TSTP Solution File: SEU011+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:38:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 14.72s 3.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 14.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   52 (  14 unt;   3 nHn;  40 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  190 (  61 equ; 138 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  117 (  10 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != set_intersection2(X3,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_8) ).

cnf(i_0_55,plain,
    ( apply(X1,X2) = X2
    | X1 != identity_relation(X3)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_55) ).

cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    relation(identity_relation(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_24,plain,
    function(identity_relation(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_24) ).

cnf(i_0_50,plain,
    ( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_50) ).

cnf(i_0_33,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_33) ).

cnf(i_0_66,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(X2)
    | apply(X1,esk14_2(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,esk14_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_66) ).

cnf(i_0_56,plain,
    ( relation_dom(X1) = X2
    | X1 != identity_relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_56) ).

cnf(i_0_57,plain,
    ( relation_dom(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X1)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_57) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != set_intersection2(X4,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != set_intersection2(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_67,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | in(esk14_2(X1,X2),relation_dom(X1))
    | relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_67) ).

cnf(i_0_19,plain,
    ( function(relation_composition(X1,X2))
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_19) ).

cnf(i_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    relation_composition(identity_relation(esk13_0),identity_relation(esk12_0)) != identity_relation(set_intersection2(esk12_0,esk13_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_60) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    ( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7nlhkr2p/input.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(c_0_84,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != set_intersection2(X3,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_85,plain,
    ( apply(X1,X2) = X2
    | X1 != identity_relation(X3)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,X3) ),
    i_0_55 ).

cnf(c_0_86,plain,
    ( in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3))
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_84]) ).

cnf(c_0_87,plain,
    ( apply(X1,X2) = X2
    | X1 != identity_relation(set_intersection2(X3,X4))
    | ~ in(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X2,X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_86]) ).

cnf(c_0_88,plain,
    relation(identity_relation(X1)),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_89,plain,
    function(identity_relation(X1)),
    i_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_90,plain,
    ( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2))) ),
    i_0_50 ).

cnf(c_0_91,plain,
    ( apply(identity_relation(set_intersection2(X1,X2)),X3) = X3
    | ~ in(X3,X2)
    | ~ in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_87]),c_0_88]),c_0_89])]) ).

cnf(c_0_92,plain,
    ( apply(relation_composition(X1,identity_relation(set_intersection2(X2,X3))),X4) = apply(X1,X4)
    | ~ in(X4,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,identity_relation(set_intersection2(X2,X3)))))
    | ~ in(apply(X1,X4),X3)
    | ~ in(apply(X1,X4),X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_91]),c_0_88]),c_0_89])]) ).

cnf(c_0_93,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,X1) = X1,
    i_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_94,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(X2)
    | apply(X1,esk14_2(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,esk14_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_66 ).

cnf(c_0_95,plain,
    ( apply(relation_composition(X1,identity_relation(X2)),X3) = apply(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,identity_relation(X2))))
    | ~ in(apply(X1,X3),X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_92,c_0_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_96,plain,
    ( relation_dom(X1) = X2
    | X1 != identity_relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_56 ).

cnf(c_0_97,plain,
    ( X1 = relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X3))
    | apply(X1,esk14_2(X1,relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X3)))) != apply(X2,esk14_2(X1,relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X3))))
    | relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X3)))
    | ~ in(esk14_2(X1,relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X3))),relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X3))))
    | ~ in(apply(X2,esk14_2(X1,relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X3)))),X3)
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X3)))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ function(relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X3)))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ function(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_95]) ).

cnf(c_0_98,plain,
    ( relation_dom(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X1)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    i_0_57 ).

cnf(c_0_99,plain,
    relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_96]),c_0_88]),c_0_89])]) ).

cnf(c_0_100,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != set_intersection2(X4,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_101,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != set_intersection2(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_102,plain,
    ( X1 = relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),identity_relation(X3))
    | apply(X1,esk14_2(X1,relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),identity_relation(X3)))) != apply(identity_relation(X2),esk14_2(X1,relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),identity_relation(X3))))
    | relation_dom(X1) != set_intersection2(X3,X2)
    | ~ in(apply(identity_relation(X2),esk14_2(X1,relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),identity_relation(X3)))),X3)
    | ~ in(esk14_2(X1,relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),identity_relation(X3))),set_intersection2(X3,X2))
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),identity_relation(X3)))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),identity_relation(X3)))
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_97,c_0_98]),c_0_99]),c_0_99]),c_0_88]),c_0_89]),c_0_88]),c_0_89])]) ).

