TSTP Solution File: SEU019+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SEU019+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May 1 03:49:49 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.56s 0.76s
% Output : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 22
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 56 ( 18 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 216 ( 77 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 275 ( 115 ~; 107 |; 40 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 77 ( 65 !; 12 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f345,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f344,f94]) ).
fof(f94,plain,
! [X0] : relation(identity_relation(X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
! [X0] :
( function(identity_relation(X0))
& relation(identity_relation(X0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zimjbcv59a/Vampire---4.8_6468',fc2_funct_1) ).
fof(f344,plain,
~ relation(identity_relation(sK0)),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f343,f95]) ).
fof(f95,plain,
! [X0] : function(identity_relation(X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f343,plain,
( ~ function(identity_relation(sK0))
| ~ relation(identity_relation(sK0)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f342,f89]) ).
fof(f89,plain,
~ one_to_one(identity_relation(sK0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).
fof(f61,plain,
~ one_to_one(identity_relation(sK0)),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f38,f60]) ).
fof(f60,plain,
( ? [X0] : ~ one_to_one(identity_relation(X0))
=> ~ one_to_one(identity_relation(sK0)) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f38,plain,
? [X0] : ~ one_to_one(identity_relation(X0)),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).
fof(f29,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] : one_to_one(identity_relation(X0)),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f28]) ).
fof(f28,conjecture,
! [X0] : one_to_one(identity_relation(X0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zimjbcv59a/Vampire---4.8_6468',t52_funct_1) ).
fof(f342,plain,
( one_to_one(identity_relation(sK0))
| ~ function(identity_relation(sK0))
| ~ relation(identity_relation(sK0)) ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f341]) ).
fof(f341,plain,
( sK2(identity_relation(sK0)) != sK2(identity_relation(sK0))
| one_to_one(identity_relation(sK0))
| ~ function(identity_relation(sK0))
| ~ relation(identity_relation(sK0)) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f101,f313]) ).
fof(f313,plain,
sK2(identity_relation(sK0)) = sK3(identity_relation(sK0)),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f312,f272]) ).
fof(f272,plain,
sK2(identity_relation(sK0)) = apply(identity_relation(sK0),sK2(identity_relation(sK0))),
inference(resolution,[],[f212,f196]) ).
fof(f196,plain,
in(sK2(identity_relation(sK0)),sK0),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f170,f190]) ).
fof(f190,plain,
! [X0] : relation_dom(identity_relation(X0)) = X0,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f188,f95]) ).
fof(f188,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ function(identity_relation(X0))
| relation_dom(identity_relation(X0)) = X0 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f140,f94]) ).
fof(f140,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ relation(identity_relation(X0))
| ~ function(identity_relation(X0))
| relation_dom(identity_relation(X0)) = X0 ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f90]) ).
fof(f90,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( relation_dom(X1) = X0
| identity_relation(X0) != X1
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).
fof(f66,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
| ( sK1(X0,X1) != apply(X1,sK1(X0,X1))
& in(sK1(X0,X1),X0) )
| relation_dom(X1) != X0 )
& ( ( ! [X3] :
( apply(X1,X3) = X3
| ~ in(X3,X0) )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 )
| identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1])],[f64,f65]) ).
fof(f65,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) != X2
& in(X2,X0) )
=> ( sK1(X0,X1) != apply(X1,sK1(X0,X1))
& in(sK1(X0,X1),X0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f64,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
| ? [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) != X2
& in(X2,X0) )
| relation_dom(X1) != X0 )
& ( ( ! [X3] :
( apply(X1,X3) = X3
| ~ in(X3,X0) )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 )
| identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f63]) ).
fof(f63,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
| ? [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) != X2
& in(X2,X0) )
| relation_dom(X1) != X0 )
& ( ( ! [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) = X2
| ~ in(X2,X0) )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 )
| identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f62]) ).
fof(f62,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
| ? [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) != X2
& in(X2,X0) )
| relation_dom(X1) != X0 )
& ( ( ! [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) = X2
| ~ in(X2,X0) )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 )
| identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).
fof(f40,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
<=> ( ! [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) = X2
| ~ in(X2,X0) )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f39]) ).
fof(f39,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
<=> ( ! [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) = X2
| ~ in(X2,X0) )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).
fof(f25,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
<=> ( ! [X2] :
( in(X2,X0)
=> apply(X1,X2) = X2 )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zimjbcv59a/Vampire---4.8_6468',t34_funct_1) ).
