TSTP Solution File: SEU002+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU002+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:16:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 5.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 57 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 269 ( 30 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 32 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 367 ( 155 ~; 154 |; 36 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 19 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 18 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 116 ( 3 sgn 56 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d5_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] :
( in(X4,relation_dom(X1))
& X3 = apply(X1,X4) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d5_funct_1) ).
fof(t22_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X3,X2)))
=> apply(relation_composition(X3,X2),X1) = apply(X2,apply(X3,X1)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t22_funct_1) ).
fof(fc1_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1)
& relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
& function(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fc1_funct_1) ).
fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& relation(X2) )
=> relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
fof(t1_subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( in(X1,X2)
=> element(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t1_subset) ).
fof(t21_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X3,X2)))
<=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
& in(apply(X3,X1),relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t21_funct_1) ).
fof(t2_subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( element(X1,X2)
=> ( empty(X2)
| in(X1,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t2_subset) ).
fof(t25_funct_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_rng(relation_composition(X3,X2)))
=> in(X1,relation_rng(X2)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t25_funct_1) ).
fof(t7_boole,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
~ ( in(X1,X2)
& empty(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t7_boole) ).
fof(fc8_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( empty(X1)
=> ( empty(relation_rng(X1))
& relation(relation_rng(X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fc8_relat_1) ).
fof(fc10_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( empty(X1)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( empty(relation_composition(X2,X1))
& relation(relation_composition(X2,X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fc10_relat_1) ).
fof(fc5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ empty(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ~ empty(relation_dom(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fc5_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X6,X11] :
( ( in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X5))
| ~ in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( X7 = apply(X5,esk1_3(X5,X6,X7))
| ~ in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( ~ in(X9,relation_dom(X5))
| X7 != apply(X5,X9)
| in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk2_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ in(X11,relation_dom(X5))
| esk2_2(X5,X6) != apply(X5,X11)
| X6 = relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( in(esk3_2(X5,X6),relation_dom(X5))
| in(esk2_2(X5,X6),X6)
| X6 = relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( esk2_2(X5,X6) = apply(X5,esk3_2(X5,X6))
| in(esk2_2(X5,X6),X6)
| X6 = relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(relation_composition(X6,X5)))
| apply(relation_composition(X6,X5),X4) = apply(X5,apply(X6,X4)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t22_funct_1])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( relation(relation_composition(X3,X4))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( function(relation_composition(X3,X4))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc1_funct_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| relation(relation_composition(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ in(X3,X4)
| element(X3,X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t1_subset])]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(relation_composition(X6,X5)))
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( in(apply(X6,X4),relation_dom(X5))
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(relation_composition(X6,X5)))
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
| ~ in(apply(X6,X4),relation_dom(X5))
| in(X4,relation_dom(relation_composition(X6,X5)))
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t21_funct_1])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( in(X3,X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != relation_rng(X1)
| X3 != apply(X1,X4)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( X3 = apply(X1,esk1_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != relation_rng(X1)
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3))
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2)))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( in(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != relation_rng(X1)
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( function(relation_composition(X2,X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( element(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( in(apply(X2,X3),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( in(apply(X1,X2),X3)
| X3 != relation_rng(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( apply(X1,apply(X2,esk1_3(relation_composition(X2,X1),X3,X4))) = X4
| X3 != relation_rng(relation_composition(X2,X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ in(X4,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).
fof(c_0_28,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ element(X3,X4)
| empty(X4)
| in(X3,X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_subset])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( element(apply(X1,X2),relation_dom(X3))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
fof(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_rng(relation_composition(X3,X2)))
=> in(X1,relation_rng(X2)) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t25_funct_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X3 != relation_rng(relation_composition(X4,X5))
| X2 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X5)
| ~ function(X4)
| ~ in(apply(X4,esk1_3(relation_composition(X4,X5),X3,X1)),relation_dom(X5))
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| empty(X2)
| ~ element(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( element(apply(X1,esk1_3(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3,X4)),relation_dom(X2))
| X3 != relation_rng(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ in(X4,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).
