TSTP Solution File: SET987+1 by ConnectPP---0.3.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ConnectPP---0.3.0
% Problem : SET987+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : connect++ --verbosity 0 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Mar 25 14:32:55 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.36s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SET987+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : connect++ --verbosity 0 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Mar 20 21:46:45 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.36 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.36 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 % Formula: antisymmetry_r2_hidden ( axiom ) converted to clauses:
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(antisymmetry_r2_hidden-1, axiom, ( ~in(_u1, _u0) | ~in(_u0, _u1) )).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 % Formula: commutativity_k2_xboole_0 ( axiom ) converted to clauses:
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(commutativity_k2_xboole_0-1, axiom, ( ( set_union2(_u3, _u2) = set_union2(_u2, _u3)) )).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 % Formula: fc2_xboole_0 ( axiom ) converted to clauses:
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(fc2_xboole_0-1, axiom, ( empty(_u5) | ~empty(set_union2(_u5, _u4)) )).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 % Formula: fc3_xboole_0 ( axiom ) converted to clauses:
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(fc3_xboole_0-1, axiom, ( empty(_u7) | ~empty(set_union2(_u6, _u7)) )).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 % Formula: idempotence_k2_xboole_0 ( axiom ) converted to clauses:
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(idempotence_k2_xboole_0-1, axiom, ( ( set_union2(_u9, _u9) = _u9) )).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 % Formula: rc1_xboole_0 ( axiom ) converted to clauses:
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(rc1_xboole_0-1, axiom, ( empty(skolem1) )).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 % Formula: rc2_xboole_0 ( axiom ) converted to clauses:
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(rc2_xboole_0-1, axiom, ( ~empty(skolem2) )).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 % Formula: t141_zfmisc_1 ( conjecture ) (definitionally) converted to clauses:
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(t141_zfmisc_1-1, negated_conjecture, ( ~in(skolem3, skolem4) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(t141_zfmisc_1-2, negated_conjecture, ( ( set_difference(set_union2(skolem4, singleton(skolem3)), singleton(skolem3)) != skolem4) )).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 % Formula: t40_xboole_1 ( axiom ) converted to clauses:
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(t40_xboole_1-1, axiom, ( ( set_difference(set_union2(_u15, _u14), _u14) = set_difference(_u15, _u14)) )).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 % Formula: t65_zfmisc_1 ( axiom ) converted to clauses:
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(t65_zfmisc_1-1, axiom, ( ( set_difference(_u20, singleton(_u18)) != _u20) | ~in(_u18, _u20) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(t65_zfmisc_1-2, axiom, ( in(_u19, _u21) | ( set_difference(_u21, singleton(_u19)) = _u21) )).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 % Problem matrix:
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-0, plain, ( ( __eqx_0 = __eqx_0) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-1, plain, ( ( __eqx_0 != __eqx_1) | ( __eqx_1 = __eqx_0) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-2, plain, ( ( __eqx_0 != __eqx_1) | ( __eqx_1 != __eqx_2) | ( __eqx_0 = __eqx_2) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-3, plain, ( ( __eqx_0 != __eqy_0) | ( __eqx_1 != __eqy_1) | ( set_union2(__eqx_0, __eqx_1) = set_union2(__eqy_0, __eqy_1)) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-4, plain, ( ( __eqx_0 != __eqy_0) | ( singleton(__eqx_0) = singleton(__eqy_0)) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-5, plain, ( ( __eqx_0 != __eqy_0) | ( __eqx_1 != __eqy_1) | ( set_difference(__eqx_0, __eqx_1) = set_difference(__eqy_0, __eqy_1)) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-6, plain, ( ( __eqx_0 != __eqy_0) | ( __eqx_1 != __eqy_1) | ~in(__eqx_0, __eqx_1) | in(__eqy_0, __eqy_1) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-7, plain, ( ( __eqx_0 != __eqy_0) | ~empty(__eqx_0) | empty(__eqy_0) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-8, plain, ( ~in(_u1, _u0) | ~in(_u0, _u1) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-9, plain, ( ( set_union2(_u3, _u2) = set_union2(_u2, _u3)) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-10, plain, ( empty(_u5) | ~empty(set_union2(_u5, _u4)) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-11, plain, ( empty(_u7) | ~empty(set_union2(_u6, _u7)) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-12, plain, ( ( set_union2(_u9, _u9) = _u9) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-13, plain, ( empty(skolem1) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-14, plain, ( ~empty(skolem2) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-15, plain, ( ~in(skolem3, skolem4) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-16, plain, ( ( set_difference(set_union2(skolem4, singleton(skolem3)), singleton(skolem3)) != skolem4) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-17, plain, ( ( set_difference(set_union2(_u15, _u14), _u14) = set_difference(_u15, _u14)) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-18, plain, ( ( set_difference(_u20, singleton(_u18)) != _u20) | ~in(_u18, _u20) )).
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(matrix-19, plain, ( in(_u19, _u21) | ( set_difference(_u21, singleton(_u19)) = _u21) )).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 % Proof stack:
% 0.19/0.36 cnf(proof-stack, plain,
% 0.19/0.36 proof_stack(
% 0.19/0.36 start(15),
% 0.19/0.36 left_branch(0, 19, 0, 2),
% 0.19/0.36 left_branch(0, 2, 1, 3),
% 0.19/0.36 left_branch(0, 17, 0, 4),
% 0.19/0.36 right_branch(4),
% 0.19/0.36 left_branch(0, 16, 0, 5),
% 0.19/0.36 right_branch(5),
% 0.19/0.36 right_branch(3),
% 0.19/0.36 right_branch(2)
% 0.19/0.36 )).
% 0.19/0.36 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------