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t52_funct_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk1_0)
    & function(esk1_0)
    & relation(esk2_0)
    & function(esk2_0)
    & relation_composition(esk1_0,esk2_0) = identity_relation(relation_dom(esk1_0))
    & ~ one_to_one(esk1_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ relation(X3)
      | ~ function(X3)
      | ~ relation(X4)
      | ~ function(X4)
      | ~ one_to_one(relation_composition(X4,X3))
      | ~ subset(relation_rng(X4),relation_dom(X3))
      | one_to_one(X4) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t47_funct_1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    one_to_one(identity_relation(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    relation_composition(esk1_0,esk2_0) = identity_relation(relation_dom(esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X2,X2] :
      ( relation_dom(identity_relation(X2)) = X2
      & relation_rng(identity_relation(X2)) = X2 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t71_relat_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( one_to_one(X1)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ one_to_one(relation_composition(X1,X2))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one(relation_composition(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ one_to_one(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ relation(X3)
      | ~ function(X3)
      | ~ relation(X4)
      | ~ function(X4)
      | relation_dom(relation_composition(X4,X3)) != relation_dom(X4)
      | subset(relation_rng(X4),relation_dom(X3)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t27_funct_1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(relation_rng(esk1_0),relation_dom(esk2_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_dom(X2))
    | relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2)) != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    relation_dom(relation_composition(esk1_0,esk2_0)) = relation_dom(esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem  : SEU020+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 10:53:03 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.26/1.43  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.43  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.26/1.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 0.26/1.43  
% 0.26/1.43  # Proof found!
% 0.26/1.43  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/1.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.43  # Proof object total steps             : 25
% 0.26/1.43  # Proof object clause steps            : 14
% 0.26/1.43  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.26/1.43  # Proof object conjectures             : 13
% 0.26/1.43  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 10
% 0.26/1.43  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.26/1.43  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 0.26/1.43  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.26/1.43  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.26/1.43  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 13
% 0.26/1.43  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/1.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 40
% 0.26/1.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5
% 0.26/1.43  # Initial clauses                      : 53
% 0.26/1.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.26/1.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 53
% 0.26/1.43  # Processed clauses                    : 75
% 0.26/1.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.26/1.43  # ...subsumed                          : 6
% 0.26/1.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 67
% 0.26/1.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.26/1.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.26/1.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.26/1.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.26/1.43  # Generated clauses                    : 63
% 0.26/1.43  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 60
% 0.26/1.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.26/1.43  # Paramodulations                      : 63
% 0.26/1.43  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.26/1.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.26/1.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 62
% 0.26/1.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 25
% 0.26/1.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.26/1.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 31
% 0.26/1.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29
% 0.26/1.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 80
% 0.26/1.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.26/1.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 0.26/1.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 211
% 0.26/1.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 93
% 0.26/1.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 8
% 0.26/1.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.26/1.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.26/1.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.26/1.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.26/1.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.26/1.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.26/1.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3288
% 0.26/1.43  
% 0.26/1.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.43  # User time                : 0.019 s
% 0.26/1.43  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.26/1.43  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.26/1.43  # Maximum resident set size: 3032 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------