cnf(c_0_103,plain,
    ( apply(identity_relation(X1),X2) = X2
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_104,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,set_intersection2(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_100]) ).

cnf(c_0_105,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_101]) ).

cnf(c_0_106,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | in(esk14_2(X1,X2),relation_dom(X1))
    | relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_67 ).

cnf(c_0_107,plain,
    ( X1 = relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),identity_relation(X3))
    | apply(X1,esk14_2(X1,relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),identity_relation(X3)))) != esk14_2(X1,relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),identity_relation(X3)))
    | relation_dom(X1) != set_intersection2(X3,X2)
    | ~ in(esk14_2(X1,relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),identity_relation(X3))),set_intersection2(X3,X2))
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),identity_relation(X3)))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),identity_relation(X3)))
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_102,c_0_103]),c_0_104]),c_0_105]) ).

cnf(c_0_108,plain,
    ( identity_relation(X1) = X2
    | in(esk14_2(identity_relation(X1),X2),X1)
    | X1 != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_106,c_0_99]),c_0_88]),c_0_89])]) ).

cnf(c_0_109,plain,
    ( relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2)) = identity_relation(set_intersection2(X2,X1))
    | apply(identity_relation(set_intersection2(X2,X1)),esk14_2(identity_relation(set_intersection2(X2,X1)),relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2)))) != esk14_2(identity_relation(set_intersection2(X2,X1)),relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2)))
    | relation_dom(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2))) != set_intersection2(X2,X1)
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2)))
    | ~ function(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_108]),c_0_99]),c_0_88]),c_0_89])]) ).

cnf(c_0_110,plain,
    ( relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2)) = identity_relation(set_intersection2(X2,X1))
    | relation_dom(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2))) != set_intersection2(X2,X1)
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2)))
    | ~ function(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2))) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_103]),c_0_108]) ).

cnf(c_0_111,plain,
    ( relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2)) = identity_relation(set_intersection2(X2,X1))
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2)))
    | ~ function(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_110,c_0_98]),c_0_99]),c_0_88]),c_0_89])]) ).

cnf(c_0_112,plain,
    ( function(relation_composition(X1,X2))
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_113,negated_conjecture,
    relation_composition(identity_relation(esk13_0),identity_relation(esk12_0)) != identity_relation(set_intersection2(esk12_0,esk13_0)),
    i_0_60 ).

cnf(c_0_114,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_115,plain,
    ( relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2)) = identity_relation(set_intersection2(X2,X1))
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_112]),c_0_88]),c_0_88]),c_0_89]),c_0_89])]) ).

cnf(c_0_116,plain,
    ( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_117,negated_conjecture,
    relation_composition(identity_relation(esk13_0),identity_relation(esk12_0)) != identity_relation(set_intersection2(esk13_0,esk12_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_113,c_0_114]) ).

cnf(c_0_118,plain,
    relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),identity_relation(X2)) = identity_relation(set_intersection2(X2,X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_116]),c_0_88]),c_0_88])]) ).

cnf(c_0_119,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_117,c_0_118]),c_0_114])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SEU011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 22:51:41 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 14.72/3.27  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by Enigma+tptp-cade20-model02-h2e15+lgb-t150-d30-l6400-e0.15+coop-mzr02:
% 14.72/3.27  # ENIGMA: LightGBM model '/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/data/Enigma/tptp-cade20-model02-h2e15/lgb-t150-d30-l6400-e0.15/model.lgb' loaded. (hash_base: 32768; conj_feats: 29; version: 991; iters: 150)
% 14.72/3.27  # Preprocessing time       : 0.862 s
% 14.72/3.27  
% 14.72/3.27  # Proof found!
% 14.72/3.27  # SZS status Theorem
% 14.72/3.27  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 14.72/3.27  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 14.72/3.27  
% 14.72/3.27  # -------------------------------------------------
% 14.72/3.27  # User time                : 0.856 s
% 14.72/3.27  # System time              : 0.095 s
% 14.72/3.27  # Total time               : 0.952 s
% 14.72/3.27  # ...preprocessing         : 0.862 s
% 14.72/3.27  # ...main loop             : 0.090 s
% 14.72/3.27  # Maximum resident set size: 167324 pages
% 14.72/3.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------