TSTP Solution File: SEU009+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU009+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:33:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.48s 0.65s
% Output   : Refutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   33 (  14 unt;   2 nHn;  33 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   90 (   0 equ;  60 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    relation(skc9),
    file('SEU009+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    function(skc9),
    file('SEU009+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    relation(identity_relation(u)),
    file('SEU009+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    function(identity_relation(u)),
    file('SEU009+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(47,axiom,
    ( in(skc10,relation_dom(skc9))
    | in(skc10,relation_dom(relation_composition(skc9,identity_relation(skc11)))) ),
    file('SEU009+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(48,axiom,
    ( in(skc10,relation_dom(relation_composition(skc9,identity_relation(skc11))))
    | in(apply(skc9,skc10),skc11) ),
    file('SEU009+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(51,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ equal(u,identity_relation(v))
    | equal(relation_dom(u),v) ),
    file('SEU009+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(54,axiom,
    ( ~ in(skc10,relation_dom(skc9))
    | ~ in(skc10,relation_dom(relation_composition(skc9,identity_relation(skc11))))
    | ~ in(apply(skc9,skc10),skc11) ),
    file('SEU009+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(57,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ relation(v)
    | ~ function(v)
    | ~ in(w,relation_dom(relation_composition(v,u)))
    | in(w,relation_dom(v)) ),
    file('SEU009+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(59,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ relation(v)
    | ~ function(v)
    | ~ in(w,relation_dom(relation_composition(v,u)))
    | in(apply(v,w),relation_dom(u)) ),
    file('SEU009+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(60,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ relation(v)
    | ~ function(v)
    | ~ in(w,relation_dom(v))
    | ~ in(apply(v,w),relation_dom(u))
    | in(w,relation_dom(relation_composition(v,u))) ),
    file('SEU009+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(73,plain,
    ( ~ function(skc9)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ relation(u)
    | ~ in(v,relation_dom(skc9))
    | ~ in(apply(skc9,v),relation_dom(u))
    | in(v,relation_dom(relation_composition(skc9,u))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,60]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,60.1')] ).

cnf(74,plain,
    ( ~ function(skc9)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ relation(u)
    | ~ in(v,relation_dom(relation_composition(skc9,u)))
    | in(apply(skc9,v),relation_dom(u)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,59]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,59.1')] ).

cnf(101,plain,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ in(v,relation_dom(relation_composition(skc9,u)))
    | in(apply(skc9,v),relation_dom(u)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[74,2]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:74.0,2.0')] ).

cnf(103,plain,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ in(v,relation_dom(skc9))
    | ~ in(apply(skc9,v),relation_dom(u))
    | in(v,relation_dom(relation_composition(skc9,u))) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[73,2]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:73.0,2.0')] ).

cnf(126,plain,
    in(skc10,relation_dom(relation_composition(skc9,identity_relation(skc11)))),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s1)])],[47]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:47.1')] ).

cnf(127,plain,
    ( ~ in(skc10,relation_dom(skc9))
    | ~ in(apply(skc9,skc10),skc11) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[54,126]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:54.1,126.0')] ).

cnf(269,plain,
    ( ~ relation(identity_relation(u))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(u))
    | equal(relation_dom(identity_relation(u)),u) ),
    inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[51]),
    [iquote('0:EqR:51.2')] ).

cnf(270,plain,
    equal(relation_dom(identity_relation(u)),u),
    inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[269,19,18]),
    [iquote('0:SSi:269.1,269.0,19.0,18.0,19.0,18.0')] ).

cnf(350,plain,
    ( ~ relation(identity_relation(skc11))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(skc11))
    | ~ relation(skc9)
    | ~ function(skc9)
    | in(skc10,relation_dom(skc9)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[126,57]),
    [iquote('1:Res:126.0,57.4')] ).

cnf(353,plain,
    in(skc10,relation_dom(skc9)),
    inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[350,2,1,19,18]),
    [iquote('1:SSi:350.3,350.2,350.1,350.0,2.0,1.0,2.0,1.0,19.0,18.0,19.0,18.0')] ).

cnf(354,plain,
    ~ in(apply(skc9,skc10),skc11),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[127,353]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:127.0,353.0')] ).

cnf(868,plain,
    ( ~ relation(identity_relation(u))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(u))
    | ~ in(v,relation_dom(relation_composition(skc9,identity_relation(u))))
    | in(apply(skc9,v),u) ),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[270,101]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:270.0,101.3')] ).

cnf(879,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,relation_dom(relation_composition(skc9,identity_relation(v))))
    | in(apply(skc9,u),v) ),
    inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[868,19,18]),
    [iquote('0:SSi:868.1,868.0,19.0,18.0,19.0,18.0')] ).

cnf(1016,plain,
    ( ~ relation(identity_relation(u))
    | ~ function(identity_relation(u))
    | ~ in(v,relation_dom(skc9))
    | ~ in(apply(skc9,v),u)
    | in(v,relation_dom(relation_composition(skc9,identity_relation(u)))) ),
    inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[270,103]),
    [iquote('0:SpL:270.0,103.3')] ).

cnf(1021,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,relation_dom(skc9))
    | ~ in(apply(skc9,u),v)
    | in(u,relation_dom(relation_composition(skc9,identity_relation(v)))) ),
    inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[1016,19,18]),
    [iquote('0:SSi:1016.1,1016.0,19.0,18.0,19.0,18.0')] ).

cnf(1251,plain,
    in(apply(skc9,skc10),skc11),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[126,879]),
    [iquote('1:Res:126.0,879.0')] ).

cnf(1263,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[1251,354]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:1251.0,354.0')] ).

cnf(1272,plain,
    ~ in(skc10,relation_dom(relation_composition(skc9,identity_relation(skc11)))),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(sa)])],[1263,126]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:1263.0,47.1,126.0')] ).

cnf(1273,plain,
    in(skc10,relation_dom(skc9)),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2)])],[47]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:1263.0,47.0')] ).

cnf(1279,plain,
    in(apply(skc9,skc10),skc11),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[48,879]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:48.0,879.0')] ).

cnf(1772,plain,
    ( ~ in(skc10,relation_dom(skc9))
    | ~ in(apply(skc9,skc10),skc11) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1021,1272]),
    [iquote('1:Res:1021.2,1272.0')] ).

cnf(1779,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[1772,1273,1279]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:1772.0,1772.1,1273.0,1279.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : SEU009+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 05:59:29 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.48/0.65  
% 0.48/0.65  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.48/0.65  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.48/0.65  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.48/0.65  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.48/0.65  SPASS derived 1346 clauses, backtracked 59 clauses, performed 3 splits and kept 674 clauses.
% 0.48/0.65  SPASS allocated 99241 KBytes.
% 0.48/0.65  SPASS spent	0:00:00.26 on the problem.
% 0.48/0.65  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.48/0.65  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.48/0.65  		0:00:00.02 for inferences.
% 0.48/0.65  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.48/0.65  		0:00:00.14 for the reduction.
% 0.48/0.65  
% 0.48/0.65  
% 0.48/0.65  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 33 :
% 0.48/0.65  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.48/0.65  Formulae used in the proof : t40_funct_1 fc2_funct_1 t34_funct_1 t21_funct_1
% 0.48/0.65  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------