TSTP Solution File: SEU003+1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SEU003+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:11:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 73.65s 9.87s
% Output : Proof 73.65s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
relation(sK13),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t27_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
function(sK13),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t27_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
relation(sK14),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t27_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
function(sK14),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t27_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
sPE(relation_dom(relation_composition(sK14,sK13)),relation_dom(sK14)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t27_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
~ subset(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t27_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_dom(relation_composition(sK14,sK13)),relation_dom(sK14))
| sPE(relation_dom(sK14),relation_dom(relation_composition(sK14,sK13))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ in(sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)),relation_dom(sK13))
| subset(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( in(sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)),relation_rng(sK14))
| subset(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
sPE(relation_rng(sK14),relation_rng(sK14)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_rng(sK14),relation_rng(sK14))
| ~ in(sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)),relation_rng(sK14))
| ~ function(sK14)
| ~ relation(sK14)
| sPE(sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)),apply(sK14,sK1(sK14,relation_rng(sK14),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13))))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_rng(sK14),relation_rng(sK14))
| ~ in(sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)),relation_rng(sK14))
| ~ function(sK14)
| ~ relation(sK14)
| in(sK1(sK14,relation_rng(sK14),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13))),relation_dom(sK14)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g12,plain,
sPE(relation_dom(sK13),relation_dom(sK13)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g13,plain,
( ~ sPE(sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)),apply(sK14,sK1(sK14,relation_rng(sK14),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)))))
| sPE(apply(sK14,sK1(sK14,relation_rng(sK14),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)))),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g14,plain,
sPE(sK1(sK14,relation_rng(sK14),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13))),sK1(sK14,relation_rng(sK14),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g15,plain,
( ~ sPE(sK1(sK14,relation_rng(sK14),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13))),sK1(sK14,relation_rng(sK14),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13))))
| ~ sPE(relation_dom(sK14),relation_dom(relation_composition(sK14,sK13)))
| ~ in(sK1(sK14,relation_rng(sK14),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13))),relation_dom(sK14))
| in(sK1(sK14,relation_rng(sK14),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13))),relation_dom(relation_composition(sK14,sK13))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g16,plain,
( ~ in(sK1(sK14,relation_rng(sK14),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13))),relation_dom(relation_composition(sK14,sK13)))
| ~ function(sK13)
| ~ function(sK14)
| ~ relation(sK13)
| ~ relation(sK14)
| in(apply(sK14,sK1(sK14,relation_rng(sK14),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)))),relation_dom(sK13)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t21_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g17,plain,
( ~ sPE(apply(sK14,sK1(sK14,relation_rng(sK14),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)))),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)))
| ~ sPE(relation_dom(sK13),relation_dom(sK13))
| ~ in(apply(sK14,sK1(sK14,relation_rng(sK14),sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)))),relation_dom(sK13))
| in(sK0(relation_rng(sK14),relation_dom(sK13)),relation_dom(sK13)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SEU003+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 21:25:33 EDT 2022
% 0.19/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 73.65/9.87 % symbols: 31
% 73.65/9.87 % clauses: 91
% 73.65/9.87 % start clauses: 6
% 73.65/9.87 % iterative deepening steps: 5856
% 73.65/9.87 % maximum path limit: 4
% 73.65/9.87 % literal attempts: 16807411
% 73.65/9.87 % depth failures: 13914350
% 73.65/9.87 % regularity failures: 407736
% 73.65/9.87 % tautology failures: 355047
% 73.65/9.87 % reductions: 262063
% 73.65/9.87 % extensions: 16542651
% 73.65/9.87 % SAT variables: 2663412
% 73.65/9.87 % SAT clauses: 3004593
% 73.65/9.87 % WalkSAT solutions: 3004571
% 73.65/9.87 % CDCL solutions: 19
% 73.65/9.87 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 73.65/9.87 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------