fof(f170,plain,
in(sK2(identity_relation(sK0)),relation_dom(identity_relation(sK0))),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f169,f94]) ).
fof(f169,plain,
( in(sK2(identity_relation(sK0)),relation_dom(identity_relation(sK0)))
| ~ relation(identity_relation(sK0)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f168,f95]) ).
fof(f168,plain,
( in(sK2(identity_relation(sK0)),relation_dom(identity_relation(sK0)))
| ~ function(identity_relation(sK0))
| ~ relation(identity_relation(sK0)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f98,f89]) ).
fof(f98,plain,
! [X0] :
( one_to_one(X0)
| in(sK2(X0),relation_dom(X0))
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).
fof(f70,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ( one_to_one(X0)
| ( sK2(X0) != sK3(X0)
& apply(X0,sK2(X0)) = apply(X0,sK3(X0))
& in(sK3(X0),relation_dom(X0))
& in(sK2(X0),relation_dom(X0)) ) )
& ( ! [X3,X4] :
( X3 = X4
| apply(X0,X3) != apply(X0,X4)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X0))
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) )
| ~ one_to_one(X0) ) )
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3])],[f68,f69]) ).
fof(f69,plain,
! [X0] :
( ? [X1,X2] :
( X1 != X2
& apply(X0,X1) = apply(X0,X2)
& in(X2,relation_dom(X0))
& in(X1,relation_dom(X0)) )
=> ( sK2(X0) != sK3(X0)
& apply(X0,sK2(X0)) = apply(X0,sK3(X0))
& in(sK3(X0),relation_dom(X0))
& in(sK2(X0),relation_dom(X0)) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f68,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ( one_to_one(X0)
| ? [X1,X2] :
( X1 != X2
& apply(X0,X1) = apply(X0,X2)
& in(X2,relation_dom(X0))
& in(X1,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
& ( ! [X3,X4] :
( X3 = X4
| apply(X0,X3) != apply(X0,X4)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X0))
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) )
| ~ one_to_one(X0) ) )
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f67]) ).
fof(f67,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ( one_to_one(X0)
| ? [X1,X2] :
( X1 != X2
& apply(X0,X1) = apply(X0,X2)
& in(X2,relation_dom(X0))
& in(X1,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
& ( ! [X1,X2] :
( X1 = X2
| apply(X0,X1) != apply(X0,X2)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X0))
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0)) )
| ~ one_to_one(X0) ) )
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).
fof(f42,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( one_to_one(X0)
<=> ! [X1,X2] :
( X1 = X2
| apply(X0,X1) != apply(X0,X2)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X0))
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f41]) ).
fof(f41,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( one_to_one(X0)
<=> ! [X1,X2] :
( X1 = X2
| apply(X0,X1) != apply(X0,X2)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X0))
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ( function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ( one_to_one(X0)
<=> ! [X1,X2] :
( ( apply(X0,X1) = apply(X0,X2)
& in(X2,relation_dom(X0))
& in(X1,relation_dom(X0)) )
=> X1 = X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zimjbcv59a/Vampire---4.8_6468',d8_funct_1) ).
fof(f212,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ in(X0,X1)
| apply(identity_relation(X1),X0) = X0 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f210,f95]) ).
fof(f210,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ in(X0,X1)
| ~ function(identity_relation(X1))
| apply(identity_relation(X1),X0) = X0 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f139,f94]) ).
fof(f139,plain,
! [X3,X0] :
( ~ relation(identity_relation(X0))
| ~ in(X3,X0)
| ~ function(identity_relation(X0))
| apply(identity_relation(X0),X3) = X3 ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f91]) ).
fof(f91,plain,
! [X3,X0,X1] :
( apply(X1,X3) = X3
| ~ in(X3,X0)
| identity_relation(X0) != X1
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).
fof(f312,plain,
sK3(identity_relation(sK0)) = apply(identity_relation(sK0),sK2(identity_relation(sK0))),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f311,f94]) ).
fof(f311,plain,
( sK3(identity_relation(sK0)) = apply(identity_relation(sK0),sK2(identity_relation(sK0)))
| ~ relation(identity_relation(sK0)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f310,f95]) ).
fof(f310,plain,
( sK3(identity_relation(sK0)) = apply(identity_relation(sK0),sK2(identity_relation(sK0)))
| ~ function(identity_relation(sK0))
| ~ relation(identity_relation(sK0)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f304,f89]) ).
fof(f304,plain,
( sK3(identity_relation(sK0)) = apply(identity_relation(sK0),sK2(identity_relation(sK0)))
| one_to_one(identity_relation(sK0))
| ~ function(identity_relation(sK0))
| ~ relation(identity_relation(sK0)) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f271,f100]) ).
