TSTP Solution File: SEU019+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SEU019+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:18:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (  13 unt;   3 nHn;  16 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   38 (  11 equ;  18 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | one_to_one(X)
    | in('SKOLEMAAAU1'(X),relation_dom(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | one_to_one(X)
    | in('SKOLEMAAAU2'(X),relation_dom(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | one_to_one(X)
    | apply(X,'SKOLEMAAAU1'(X)) = apply(X,'SKOLEMAAAU2'(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | one_to_one(X)
    | 'SKOLEMAAAU1'(X) != 'SKOLEMAAAU2'(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    relation(identity_relation(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k6_relat_1) ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    function(identity_relation(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_funct_1) ).

cnf(34,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | X != identity_relation(Y)
    | relation_dom(X) = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t34_funct_1) ).

cnf(35,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | X != identity_relation(Y)
    | ~ in(Z,Y)
    | apply(X,Z) = Z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t34_funct_1) ).

cnf(41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ one_to_one(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t52_funct_1) ).

cnf(78,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAU1'(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13')),relation_dom(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13'))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,9,14,41]) ).

cnf(81,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAU2'(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13')),relation_dom(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13'))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[6,9,14,41]) ).

cnf(83,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAU1'(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13')) != 'SKOLEMAAAU2'(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[8,9,14,41]) ).

cnf(84,plain,
    relation_dom(identity_relation(X)) = X,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[34,9,14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(87,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAU1'(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13')),'SKOLEMAAAU13'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[78,84,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(88,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAU2'(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13')),'SKOLEMAAAU13'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[81,84,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(90,plain,
    apply(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13'),'SKOLEMAAAU1'(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13'))) = apply(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13'),'SKOLEMAAAU2'(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13'))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[7,9,14,41]) ).

cnf(148,plain,
    apply(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13'),'SKOLEMAAAU1'(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13'))) = 'SKOLEMAAAU1'(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[35,87,9,14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(149,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAU1'(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13')) = apply(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13'),'SKOLEMAAAU2'(identity_relation('SKOLEMAAAU13'))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[90,148,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(162,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[35,88,9,14,theory(equality)]),83,149,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU019+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 14:14:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-19T14:14:39
% 0.19/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n011.cluster.edu at 2022-06-19T14:14:39
% 0.19/0.49  WARNING:
% 0.19/0.49     |relation_empty_yielding| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.19/0.54  
% 0.19/0.54  
% 0.19/0.54  #||
% 0.19/0.54  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.54  ||#
% 0.19/0.54  
% 0.19/0.54  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.19/0.54  ;       325 formulas have been input or derived (from 85 formulas).
% 0.19/0.54  ;       162 (50%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.19/0.54  ;           22 (14%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.19/0.54  ;          140 (86%) are still being kept.
% 0.19/0.54  ; 
% 0.19/0.54  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.005   8%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.002   3%   Assert                       (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.016  26%   Process new row              (263 calls)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.008  13%   Resolution                   (168 calls)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (84 calls)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (1 call)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.001   2%   Condensing                   (50 calls)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.001   2%   Forward subsumption          (50 calls)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (49 calls)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (6 calls)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.001   2%   Forward simplification       (250 calls)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.002   3%   Backward simplification      (162 calls)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.001   2%   Ordering                     (80 calls)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.001   2%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.023  38%   Other
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.061        Total
% 0.19/0.54  ;     0.064        Real time
% 0.19/0.54  ; 
% 0.19/0.54  ; Term-hash-array has 263 terms in all.
% 0.19/0.54  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 43 entries (43 at peak, 49 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.19/0.54  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 181 nodes (181 at peak, 215 added, 34 deleted).
% 0.19/0.54  ;  Retrieved 5 possibly forward subsuming rows in 50 calls.
% 0.19/0.54  ;  Retrieved 1 possibly backward subsumed row in 49 calls.
% 0.19/0.54  ; Path-index has 241 entries (241 at peak, 275 added, 34 deleted).
% 0.19/0.54  ; Path-index has 433 nodes (433 at peak, 475 added, 42 deleted).
% 0.19/0.54  ; Trie-index has 241 entries (241 at peak, 275 added, 34 deleted).
% 0.19/0.54  ; Trie-index has 565 nodes (565 at peak, 647 added, 82 deleted).
% 0.19/0.54  ; Retrieved 148 generalization terms in 395 calls.
% 0.19/0.54  ; Retrieved 124 instance terms in 112 calls.
% 0.19/0.54  ; Retrieved 4,298 unifiable terms in 1,297 calls.
% 0.19/0.54  ; 
% 0.19/0.54  ; The agenda of rows to give has 61 entries:
% 0.19/0.54  ;    12 with value (4 9)           5 with value (4 14)           1 with value (4 22)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     9 with value (4 10)          2 with value (4 15)           1 with value (4 23)
% 0.19/0.54  ;    10 with value (4 11)          2 with value (4 16)           1 with value (4 25)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     6 with value (4 12)          2 with value (4 19)           1 with value (4 29)
% 0.19/0.54  ;     7 with value (4 13)          1 with value (4 20)           1 with value (4 31)
% 0.19/0.54  Evaluation took:
% 0.19/0.54    0.065 seconds of real time
% 0.19/0.54    0.056718 seconds of user run time
% 0.19/0.54    0.008053 seconds of system run time
% 0.19/0.54    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.19/0.54    0 page faults and
% 0.19/0.54    4,388,928 bytes consed.
% 0.19/0.54  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.54  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-19T14:14:39
% 0.19/0.54  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.54  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------