TSTP Solution File: SET995+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SET995+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:15:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 10.25s 2.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   35 (  19 unt;   3 nHn;  35 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   90 (  36 equ;  54 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X3 != singleton(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-si7sq7ll/input.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(i_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(esk14_0) = relation_rng(esk15_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-si7sq7ll/input.p',i_0_46) ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X3)
    | X1 != apply(X3,X4)
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-si7sq7ll/input.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(esk14_0) = relation_rng(esk16_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-si7sq7ll/input.p',i_0_45) ).

cnf(i_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk15_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-si7sq7ll/input.p',i_0_51) ).

cnf(i_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk15_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-si7sq7ll/input.p',i_0_50) ).

cnf(i_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    relation_dom(esk16_0) = relation_dom(esk15_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-si7sq7ll/input.p',i_0_47) ).

cnf(i_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk16_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-si7sq7ll/input.p',i_0_49) ).

cnf(i_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk16_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-si7sq7ll/input.p',i_0_48) ).

cnf(i_0_62,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | in(esk17_2(X1,X2),relation_dom(X1))
    | relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-si7sq7ll/input.p',i_0_62) ).

cnf(i_0_61,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(X2)
    | apply(X1,esk17_2(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,esk17_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-si7sq7ll/input.p',i_0_61) ).

cnf(i_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    esk16_0 != esk15_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-si7sq7ll/input.p',i_0_44) ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X3 != singleton(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ in(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_75]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(esk14_0) = relation_rng(esk15_0),
    i_0_46 ).

cnf(c_0_78,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X3)
    | X1 != apply(X3,X4)
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X3)) ),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_79,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(esk14_0) = relation_rng(esk16_0),
    i_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk14_0
    | ~ in(X1,relation_rng(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_77]) ).

cnf(c_0_81,plain,
    ( in(apply(X1,X2),relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_78])]) ).

cnf(c_0_82,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk15_0),
    i_0_51 ).

cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk15_0),
    i_0_50 ).

cnf(c_0_84,negated_conjecture,
    relation_rng(esk16_0) = relation_rng(esk15_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_77]) ).

cnf(c_0_85,negated_conjecture,
    relation_dom(esk16_0) = relation_dom(esk15_0),
    i_0_47 ).

cnf(c_0_86,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk16_0),
    i_0_49 ).

cnf(c_0_87,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk16_0),
    i_0_48 ).

cnf(c_0_88,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | in(esk17_2(X1,X2),relation_dom(X1))
    | relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_62 ).

cnf(c_0_89,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(X2)
    | apply(X1,esk17_2(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,esk17_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_61 ).

cnf(c_0_90,plain,
    ( apply(esk15_0,X1) = esk14_0
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81]),c_0_82]),c_0_83])]) ).

cnf(c_0_91,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(apply(esk16_0,X1),relation_rng(esk15_0))
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_84]),c_0_85]),c_0_86]),c_0_87])]) ).

cnf(c_0_92,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk16_0
    | in(esk17_2(X1,esk16_0),relation_dom(X1))
    | relation_dom(X1) != relation_dom(esk15_0)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_88,c_0_86]),c_0_85]),c_0_87])]) ).

cnf(c_0_93,negated_conjecture,
    esk16_0 != esk15_0,
    i_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_94,plain,
    ( esk15_0 = X1
    | apply(X1,esk17_2(esk15_0,X1)) != esk14_0
    | relation_dom(esk15_0) != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ in(esk17_2(esk15_0,X1),relation_dom(esk15_0))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90]),c_0_82]),c_0_83])]) ).

cnf(c_0_95,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(esk16_0,X1) = esk14_0
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_91]) ).

cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk17_2(esk15_0,esk16_0),relation_dom(esk15_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_92]),c_0_82]),c_0_83])]),c_0_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_97,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_95]),c_0_85]),c_0_96]),c_0_86]),c_0_87])]),c_0_93]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SET995+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 17:44:03 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 10.25/2.73  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 10.25/2.73  # No SInE strategy applied
% 10.25/2.73  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 10.25/2.73  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 10.25/2.73  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 10.25/2.73  #
% 10.25/2.73  # Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 10.25/2.73  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 10.25/2.73  
% 10.25/2.73  # Proof found!
% 10.25/2.73  # SZS status Theorem
% 10.25/2.73  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.25/2.73  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.25/2.73  
% 10.25/2.73  # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.25/2.73  # User time                : 0.037 s
% 10.25/2.73  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 10.25/2.73  # Total time               : 0.041 s
% 10.25/2.73  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 10.25/2.73  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------