TSTP Solution File: SEU002+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU002+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:37:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.90s 2.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   38 (  17 unt;   0 nHn;  38 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  111 (  17 equ;  75 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    ( in(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_dom(X1))
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amvnvnet/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_8,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk1_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X3
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amvnvnet/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).

cnf(i_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk13_0,relation_rng(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amvnvnet/lgb.p',i_0_52) ).

cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    ( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amvnvnet/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk14_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amvnvnet/lgb.p',i_0_56) ).

cnf(i_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk15_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amvnvnet/lgb.p',i_0_54) ).

cnf(i_0_17,plain,
    ( function(relation_composition(X1,X2))
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amvnvnet/lgb.p',i_0_17) ).

cnf(i_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk14_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amvnvnet/lgb.p',i_0_55) ).

cnf(i_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk15_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amvnvnet/lgb.p',i_0_53) ).

cnf(i_0_7,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X3)
    | X1 != apply(X3,X4)
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amvnvnet/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(i_0_48,plain,
    ( in(apply(X1,X2),relation_dom(X3))
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amvnvnet/lgb.p',i_0_48) ).

cnf(i_0_50,plain,
    ( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amvnvnet/lgb.p',i_0_50) ).

cnf(i_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk13_0,relation_rng(esk14_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amvnvnet/lgb.p',i_0_51) ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    ( in(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_dom(X1))
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk1_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X3
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    ( in(esk1_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2),relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_70]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk13_0,relation_rng(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0))),
    i_0_52 ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk1_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2)) = X2
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_71]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_3(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0),relation_rng(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)),esk13_0),relation_dom(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)))
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0))
    | ~ function(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_73]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    ( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk14_0),
    i_0_56 ).

cnf(c_0_78,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk15_0),
    i_0_54 ).

cnf(c_0_79,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0),esk1_3(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0),relation_rng(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)),esk13_0)) = esk13_0
    | ~ relation(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0))
    | ~ function(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_73]) ).

cnf(c_0_80,plain,
    ( in(esk1_3(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0),relation_rng(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)),esk13_0),relation_dom(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)))
    | ~ function(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_76]),c_0_77]),c_0_78])]) ).

cnf(c_0_81,plain,
    ( function(relation_composition(X1,X2))
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_82,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk14_0),
    i_0_55 ).

cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk15_0),
    i_0_53 ).

cnf(c_0_84,plain,
    ( apply(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0),esk1_3(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0),relation_rng(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)),esk13_0)) = esk13_0
    | ~ function(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_76]),c_0_77]),c_0_78])]) ).

cnf(c_0_85,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X3)
    | X1 != apply(X3,X4)
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X3)) ),
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_86,plain,
    ( in(apply(X1,X2),relation_dom(X3))
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X3))) ),
    i_0_48 ).

cnf(c_0_87,plain,
    in(esk1_3(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0),relation_rng(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)),esk13_0),relation_dom(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81]),c_0_77]),c_0_78]),c_0_82]),c_0_83])]) ).

cnf(c_0_88,plain,
    ( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2))) ),
    i_0_50 ).

cnf(c_0_89,plain,
    apply(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0),esk1_3(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0),relation_rng(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)),esk13_0)) = esk13_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_81]),c_0_77]),c_0_78]),c_0_82]),c_0_83])]) ).

cnf(c_0_90,plain,
    ( in(apply(X1,X2),relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_85])]) ).

cnf(c_0_91,plain,
    in(apply(esk15_0,esk1_3(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0),relation_rng(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)),esk13_0)),relation_dom(esk14_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_87]),c_0_77]),c_0_78]),c_0_82]),c_0_83])]) ).

cnf(c_0_92,plain,
    apply(esk14_0,apply(esk15_0,esk1_3(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0),relation_rng(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)),esk13_0))) = esk13_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_88,c_0_87]),c_0_89]),c_0_77]),c_0_78]),c_0_82]),c_0_83])]) ).

cnf(c_0_93,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk13_0,relation_rng(esk14_0)),
    i_0_51 ).

cnf(c_0_94,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_91]),c_0_92]),c_0_77]),c_0_82])]),c_0_93]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : SEU002+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 19:40:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.43  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.90/2.30  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.90/2.30  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.90/2.30  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.90/2.30  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S4S
% 7.90/2.30  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 7.90/2.30  #
% 7.90/2.30  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 7.90/2.30  
% 7.90/2.30  # Proof found!
% 7.90/2.30  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.90/2.30  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.90/2.30  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.90/2.30  
% 7.90/2.30  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.90/2.30  # User time                : 0.027 s
% 7.90/2.30  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 7.90/2.30  # Total time               : 0.032 s
% 7.90/2.30  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.90/2.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------