fof(f100,plain,
! [X0] :
( apply(X0,sK2(X0)) = apply(X0,sK3(X0))
| one_to_one(X0)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).
fof(f271,plain,
sK3(identity_relation(sK0)) = apply(identity_relation(sK0),sK3(identity_relation(sK0))),
inference(resolution,[],[f212,f191]) ).
fof(f191,plain,
in(sK3(identity_relation(sK0)),sK0),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f186,f190]) ).
fof(f186,plain,
in(sK3(identity_relation(sK0)),relation_dom(identity_relation(sK0))),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f185,f94]) ).
fof(f185,plain,
( in(sK3(identity_relation(sK0)),relation_dom(identity_relation(sK0)))
| ~ relation(identity_relation(sK0)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f184,f95]) ).
fof(f184,plain,
( in(sK3(identity_relation(sK0)),relation_dom(identity_relation(sK0)))
| ~ function(identity_relation(sK0))
| ~ relation(identity_relation(sK0)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f99,f89]) ).
fof(f99,plain,
! [X0] :
( one_to_one(X0)
| in(sK3(X0),relation_dom(X0))
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).
fof(f101,plain,
! [X0] :
( sK2(X0) != sK3(X0)
| one_to_one(X0)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SEU019+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 16:29:55 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.36 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.16/0.37 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zimjbcv59a/Vampire---4.8_6468
% 0.56/0.75 % (6728)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.56/0.75 % (6722)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.75 % (6724)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.56/0.75 % (6723)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.56/0.75 % (6726)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.75 % (6727)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.56/0.75 % (6725)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.56/0.75 % (6727)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6727)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75 % (6727)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.56/0.75 % (6725)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6725)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75 % (6725)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.56/0.75 % (6725)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 % (6725)Memory used [KB]: 1026
% 0.56/0.75 % (6725)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.75 % (6725)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.56/0.75 % (6725)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75 % (6725)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75 % (6727)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 % (6727)Memory used [KB]: 1030
% 0.56/0.75 % (6727)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.75 % (6727)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.56/0.75 % (6727)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75 % (6727)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75 % (6726)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6726)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75 % (6726)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.56/0.75 % (6726)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 % (6726)Memory used [KB]: 1052
% 0.56/0.75 % (6726)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.75 % (6726)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.56/0.75 % (6726)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75 % (6726)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75 % (6722)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6722)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75 % (6722)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.56/0.75 % (6722)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 % (6722)Memory used [KB]: 1048
% 0.56/0.75 % (6722)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.56/0.75 % (6722)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.56/0.75 % (6722)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.75 % (6722)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.76 % (6729)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.56/0.76 % (6733)lrs-1011_1:1_sil=4000:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:sp=frequency:plsql=on:nwc=10.0:i=52:aac=none:afr=on:ss=axioms:er=filter:sgt=16:rawr=on:etr=on:lma=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/52Mi)
% 0.56/0.76 % (6730)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.56/0.76 % (6732)lrs+1010_1:2_sil=4000:tgt=ground:nwc=10.0:st=2.0:i=208:sd=1:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/208Mi)
% 0.56/0.76 % (6731)dis+3_25:4_sil=16000:sos=all:erd=off:i=50:s2at=4.0:bd=off:nm=60:sup=off:cond=on:av=off:ins=2:nwc=10.0:etr=on:to=lpo:s2agt=20:fd=off:bsr=unit_only:slsq=on:slsqr=28,19:awrs=converge:awrsf=500:tgt=ground:bs=unit_only_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/50Mi)
% 0.56/0.76 % (6724)First to succeed.
% 0.56/0.76 % (6729)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6729)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.76 % (6729)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.56/0.76 % (6729)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.76
% 0.56/0.76 % (6729)Memory used [KB]: 1046
% 0.56/0.76 % (6729)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.56/0.76 % (6729)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.56/0.76 % (6729)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.76 % (6729)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.76 % (6732)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.56/0.76 % (6724)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.56/0.76 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.56/0.76 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.76 % (6724)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.76 % (6724)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.56/0.76 % (6724)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.56/0.76
% 0.56/0.76 % (6724)Memory used [KB]: 1144
% 0.56/0.76 % (6724)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.56/0.76 % (6724)Instructions burned: 14 (million)
% 0.56/0.76 % (6724)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.76 % (6724)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.76 % (6718)Success in time 0.385 s
% 0.56/0.76 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------