TSTP Solution File: SEU009+1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SEU009+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:11:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.41s
% Output : Proof 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
relation(sK12),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
function(sK12),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
( in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,identity_relation(sK10))))
| in(sK11,relation_dom(sK12)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( in(apply(sK12,sK11),sK10)
| in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,identity_relation(sK10)))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ in(apply(sK12,sK11),sK10)
| ~ in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,identity_relation(sK10))))
| ~ in(sK11,relation_dom(sK12)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,identity_relation(sK10))))
| ~ function(identity_relation(sK10))
| ~ function(sK12)
| ~ relation(identity_relation(sK10))
| ~ relation(sK12)
| in(sK11,relation_dom(sK12)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t21_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,identity_relation(sK10))))
| ~ function(identity_relation(sK10))
| ~ function(sK12)
| ~ relation(identity_relation(sK10))
| ~ relation(sK12)
| in(apply(sK12,sK11),relation_dom(identity_relation(sK10))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t21_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ in(sK11,relation_dom(sK12))
| ~ in(apply(sK12,sK11),relation_dom(identity_relation(sK10)))
| ~ function(identity_relation(sK10))
| ~ function(sK12)
| ~ relation(identity_relation(sK10))
| ~ relation(sK12)
| in(sK11,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK12,identity_relation(sK10)))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t21_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
function(identity_relation(sK10)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
relation(identity_relation(sK10)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k6_relat_1)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
sPE(identity_relation(sK10),identity_relation(sK10)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
sPE(apply(sK12,sK11),apply(sK12,sK11)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g12,plain,
( ~ sPE(apply(sK12,sK11),apply(sK12,sK11))
| ~ sPE(relation_dom(identity_relation(sK10)),sK10)
| ~ in(apply(sK12,sK11),relation_dom(identity_relation(sK10)))
| in(apply(sK12,sK11),sK10) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g13,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_dom(identity_relation(sK10)),sK10)
| sPE(sK10,relation_dom(identity_relation(sK10))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g14,plain,
( ~ sPE(identity_relation(sK10),identity_relation(sK10))
| ~ function(identity_relation(sK10))
| ~ relation(identity_relation(sK10))
| sPE(relation_dom(identity_relation(sK10)),sK10) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t34_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g15,plain,
( ~ sPE(apply(sK12,sK11),apply(sK12,sK11))
| ~ sPE(sK10,relation_dom(identity_relation(sK10)))
| ~ in(apply(sK12,sK11),sK10)
| in(apply(sK12,sK11),relation_dom(identity_relation(sK10))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU009+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 05:58:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.41 % symbols: 28
% 0.20/0.41 % clauses: 79
% 0.20/0.41 % start clauses: 5
% 0.20/0.41 % iterative deepening steps: 150
% 0.20/0.41 % maximum path limit: 3
% 0.20/0.41 % literal attempts: 99334
% 0.20/0.41 % depth failures: 82208
% 0.20/0.41 % regularity failures: 1316
% 0.20/0.41 % tautology failures: 1232
% 0.20/0.41 % reductions: 3329
% 0.20/0.41 % extensions: 95371
% 0.20/0.41 % SAT variables: 12502
% 0.20/0.41 % SAT clauses: 14832
% 0.20/0.41 % WalkSAT solutions: 14828
% 0.20/0.41 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.20/0.41 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.41 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------