TSTP Solution File: SEU003+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU003+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:37:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.63s 2.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 17 unt; 2 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 67 ( 10 equ; 37 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
( in(esk2_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_dom(X1))
| X2 != relation_rng(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9kfxwy77/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_53,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(relation_rng(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk14_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9kfxwy77/lgb.p',i_0_53) ).
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9kfxwy77/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_11,plain,
( apply(X1,esk2_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X3
| X2 != relation_rng(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9kfxwy77/lgb.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(i_0_51,plain,
( in(apply(X1,X2),relation_dom(X3))
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9kfxwy77/lgb.p',i_0_51) ).
cnf(i_0_54,negated_conjecture,
relation_dom(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)) = relation_dom(esk15_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9kfxwy77/lgb.p',i_0_54) ).
cnf(i_0_58,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk14_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9kfxwy77/lgb.p',i_0_58) ).
cnf(i_0_56,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk15_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9kfxwy77/lgb.p',i_0_56) ).
cnf(i_0_57,negated_conjecture,
function(esk14_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9kfxwy77/lgb.p',i_0_57) ).
cnf(i_0_55,negated_conjecture,
function(esk15_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9kfxwy77/lgb.p',i_0_55) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9kfxwy77/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
( in(esk2_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_dom(X1))
| X2 != relation_rng(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_71,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(relation_rng(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk14_0)),
i_0_53 ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
( apply(X1,esk2_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X3
| X2 != relation_rng(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
( in(apply(X1,X2),relation_dom(X3))
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X3))) ),
i_0_51 ).
cnf(c_0_75,negated_conjecture,
relation_dom(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)) = relation_dom(esk15_0),
i_0_54 ).
cnf(c_0_76,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk14_0),
i_0_58 ).
cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk15_0),
i_0_56 ).
cnf(c_0_78,negated_conjecture,
function(esk14_0),
i_0_57 ).
cnf(c_0_79,negated_conjecture,
function(esk15_0),
i_0_55 ).
cnf(c_0_80,plain,
( in(esk2_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_70]) ).
cnf(c_0_81,negated_conjecture,
in(esk1_2(relation_rng(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk14_0)),relation_rng(esk15_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72]) ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
( apply(X1,esk2_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2)) = X2
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_73]) ).
cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
( in(apply(esk15_0,X1),relation_dom(esk14_0))
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75]),c_0_76]),c_0_77]),c_0_78]),c_0_79])]) ).
cnf(c_0_84,negated_conjecture,
in(esk2_3(esk15_0,relation_rng(esk15_0),esk1_2(relation_rng(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk14_0))),relation_dom(esk15_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81]),c_0_77]),c_0_79])]) ).
cnf(c_0_85,negated_conjecture,
apply(esk15_0,esk2_3(esk15_0,relation_rng(esk15_0),esk1_2(relation_rng(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk14_0)))) = esk1_2(relation_rng(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk14_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_81]),c_0_77]),c_0_79])]) ).
cnf(c_0_86,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_87,negated_conjecture,
in(esk1_2(relation_rng(esk15_0),relation_dom(esk14_0)),relation_dom(esk14_0)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84]),c_0_85]) ).
cnf(c_0_88,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_87]),c_0_71]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SEU003+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 21:33:41 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.63/2.42 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.63/2.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.63/2.42 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.63/2.42 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S064I
% 8.63/2.42 # and selection function SelectComplexG.
% 8.63/2.42 #
% 8.63/2.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 8.63/2.42 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.63/2.42
% 8.63/2.42 # Proof found!
% 8.63/2.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.63/2.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.63/2.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.63/2.42
% 8.63/2.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.63/2.42 # User time : 0.097 s
% 8.63/2.42 # System time : 0.009 s
% 8.63/2.42 # Total time : 0.107 s
% 8.63/2.42 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.63/2.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------