fof(c_0_34,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ in(X3,X4)
| ~ empty(X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t7_boole])]) ).
fof(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk14_0)
& function(esk14_0)
& relation(esk15_0)
& function(esk15_0)
& in(esk13_0,relation_rng(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)))
& ~ in(esk13_0,relation_rng(esk14_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( empty(relation_dom(X1))
| in(X2,X3)
| X4 != relation_rng(relation_composition(X5,X1))
| X3 != relation_rng(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X5)
| ~ in(X2,X4) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ empty(X1)
| ~ in(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
in(esk13_0,relation_rng(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
fof(c_0_39,plain,
! [X2] :
( ( empty(relation_rng(X2))
| ~ empty(X2) )
& ( relation(relation_rng(X2))
| ~ empty(X2) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc8_relat_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( empty(relation_dom(X1))
| in(X2,X3)
| X3 != relation_rng(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X4)
| ~ in(X2,relation_rng(relation_composition(X4,X1))) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk14_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk15_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
function(esk14_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
function(esk15_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
~ empty(relation_rng(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( empty(relation_rng(X1))
| ~ empty(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).
fof(c_0_47,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( empty(relation_composition(X4,X3))
| ~ empty(X3)
| ~ relation(X4) )
& ( relation(relation_composition(X4,X3))
| ~ empty(X3)
| ~ relation(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc10_relat_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_48,plain,
! [X2] :
( empty(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ empty(relation_dom(X2)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fc5_relat_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk13_0,relation_rng(esk14_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
( empty(relation_dom(esk14_0))
| in(esk13_0,X1)
| X1 != relation_rng(esk14_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_38]),c_0_41]),c_0_42]),c_0_43]),c_0_44])]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
~ empty(relation_composition(esk15_0,esk14_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( empty(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ empty(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( empty(X1)
| ~ empty(relation_dom(X1))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
empty(relation_dom(esk14_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
~ empty(esk14_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_42])]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_41])]),c_0_55]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : SEU002+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 19:51:29 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/5.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/5.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.24/5.42
% 0.24/5.42 # Proof found!
% 0.24/5.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/5.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/5.42 # Proof object total steps : 57
% 0.24/5.42 # Proof object clause steps : 32
% 0.24/5.42 # Proof object formula steps : 25
% 0.24/5.42 # Proof object conjectures : 15
% 0.24/5.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 12
% 0.24/5.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/5.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 19
% 0.24/5.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 12
% 0.24/5.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 13
% 0.24/5.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 16
% 0.24/5.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/5.42 # Parsed axioms : 37
% 0.24/5.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/5.42 # Initial clauses : 64
% 0.24/5.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/5.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 64
% 0.24/5.42 # Processed clauses : 17117
% 0.24/5.42 # ...of these trivial : 81
% 0.24/5.42 # ...subsumed : 11139
% 0.24/5.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 5897
% 0.24/5.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 20
% 0.24/5.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/5.42 # Backward-subsumed : 284
% 0.24/5.42 # Backward-rewritten : 1329
% 0.24/5.42 # Generated clauses : 163787
% 0.24/5.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 158420
% 0.24/5.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 18836
% 0.24/5.42 # Paramodulations : 161316
% 0.24/5.42 # Factorizations : 58
% 0.24/5.42 # Equation resolutions : 264
% 0.24/5.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 3484
% 0.24/5.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 884
% 0.24/5.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/5.42 # Negative unit clauses : 493
% 0.24/5.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 2107
% 0.24/5.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 112540
% 0.24/5.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 1094413
% 0.24/5.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/5.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 1615
% 0.24/5.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6171679
% 0.24/5.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 727889
% 0.24/5.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 28408
% 0.24/5.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1290454
% 0.24/5.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/5.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 870
% 0.24/5.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 864
% 0.24/5.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/5.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/5.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3878433
% 0.24/5.42
% 0.24/5.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/5.42 # User time : 4.733 s
% 0.24/5.42 # System time : 0.069 s
% 0.24/5.42 # Total time : 4.802 s
% 0.24/5.42 # Maximum resident set size: 131844 pages
% 0.24/23.39 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------