TSTP Solution File: SEU009+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU009+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:37:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 4.55s 2.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  13 unt;   4 nHn;  25 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   84 (   5 equ;  54 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_48,plain,
    ( relation_dom(X1) = X2
    | X1 != identity_relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wkpv49rq/lgb.p',i_0_48) ).

cnf(i_0_5,plain,
    relation(identity_relation(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wkpv49rq/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_16,plain,
    function(identity_relation(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wkpv49rq/lgb.p',i_0_16) ).

cnf(i_0_43,plain,
    ( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wkpv49rq/lgb.p',i_0_43) ).

cnf(i_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk12_0,relation_dom(esk13_0))
    | in(esk12_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk13_0,identity_relation(esk11_0)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wkpv49rq/lgb.p',i_0_52) ).

cnf(i_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk13_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wkpv49rq/lgb.p',i_0_55) ).

cnf(i_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk13_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wkpv49rq/lgb.p',i_0_54) ).

cnf(i_0_42,plain,
    ( in(apply(X1,X2),relation_dom(X3))
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wkpv49rq/lgb.p',i_0_42) ).

cnf(i_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk12_0,relation_dom(esk13_0))
    | ~ in(apply(esk13_0,esk12_0),esk11_0)
    | ~ in(esk12_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk13_0,identity_relation(esk11_0)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wkpv49rq/lgb.p',i_0_53) ).

cnf(i_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(apply(esk13_0,esk12_0),esk11_0)
    | in(esk12_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk13_0,identity_relation(esk11_0)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wkpv49rq/lgb.p',i_0_51) ).

cnf(i_0_41,plain,
    ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X3)))
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ in(apply(X2,X1),relation_dom(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wkpv49rq/lgb.p',i_0_41) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    ( relation_dom(X1) = X2
    | X1 != identity_relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_48 ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    relation(identity_relation(X1)),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    function(identity_relation(X1)),
    i_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    ( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X3))) ),
    i_0_43 ).

cnf(c_0_71,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk12_0,relation_dom(esk13_0))
    | in(esk12_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk13_0,identity_relation(esk11_0)))) ),
    i_0_52 ).

cnf(c_0_72,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk13_0),
    i_0_55 ).

cnf(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk13_0),
    i_0_54 ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( in(apply(X1,X2),relation_dom(X3))
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X3))) ),
    i_0_42 ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_67]),c_0_68]),c_0_69])]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk12_0,relation_dom(esk13_0))
    | ~ in(apply(esk13_0,esk12_0),esk11_0)
    | ~ in(esk12_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk13_0,identity_relation(esk11_0)))) ),
    i_0_53 ).

cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk12_0,relation_dom(esk13_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_71]),c_0_68]),c_0_72]),c_0_69]),c_0_73])]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,plain,
    ( in(apply(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,identity_relation(X3)))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75]),c_0_68]),c_0_69])]) ).

cnf(c_0_79,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(apply(esk13_0,esk12_0),esk11_0)
    | in(esk12_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk13_0,identity_relation(esk11_0)))) ),
    i_0_51 ).

cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk12_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk13_0,identity_relation(esk11_0))))
    | ~ in(apply(esk13_0,esk12_0),esk11_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_77])]) ).

cnf(c_0_81,negated_conjecture,
    in(apply(esk13_0,esk12_0),esk11_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_79]),c_0_72]),c_0_73])]) ).

cnf(c_0_82,plain,
    ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X3)))
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ in(apply(X2,X1),relation_dom(X3)) ),
    i_0_41 ).

cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk12_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk13_0,identity_relation(esk11_0)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81])]) ).

cnf(c_0_84,plain,
    ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,identity_relation(X3))))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ in(apply(X2,X1),X3)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_75]),c_0_68]),c_0_69])]) ).

cnf(c_0_85,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84]),c_0_72]),c_0_73]),c_0_81]),c_0_77])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SEU009+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 05:49:50 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.55/2.27  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.55/2.27  # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.55/2.27  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.55/2.27  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 4.55/2.27  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 4.55/2.27  #
% 4.55/2.27  # Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 4.55/2.27  
% 4.55/2.27  # Proof found!
% 4.55/2.27  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.55/2.27  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.55/2.27  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.55/2.27  
% 4.55/2.27  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.55/2.27  # User time                : 0.032 s
% 4.55/2.27  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 4.55/2.27  # Total time               : 0.034 s
% 4.55/2.27  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 4.55/2.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------