TSTP Solution File: SET987+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SET987+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:26:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (  22 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  16   ~;   2   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (  16   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f68,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f67,f42]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    sK1 != sF6,
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f29,f41,f39,f40,f39]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    set_union2(sK1,sF4) = sF5,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    sF4 = singleton(sK0),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    set_difference(sF5,sF4) = sF6,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    set_difference(set_union2(sK1,singleton(sK0)),singleton(sK0)) != sK1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ( set_difference(set_union2(sK1,singleton(sK0)),singleton(sK0)) != sK1
    & ~ in(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f15,f20]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( set_difference(set_union2(X1,singleton(X0)),singleton(X0)) != X1
        & ~ in(X0,X1) )
   => ( set_difference(set_union2(sK1,singleton(sK0)),singleton(sK0)) != sK1
      & ~ in(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( set_difference(set_union2(X1,singleton(X0)),singleton(X0)) != X1
      & ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ in(X0,X1)
       => set_difference(set_union2(X1,singleton(X0)),singleton(X0)) = X1 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f8,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X0,X1)
     => set_difference(set_union2(X1,singleton(X0)),singleton(X0)) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t141_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    sK1 = sF6,
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f66,f62]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    set_difference(sK1,sF4) = sK1,
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f60,f39]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    sK1 = set_difference(sK1,singleton(sK0)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f35,f28]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ~ in(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( in(X1,X0)
      | set_difference(X0,singleton(X1)) = X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( set_difference(X0,singleton(X1)) = X0
      | in(X1,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X1,X0)
     => set_difference(X0,singleton(X1)) = X0 ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( set_difference(X0,singleton(X1)) = X0
    <=> ~ in(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t65_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    set_difference(sK1,sF4) = sF6,
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f65,f41]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    set_difference(sK1,sF4) = set_difference(sF5,sF4),
    inference(superposition,[],[f38,f40]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_difference(set_union2(X0,X1),X1) = set_difference(X0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_difference(set_union2(X0,X1),X1) = set_difference(X0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_xboole_1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SET987+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 14:55:16 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.49  % (820)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.20/0.49  % (820)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.49  % (820)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  % (820)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (820)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.49  % (820)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.49  % (820)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  % (820)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.20/0.49  % (820)Time elapsed: 0.091 s
% 0.20/0.49  % (820)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.49  % (820)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (820)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (807)Success in time 0.139 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------